Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZJonnie

(106 posts)
38. I think that's a possible, but unlikely, reason for the sites pulling out of some of these states
Fri Jan 3, 2025, 03:16 AM
Friday

More likely, in my reckoning, is that the lawmakers in the state wanted the porn companies (esp. the 'free' ones like pronhub and xnxx) out of the state, and crafted the laws in such a way that they knew this would be the outcome, without having to obviously violate the 1A.

And I'd wager their primary lever to accomplish this was by creating new liability issues that are either explicitly onerous, or leave unanswered questions about liability scope, such as: Who's allowed to sue, under what conditions, and where does the burden of proof lie? How much can be awarded to a plaintiff? Could any such laws make the sites ownership criminally liable for a minor accessing the site?

Lastly, I don't think minors spend much money (relative to adults) on porn purchases, or chaturbate, or sex toys, or male enhancement, the sales of which are what the free 'hubs' are about. Their free porn clips are a 'loss leader', and I'd bet your average minor that visits these sites is a 'money-loser' for them. I'd also bet that if these sites could eliminate minors usage thereof, without it costing them money for age verification services for everyone ELSE, and absent any liabilities for the failure of their system to do so perfectly at all times, every one of them would sign up for that.

That's my humble assessment, for what it's worth.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Watch what happens. OAITW r.2.0 Thursday #1
how? why? Unladen Swallow Thursday #3
I just VPN around it. N/t gay texan Thursday #6
Yes, but you are smarter than most of the people who would use Pornhub or the like. (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Thursday #17
How is keeping under-18-year-olds Unladen Swallow Thursday #2
It is freaking annoying ... all about eye-catching headlines for clicks AZJonnie Thursday #9
All excellent points Unladen Swallow Thursday #11
In the early days of the Internet.... OAITW r.2.0 Thursday #26
In the days before the Internet BOSSHOG Friday #52
If you think that was the only porn.... getagrip_already Friday #53
I don't think that. BOSSHOG Friday #54
Yup, the 18 and younger know how to get around Johonny Thursday #22
The states with the highest % of porn viewers are red states. magicarpet Thursday #4
#1 state for porn is... Morbius Thursday #10
Or not.... Celerity Thursday #25
2023 Maryland was #1 page views of porn. William769 Friday #37
This is the low hanging fruit for the oligarchs to begin broader content bans Docreed2003 Thursday #5
Exactly. More straight up NAZI sht. B.See Friday #42
Many of those morality states voted for a rapist? keithbvadu2 Thursday #7
It will probably end up being easier to get a gun for under 18. RoeVWade Thursday #8
I don't get it... Blue_Tires Thursday #12
You have a lot of knowledge about porn sites Kaleva Friday #34
If only some university offered a Ph.D in the field Blue_Tires Friday #36
Lol! Kaleva Friday #50
Like abortion, men will have to travel out of state Demovictory9 Thursday #13
Men can access it anywhere iemanja Thursday #18
The porn websites are pulling outof red states. Blocking access Demovictory9 Thursday #21
That shows they intended to sell porn to children iemanja Thursday #30
I think that's a possible, but unlikely, reason for the sites pulling out of some of these states AZJonnie Friday #38
So much for free speech! Initech Thursday #14
They're coming for my porn! Jeebo Thursday #15
TSA has heard that story before and they've got the latex gloves to prove it. PeaceWave Thursday #16
Why are people upset children can't access porn? iemanja Thursday #19
You have to upload your ID on the web to prove you're an adult newdeal2 Thursday #24
I guess you don't need to access porn then iemanja Thursday #31
If you think this law will stop kids from viewing porn newdeal2 Friday #32
Are you opposed to having a legal drinking age ? MichMan Friday #41
Are you okay entering your ID credentials every time you watch TV? So that the kiddos avoid anything harmful newdeal2 Friday #44
Then iemanja Friday #45
I'm concerned about newdeal2 Friday #46
I see nothing wrong with protecting children iemanja Friday #47
That doesn't mean that an ineffective law is good newdeal2 Friday #48
What would be an effective law? iemanja Friday #49
I have no problem with restricting access. This is NOT a hill "progressives" should die on. valleyrogue Thursday #20
Not that I agree, but many progressives accept sex work as a legitimate profession. PeaceWave Thursday #23
I wish they'd demand limiting hate speech with 1/10 as much fervor as they are limiting normal human business of sex. OAITW r.2.0 Thursday #27
anybody any age can sign into pornhub. it's toally accessable nt msongs Thursday #28
A friend told you that? Kaleva Friday #35
"Why are people upset children can't access porn?" J_William_Ryan Thursday #29
Exactly ibegurpard Friday #33
You got it -- and Project 2025 already did TommyT139 Friday #40
Smart authoritarians know that you don't take everything away. Mike 03 Friday #39
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Friday #43
Have Trump supporters heard about this? I mean the price of bacon is one thing, surfered Friday #51
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Friday #55
We must think of the children!! Elessar Zappa Saturday #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Independent: Pornhub ...»Reply #38