Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZJonnie

(824 posts)
38. I think that's a possible, but unlikely, reason for the sites pulling out of some of these states
Fri Jan 3, 2025, 04:16 AM
Jan 2025

More likely, in my reckoning, is that the lawmakers in the state wanted the porn companies (esp. the 'free' ones like pronhub and xnxx) out of the state, and crafted the laws in such a way that they knew this would be the outcome, without having to obviously violate the 1A.

And I'd wager their primary lever to accomplish this was by creating new liability issues that are either explicitly onerous, or leave unanswered questions about liability scope, such as: Who's allowed to sue, under what conditions, and where does the burden of proof lie? How much can be awarded to a plaintiff? Could any such laws make the sites ownership criminally liable for a minor accessing the site?

Lastly, I don't think minors spend much money (relative to adults) on porn purchases, or chaturbate, or sex toys, or male enhancement, the sales of which are what the free 'hubs' are about. Their free porn clips are a 'loss leader', and I'd bet your average minor that visits these sites is a 'money-loser' for them. I'd also bet that if these sites could eliminate minors usage thereof, without it costing them money for age verification services for everyone ELSE, and absent any liabilities for the failure of their system to do so perfectly at all times, every one of them would sign up for that.

That's my humble assessment, for what it's worth.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Watch what happens. OAITW r.2.0 Jan 2025 #1
how? why? Unladen Swallow Jan 2025 #3
I just VPN around it. N/t gay texan Jan 2025 #6
Yes, but you are smarter than most of the people who would use Pornhub or the like. (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Jan 2025 #17
How is keeping under-18-year-olds Unladen Swallow Jan 2025 #2
It is freaking annoying ... all about eye-catching headlines for clicks AZJonnie Jan 2025 #9
All excellent points Unladen Swallow Jan 2025 #11
In the early days of the Internet.... OAITW r.2.0 Jan 2025 #26
In the days before the Internet BOSSHOG Jan 2025 #52
If you think that was the only porn.... getagrip_already Jan 2025 #53
I don't think that. BOSSHOG Jan 2025 #54
Yup, the 18 and younger know how to get around Johonny Jan 2025 #22
The states with the highest % of porn viewers are red states. magicarpet Jan 2025 #4
#1 state for porn is... Morbius Jan 2025 #10
Or not.... Celerity Jan 2025 #25
2023 Maryland was #1 page views of porn. William769 Jan 2025 #37
This is the low hanging fruit for the oligarchs to begin broader content bans Docreed2003 Jan 2025 #5
Exactly. More straight up NAZI sht. B.See Jan 2025 #42
Many of those morality states voted for a rapist? keithbvadu2 Jan 2025 #7
It will probably end up being easier to get a gun for under 18. RoeVWade Jan 2025 #8
I don't get it... Blue_Tires Jan 2025 #12
You have a lot of knowledge about porn sites Kaleva Jan 2025 #34
If only some university offered a Ph.D in the field Blue_Tires Jan 2025 #36
Lol! Kaleva Jan 2025 #50
Like abortion, men will have to travel out of state Demovictory9 Jan 2025 #13
Men can access it anywhere iemanja Jan 2025 #18
The porn websites are pulling outof red states. Blocking access Demovictory9 Jan 2025 #21
That shows they intended to sell porn to children iemanja Jan 2025 #30
I think that's a possible, but unlikely, reason for the sites pulling out of some of these states AZJonnie Jan 2025 #38
So much for free speech! Initech Jan 2025 #14
They're coming for my porn! Jeebo Jan 2025 #15
TSA has heard that story before and they've got the latex gloves to prove it. PeaceWave Jan 2025 #16
Why are people upset children can't access porn? iemanja Jan 2025 #19
You have to upload your ID on the web to prove you're an adult newdeal2 Jan 2025 #24
I guess you don't need to access porn then iemanja Jan 2025 #31
If you think this law will stop kids from viewing porn newdeal2 Jan 2025 #32
Are you opposed to having a legal drinking age ? MichMan Jan 2025 #41
Are you okay entering your ID credentials every time you watch TV? So that the kiddos avoid anything harmful newdeal2 Jan 2025 #44
Then iemanja Jan 2025 #45
I'm concerned about newdeal2 Jan 2025 #46
I see nothing wrong with protecting children iemanja Jan 2025 #47
That doesn't mean that an ineffective law is good newdeal2 Jan 2025 #48
What would be an effective law? iemanja Jan 2025 #49
I have no problem with restricting access. This is NOT a hill "progressives" should die on. valleyrogue Jan 2025 #20
Not that I agree, but many progressives accept sex work as a legitimate profession. PeaceWave Jan 2025 #23
I wish they'd demand limiting hate speech with 1/10 as much fervor as they are limiting normal human business of sex. OAITW r.2.0 Jan 2025 #27
anybody any age can sign into pornhub. it's toally accessable nt msongs Jan 2025 #28
A friend told you that? Kaleva Jan 2025 #35
"Why are people upset children can't access porn?" J_William_Ryan Jan 2025 #29
Exactly ibegurpard Jan 2025 #33
You got it -- and Project 2025 already did TommyT139 Jan 2025 #40
Smart authoritarians know that you don't take everything away. Mike 03 Jan 2025 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Jan 2025 #43
Have Trump supporters heard about this? I mean the price of bacon is one thing, surfered Jan 2025 #51
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2025 #55
We must think of the children!! Elessar Zappa Jan 2025 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Independent: Pornhub ...»Reply #38