Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(162,741 posts)
Sun Jan 19, 2025, 02:14 PM Sunday

Posted this prematurely: Mike Johnson REMOVED As SPEAKER, 160 Republicans VOTE HIM OUT MOMENTS AGO?!?

Last edited Sun Jan 19, 2025, 02:51 PM - Edit history (1)



This was a badly handled attempt to grab a hot story without taking enough time to be sure about it. Had I listened to it long enough before posting, I wouldn'ta done it. So sorry.

Thank you.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

JohnSJ

(97,023 posts)
2. I don't believe it. When I google Mike Johnson no mention of it. mike johnson did remove turner from the house
Sun Jan 19, 2025, 02:17 PM
Sunday

intelligence committee though.


hlthe2b

(107,359 posts)
3. Judi, Mike TURNER (not Johnson) was removed last week from Intel chairman. I think this is confused.
Sun Jan 19, 2025, 02:18 PM
Sunday

??????????????

dweller

(25,298 posts)
8. 😩
Sun Jan 19, 2025, 02:26 PM
Sunday

I’m melting

🫥


You have to skip to the end 1:24 or so to get the point. … 😐

✌🏻

Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

LiberalArkie

(16,852 posts)
10. Per the Slavic gentleman on the podcast:
Sun Jan 19, 2025, 02:28 PM
Sunday

I don't care about official titles:

Musk is President Elect
Trump is the Speaker

MAGA mike is a puppet

Attilatheblond

(4,880 posts)
12. Ummm, 435 members is the House. 160 wouldn't be enought to fire his ass unless most members are at brunch
Sun Jan 19, 2025, 02:33 PM
Sunday

What is this about?

mactire

(127 posts)
14. BS OUTFIT
Sun Jan 19, 2025, 02:37 PM
Sunday

I learned a long time ago to totally ignore any of the vids from this outfit known as “Progressive Politics Network”. They are misleading and dishonest in their so- called reports. They usually have the large red field on their bated site so it’s easy to recognize them and avoid being tempted to click on.

Judi Lynn

(162,741 posts)
15. You're so right. I posted it in total ignorance, before I had heard much beyond the start.
Sun Jan 19, 2025, 02:46 PM
Sunday

Deeply surprised and sorry.

The host took great liberties with his manner of introducing his "take" on what has happened with the current Speaker, and the fact Trump is actually controlling his behavior from now on, or he'll be gone.

Thank you, so much, for your civilized and thoughtful post. It's most appreciated.

Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Liberal YouTubers»Posted this prematurely: ...