Did Merrick Garland End Our Democracy? W John Fugelsang/Cliff Schecter

[ihaveaquestion]

[sop]

1. No. ("Betteridge's Law of Headlines" states any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered, "no.")

Garland didn't do much to prevent it, though.

[Bobstandard]

3. The concomitant answer, of course, is Yes. nt

[nilram]

6. I'm in Camp 'Maybe'

Definitely.

[Oopsie Daisy]

10. Thank you. I didn't know there was an actual name for it... but it's something that I'd previously observed *

* when there was a clickbait-ish headline ending in a question-mark. The answer is always no.

[onecaliberal]

2. Doing his job would have prevented, so yes! Absolutely💯

[Turbineguy]

4. If he did,

he had a lot of help.

There's 350 million people here. Why does one person have such power?

[notinkansas]

5. Garland certainly had a hand in the destruction, but

Mitch McConnell started the process by seeing to it that 45's second impeachment failed in the Senate.

[mzmolly]

7. You mean Mitch McConnell?

[The Unmitigated Gall]

8. "The greatest mistakes in our history are not punishing the bad guys". nt

[spike jones]

9. I believe that Citizens United is also responsible;

for the richest man in the world having great influence on national political policy.