Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rhiannon12866

(260,472 posts)
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 11:50 PM 3 hrs ago

Lawrence: White House effectively says NYT reporters must have tapes of Situation Room meeting - The Last Word - MS NOW



From suspending Habeas Corpus to invoking the Insurrection Act, MS NOW's Lawrence O'Donnell examines new reporting from The New York Times' Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan detailing White House discussions that alarmed even some Trump officials.

Lawrence says, "it is easy to imagine what goes on in the Trump White House: discussions of trampling the Constitution, violating the law, and crushing our rights." - Aired on 06/15/2026.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawrence: White House effectively says NYT reporters must have tapes of Situation Room meeting - The Last Word - MS NOW (Original Post) Rhiannon12866 3 hrs ago OP
Am i wrong to assume they are terrified for the political ramifications and less about the actual national security SSJVegeta 3 hrs ago #1
We can certainly hope, but would this have the support in Congress? Rhiannon12866 3 hrs ago #2

SSJVegeta

(3,373 posts)
1. Am i wrong to assume they are terrified for the political ramifications and less about the actual national security
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 12:08 AM
3 hrs ago

Stuff?



Like: they say trump and Miller seriously spoke about suspending the constitution. If there are tapes: Could Trump actually be done?

Rhiannon12866

(260,472 posts)
2. We can certainly hope, but would this have the support in Congress?
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 12:14 AM
3 hrs ago

Nixon was done when his own party turned against him, but we haven't seen the same advocacy for the Rule of Law among the current Republican party.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Cable News Clips»Lawrence: White House eff...