Cable News Clips
Related: About this forumTrump: Beyonce should be prosecuted for Harris endorsement - CNN
President Donald Trump over the weekend called for the prosecution of music superstar Beyoncé based on something that did not actually happen. Trump claimed in a social media post that Beyoncé broke the law by supposedly getting paid $11 million for her endorsement of Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris during an October 2024 event in Houston. But there is simply no basis for Trumps claim that Beyoncé received an $11 million payment related to the Harris campaign, let alone for the endorsement in particular.

bucolic_frolic
(51,626 posts)Payments are how he keeps all his endorsements in line.
Srkdqltr
(8,706 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(126,551 posts)Diamond_Dog
(37,796 posts)And we dont have to listen to his petty lies about people he doesnt like.
Norrrm
(2,539 posts)Donald::: arrest Beyonce if you have the balls. You claim she committed a crime
You own the AG
You own the DOJ.
You own your various goon squads of police.
Why don't you arrest her?
You don't have the balls?
twodogsbarking
(14,640 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(166,964 posts)soldierant
(8,774 posts)the nation somehow damages as a result, which is, to put it mildly, highly unlikely, elections are nor criminal, and Beyonce would not have been accomplice to a crime. And you cannot charge someone with being an accomplice to a crime that didn't happen.
Disagreeing with the Apricot Antichrist is not a crime, except in his own mind (where he is a legend -which he is nowhere else.) If he tried to pass a law to that effect, I doubt if even the reckless Supreme Court we now have (apologies to the three sane justices) would uphold it against the First Amendment - and even if it was upheld, ex post facto prosecution is still a no-no, and has been since long before the Battle of Bosworth, after which Henry VII attempted to prosecute his political enemies by dating his reign from the day before the battle (it didn't work. Parliament wouldn't have it, even then.)
LetMyPeopleVote
(166,964 posts)When an American president, hellbent on revenge, creates a list filled with his perceived political foes, its best not to look away.
Will Kamala Harris, Beyonce, and Oprah be prosecuted over made-up claims? Probably not.
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-07-28T18:02:42.324Z
But when an authoritarian-style president, hellbent on revenge, creates a prosecute-my-enemies list, itâs best not to look away. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-adds-kamala-harris-beyonce-oprah-list-wants-prosecuted-rcna221482
I have some bad news for anybody who believed any of these claims. The Hill reported:
President Trump on Saturday doubled down on his accusations that former Vice President Harris paid celebrities to endorse her during the 2024 presidential election. The president, echoing previous claims that Harris paid Beyoncé, Oprah and Al Sharpton to support her White House bid throughout the campaign trail, said Harris and the celebrities involved should be prosecuted.
....But before that observation brings comfort to anyone, its important to acknowledge the broader landscape. The New York Times, assessing Trumps intensifying campaign of retribution, reported last week, This is what Washington thought retribution would look like."
When President Trump started his second term, there were deep fears among current and former Justice Department officials, legal experts and Democrats that Mr. Trump would follow through on his repeated promises to lock up or otherwise pursue charges against high-profile figures like Liz Cheney, James B. Comey and former President Barack Obama. Mr. Trump quickly went after perceived enemies but not always the anticipated ones and often not in the anticipated ways.
The Times analysis noted that the Republican has displayed a willingness to weaponize the federal government in novel and audacious ways, and theres ample evidence to bolster the point. Just last week, for example, Trump falsely and repeatedly accused Barack Obama of treason, suggesting the former Democratic president should be prosecuted over made-up allegations. Soon after, Trump talked up the idea of prosecuting Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff of California, too.
....Im disinclined to look away because Im mindful of the degree to which Trump has surrounded himself with loyalists who will turn his rhetoric into action. As the aforementioned New York Times analysis added:
Repeatedly in his first term, Mr. Trump accused his perceived enemies of treason and tried to push the F.B.I. and Justice Department to indict them. He told his chief of staff that he wanted to get the I.R.S. on those who crossed him. Many of them were investigated, and two of them were the subjects of highly unusual and invasive audits, but none of them were ever charged. The difference now is that Mr. Trump, much more so than during his first term, is surrounded by aides and cabinet members who often appear willing to follow through on his angriest and most authoritarian impulses.
The Times report added, The efforts to target top officials from previous administrations appears to be gaining momentum. Watch this space.