Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Movies
Related: About this forumQuestion......why do ALL futuristic movies that have weapons, ALL LOOK LIKE THE SAME OL' FIREARMS OF
TODAY, ONLY A TAD MORE STYLISH???
Its kinda funny that weapons with bullets no matter what time frame always look the same.
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Question......why do ALL futuristic movies that have weapons, ALL LOOK LIKE THE SAME OL' FIREARMS OF (Original Post)
a kennedy
6 hrs ago
OP
rsdsharp
(12,010 posts)1. Han Solo's blaster was a dressed up Mauser C96 --
the Broomhandle Mauser, introduced in 1896.
Irish_Dem
(81,359 posts)2. Because gun like objects look menacing and scary.
Replace it with something that looks like a hairbrush or pen and it looses
the ominous feel.
Movies only have an hour and a half to create a story and mood.
They don't have time to retrain on emotive movie symbolism.
a kennedy
(36,007 posts)3. Damn Irish_Dem......always loved your reply's.....and thanks.
Irish_Dem
(81,359 posts)4. Well I have to help out someone named Kennedy.
Goes without saying my friend.
hunter
(40,702 posts)5. I doubt gun-toting humanity has much of a future.
But we can pretend until the curtain comes down.
John1956PA
(4,972 posts)6. It's a phallic thing. To its credit, "Star Trek, The Next Generation" has tasers which look like hand-held scanners.
