Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Good News
Related: About this forumLegal Experts See Uphill Battle For Trump in Fraud Case: BBC
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67366022On Monday Mr Trump's defence team will begin presenting their side, calling the former president's oldest son back to the stand as their first witness. But legal analysts told the BBC that after two damaging weeks of testimony from members of the Trump family, salvaging their case now will be a herculean task.
"It's been a disaster from a legal perspective," said Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and president of West Coast Trial Lawyers.
He believes that Mr Trump is "going to lose this case, and lose badly".
In a worst-case scenario for Mr Trump, Judge Arthur Engoron could bar him and his fellow defendants from doing business in New York, and issue fines of at least $250m (£204m) in penalties.
Perhaps the most harmful of all the testimony came from Mr Trump himself. When he took the stand on Monday, he called New York Attorney General Letitia James a "political hack", declared the case "a disgrace" and personally attacked Judge Engoron.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Legal Experts See Uphill Battle For Trump in Fraud Case: BBC (Original Post)
Stuart G
Nov 2023
OP
MichMan
(13,664 posts)1. I thought the judge already found him guilty of all charges.
MOMFUDSKI
(7,080 posts)2. I will assume when they are talking losing,
they mean in terms of $$$.
yonder
(10,010 posts)3. It will be interesting to see how any previous testimony of "I do not recall"
squares with any new testimony from memory.
Will their recall magically improve when questioned by the defense?