Seniors
Related: About this forum"70 Is the New 60": Groundbreaking Study Redefines Aging
https://scitechdaily.com/70-is-the-new-60-groundbreaking-study-redefines-aging/This is an interesting study. It is only for an English cohort but it should have some parallels for other populations.
A recent study from the Robert N. Butler Columbia Aging Center at the Mailman School of Public Health highlights notable improvements in the overall health of older adults in England compared to previous generations. Instead of focusing solely on the presence or absence of disease, the researchpublished in Nature Agingadopted a novel approach to assess trends in individuals functional abilities, including cognitive, locomotor, psychological, and sensory capacities.
Drawing on data from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging, the findings reveal that todays older adults demonstrate better physical and mental functioning than their counterparts of earlier generations at the same age.
These improvements were large, said John Beard, MBBS, PhD, Irene Diamond Professor of Aging in Health Policy and Management in the Butler Columbia Aging Center of Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health and author of the study. For example, a 68-year-old born in 1950 had a similar capacity to a 62-year-old born a decade earlier, and those born in 1940 had better functioning than those born in 1930 or 1920. Beard noted, If we had compared someone born in 1950 with someone born in 1920, we would have likely observed even greater improvements.
rampartd
(1,013 posts)i fell apart at 60 , and it has taken me a decade to beat back the physical stuff and decide i'm going to live a few years . i'm looking at 70 as the new 20.
some articles lie this might be laying the propaganda groundwork for raaising the dsocial security age.
the fact that lawyers are living longer is no excuse to raise the retirement age of coal miners.
yorkster
(2,540 posts)potential re social security.
Turbineguy
(38,537 posts)bucolic_frolic
(47,767 posts)The Madcap
(678 posts)To keep us working longer for even less.
Mr.Bill
(24,903 posts)I lived my teens like I would not make it to 20, lived my 20s like I would not make it to 30, and so on. I'm 71 now, and I'm sure I will not make it to 80.
The best thing about this is eventually I will be correct.
LizBeth
(10,927 posts)than what I am. Already so much pressure and expectation on women with body and looks now we got this.
cyclonefence
(4,911 posts)At sixty, I could physically do whatever I wanted to (I fortunately didn't want to run marathons or even down the street); life was good; I had energy and a real *life*. I truly felt like I was about 45 yrs old.
At sixty I didn't seen death hanging around every corner. I was able to cook dinner and be proud of it. I hated doing laundry, so I folded and put away *fast* to get it over with. I wasn't unsteady on my feet in my own house.
I wasn't decrepit, and now I am.
This study is bullshit. And it probably will result in R tampering w/ SS and Medicare.