Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(64,713 posts)
Wed May 14, 2025, 04:44 PM May 14

James Carver spent 36 years in prison after he was convicted of setting one of the deadliest fires in Mass. history.

Reposted by Chris Geidner

Andrew Quemere‬
‪@andrewqmr.bsky.social‬
· 3h
My latest for
@theappeal.org
:

James Carver spent 36 years in prison after he was convicted of setting one of the deadliest fires in #Massachusetts history. But after reviewing new scientific evidence, a judge set him free.

“They took my life away for nothing,” Carver said.

“They took my life away for nothing.”
James Carver spent 36 years in prison for allegedly setting one of the deadliest fires in Massachusetts history.
theappeal.org

May 14, 2025 at 12:50 PM/excerpt]

My latest for @theappeal.org:

James Carver spent 36 years in prison after he was convicted of setting one of the deadliest fires in #Massachusetts history. But after reviewing new scientific evidence, a judge set him free.

“They took my life away for nothing,” Carver said.

Andrew Quemere (@andrewqmr.bsky.social) 2025-05-14T16:50:53.238Z
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
James Carver spent 36 years in prison after he was convicted of setting one of the deadliest fires in Mass. history. (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves May 14 OP
There isn't enough money in MA to compensate him for all he lost. Sad. LoisB May 14 #1
And, yet, families of the victims are still certain of his guilt... regnaD kciN May 14 #2

regnaD kciN

(27,059 posts)
2. And, yet, families of the victims are still certain of his guilt...
Wed May 14, 2025, 06:45 PM
May 14

…which proves that “innocent until proven guilty” is a necessary legal maxim, because it is the natural reaction of those involved in a case to not only assume “guilty until proven innocent,” but “guilty even after being proven innocent.”

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»James Carver spent 36 yea...