Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BootinUp

(51,320 posts)
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 08:24 AM 2 hrs ago

We Told You So: The Costs of Attacking Iran Far Outweigh the Benefits

Trump says he was surprised by Iran's response to his attacks. He shouldn't have been. For years, experts have warned of the catastrophic risks.

Joe Cirincione
Mar 31, 2026

Donald Trump says he was surprised by Iran’s reactions to his attacks. “Nobody thought they were going to hit” the Gulf countries, he claimed.

Nonsense. Iran’s actions were completely predictable, and in fact, have long been predicted.

Conservatives in Washington have been talking about attacking Iran ever since a 1979 popular revolution overthrew the dictatorial Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi placed on the Peacock Throne in 1953 by the United States and the United Kingdom. For just as long, experts have warned of the foolishness of such a war. Every president from Ronald Reagan on concluded that the costs far outweighed the risks.

One of the peak campaigns for war on Iran occurred in the 2010-2015 period when President Barack Obama sought a diplomatic solution to Iran’s growing nuclear program.

I was then president of Ploughshares Fund. It was then a global security foundation, funding and connecting experts and advocates in effective, collective campaigns. One of the projects we funded was a report by nationally recognized military and diplomatic leaders to weigh the benefits and costs of military action against Iran.

Published in 2012, the report helped create political space for the successful diplomacy Obama undertook. The next year, Secretary of State John Kerry led a team of highly qualified experts to negotiate an interim agreement (finalized in 2015) that successful blocked all of Iran’s pathway to a bomb.

If Donald Trump had not pulled out of that deal in 2018, Iran would not pose a nuclear threat today. It would not have 440 kilograms of 60 percent enriched uranium that it could spin in advanced centrifuges into material for the cores of a bombs within weeks. It prevented an Iran Bomb and an Iran War.

Below, is part of the executive summary of the report. It is followed by excerpts from the full report on the costs of war with Iran.

Continued
https://open.substack.com/pub/joecirincione/p/we-told-you-so-the-costs-of-attacking
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Dave Bowman

(7,153 posts)
2. Of course he was surprised, he's an ignorant fool surrounded by idiots who won't dare contradict him.
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 08:37 AM
1 hr ago

That's one of the reasons his stupid idol Adolf crashed and burned, he thought that he was brilliant while just being an average moron when it came to military strategy.

Can the Reaper hurry up, please?

wcmagumba

(6,176 posts)
5. Crazy to attack Iran, I went to middle school with a couple of Iranian brothers whose family escaped the Shah, I'm 69...
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 08:45 AM
1 hr ago

They were cool and funny guys. Glad I knew them...I remember that song,

Irish_Dem

(81,257 posts)
6. Trump only considers the benefits to himself personally.
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 08:59 AM
1 hr ago

He had no risk at all, and everything to benefit.
Steal all of Iran's oil, land, assets.

The US military swings the deal for him.

Trump pays nothing, has no personal risk.

Farmer-Rick

(12,667 posts)
7. He was going to extort them
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 10:18 AM
6 min ago

For oil or other wealth to line his own pockets like he did Venezuela.

But the Iranian people dared to fight back.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»We Told You So: The Costs...