United Kingdom
Related: About this forumBreaking: Chancellor has quit
This is huge. Apparently he was told he could stay but he had to sack all his advisers. (that has to be cummings) Javid told Boris to sling his hook... bloody hell.
Control freaks being control freaks. Cummings is too big for his far right boots and I am for one delighted that Javid was not going to put up with that level of control from a non elected arsehole - putting his spies in number 11 - just guessing of course but it makes sense. Wonder how Boris is going to take this???? Hehe
Shit is getting real.
nitpicker
(7,153 posts)Mike 03
(18,028 posts)A couple of excerpts:
Such a move would amount to a repeat of what happened last year, when one of Javids advisers was sacked without his approval by Dominic Cummings, Boris Johnsons chief adviser.
A source close to Sajid Javid has confirmed that he has resigned. The source told the Press Association.
[Javid] has turned down the job of chancellor of the exchequer.
The prime minister said he had to fire all his special advisers and replace them with Number 10 special advisers to make it one team.
The chancellor said no self-respecting minister would accept those terms.
BlueMTexpat
(15,519 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)But this is a bad thing, I assume . .
Also, how is the economy there? Also, BoJo, like shithole here is now deporting citizens who are from other cultures/races?
Soph0571
(9,685 posts)He was seen as a steady state chancellor ... it is very shocking. No one was expecting it.
Mike 03
(18,028 posts)When you tell a professional, "You can stay but all your attendants and assistants have to go" what can you in good conscience call it but being fired?
Imagine saying that to a Judge, or a chief surgeon.
Soph0571
(9,685 posts)Seemingly they expected him to accept the changes and carry on. The PM did not expect the resignation, the expected him to be a yes man. They were wrong.
Mike 03
(18,028 posts)They expected him to accept those terms.
Thank you for clarifying.
I'm just so shocked.
Soph0571
(9,685 posts)They just want yes men... and I mean men. Good on the Chancellor for walking. We know have a very junior minister taking the job. He will be the perfect yes man
Mike 03
(18,028 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(102,961 posts)who seems to be trying to control all the special advisers in the government, and a lot of the permanent civil service too. Cameron seemed to have a good personal relationship with Osborne, and gave him real control of the Treasury, which would have included appointing his own advisers.
dawg day
(7,947 posts)Bootlickers everyone.
Mike 03
(18,028 posts)Rishi Sunak appointed chancellor
Sunaks rise up the ranks has been extraordinary. He has been chief secretary to the Treasury since last summer, but technically he was not even a member of the cabinet; he was just a minister with the right to attend. Being chancellor is his first full cabinet job.
Soph0571
(9,685 posts)He is far to inexperienced to stand up to the centralised power in Number 10.
Mike 03
(18,028 posts)Downing Street has now started tweeting about the reshuffle, starting with confirmation that Dominic Raab, Michael Gove and Priti Patel are all staying in post.
It is not clear yet whether Gove will get any additional responsibilities as part of Cabinet Office portfolio.
Soph0571
(9,685 posts)Brexit negotiations would be my guess
Patel is so far right she is practically falling off the side of the planet. That suits them pandering to to the Brexit little englander.
Mike 03
(18,028 posts)Lonestarblue
(12,198 posts)After seeing the utter chaos and dishonesty we have had from Trump, a man despised in the UK, their citizens voted for Boris, Trumps political twin. Both are dishonest politicians who will always put their own power above the needs of their respective countries and will literally do anything, legal or not, to keep that power.
Putin must be thrilled. He has Trump in place to destabilize and destroy our democratic government and Johnson/Brexit wrecking the near future of the UK. I wonder which major country he will attack next.
Mike 03
(18,028 posts)marble falls
(62,959 posts)Soph0571
(9,685 posts)But more than that it is the tightening of the power grip of the PMs office. Traditionally the Chancellor has been rather independent from policy makers - this is about to change. It is worrying.
marble falls
(62,959 posts)LeftishBrit
(41,318 posts)This is basically constructive dismissal. By the great Emperor Dominic 1. As many have been saying, it's ironic that so many people worry about being ruled by 'unelected bureaucrats' in Brussels, while accepting the rule of an unelected bureacrat at home.