Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
United Kingdom
Related: About this forumIan McEwan: Brexit, the most pointless, masochistic ambition in our country's history, is done
He's a great writer, and this is an excellent summary:
Its done. A triumph of dogged negotiation by May then, briefly, Johnson, has fulfilled the most pointless, masochistic ambition ever dreamed of in the history of these islands. The rest of the world, presidents Putin and Trump excepted, have watched on in astonishment and dismay. A majority voted in December for parties which supported a second referendum. But those parties failed lamentably to make common cause. We must pack up our tents, perhaps to the sound of church bells, and hope to begin the 15-year trudge, back towards some semblance of where we were yesterday with our multiple trade deals, security, health and scientific co-operation and a thousand other useful arrangements.
The only certainty is that well be asking ourselves questions for a very long time. Set aside for a moment Vote Leaves lies, dodgy funding, Russian involvement or the toothless Electoral Commission. Consider instead the magic dust. How did a matter of such momentous constitutional, economic and cultural consequence come to be settled by a first-past-the-post vote and not by a super-majority? A parliamentary paper (see Briefing 07212) at the time of the 2015 Referendum Act hinted at the reason: because the referendum was merely advisory. It enables the electorate to voice an opinion. How did advisory morph into binding? By that blinding dust thrown in our eyes from right and left by populist hands.
...
What did we learn in our blindness? That those not flourishing within the status quo had no good reason to vote for it; that our prolonged parliamentary chaos derived from an ill-posed yes-no question to which there were a score of answers; that the long-evolved ecology of the EU has profoundly shaped the flora of our nations landscape and to rip these plants out will be brutal; that what was once called a hard Brexit became soft by contrast with the threatened no-deal that even now persists; that any mode of departure, by the governments own estimate, will shrink the economy; that we have a gift for multiple and bitter division young against old, cities against the country, graduates against early school-leavers, Scotland and Northern Ireland against England and Wales; that all past, present and future international trade deals or treaties are a compromise with sovereignty, as is our signature on the Paris accords, or our membership of Nato, and that therefore Take Back Control was the emptiest, most cynical promise of this sorry season.
...
There is much that is historically unjust about the British state, but very little of that injustice derives from the EU. Brussels didnt insist that we neglect the post-industrial towns of the Midlands and the north; or demand that we let wages stagnate, or permit multimillion handouts to the CEOs of failing companies, or prefer shareholder value over the social good, or run our health service, social care and Sure Start into the ground, close 600 police stations and let the fabric of our state schools decay.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/feb/01/brexit-pointless-masochistic-ambition-history-done
The only certainty is that well be asking ourselves questions for a very long time. Set aside for a moment Vote Leaves lies, dodgy funding, Russian involvement or the toothless Electoral Commission. Consider instead the magic dust. How did a matter of such momentous constitutional, economic and cultural consequence come to be settled by a first-past-the-post vote and not by a super-majority? A parliamentary paper (see Briefing 07212) at the time of the 2015 Referendum Act hinted at the reason: because the referendum was merely advisory. It enables the electorate to voice an opinion. How did advisory morph into binding? By that blinding dust thrown in our eyes from right and left by populist hands.
...
What did we learn in our blindness? That those not flourishing within the status quo had no good reason to vote for it; that our prolonged parliamentary chaos derived from an ill-posed yes-no question to which there were a score of answers; that the long-evolved ecology of the EU has profoundly shaped the flora of our nations landscape and to rip these plants out will be brutal; that what was once called a hard Brexit became soft by contrast with the threatened no-deal that even now persists; that any mode of departure, by the governments own estimate, will shrink the economy; that we have a gift for multiple and bitter division young against old, cities against the country, graduates against early school-leavers, Scotland and Northern Ireland against England and Wales; that all past, present and future international trade deals or treaties are a compromise with sovereignty, as is our signature on the Paris accords, or our membership of Nato, and that therefore Take Back Control was the emptiest, most cynical promise of this sorry season.
...
There is much that is historically unjust about the British state, but very little of that injustice derives from the EU. Brussels didnt insist that we neglect the post-industrial towns of the Midlands and the north; or demand that we let wages stagnate, or permit multimillion handouts to the CEOs of failing companies, or prefer shareholder value over the social good, or run our health service, social care and Sure Start into the ground, close 600 police stations and let the fabric of our state schools decay.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/feb/01/brexit-pointless-masochistic-ambition-history-done
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ian McEwan: Brexit, the most pointless, masochistic ambition in our country's history, is done (Original Post)
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2020
OP
The value of Britain's money dropped 20% in the days after the Brexit vote.
Midnight Writer
Feb 2020
#1
Midnight Writer
(23,287 posts)1. The value of Britain's money dropped 20% in the days after the Brexit vote.
Everyone voted to lose one fifth of their own wealth overnight. Like voting for a punishing recession for your own country.