Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(120,025 posts)
Sun Apr 6, 2025, 08:35 AM Apr 6

How this $25 billion pipeline secures Canada's independence - CaspianReport



Amid #Trump’s rhetoric, there is a growing push to expand #Canada’s pipeline network, with #EnergyEast and #NorthernGateway as key projects that can secure its economic and political interests.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How this $25 billion pipeline secures Canada's independence - CaspianReport (Original Post) TexasTowelie Apr 6 OP
I would rather Canada or any country spend more on a renewable energy infrastructure. Crowman2009 Apr 6 #1
Tar sands. applegrove Apr 6 #4
What I fight for is our land. And this land ain't worth a shit if it's too toxic to live on. Magoo48 Apr 6 #2
This Would Be A Knee Jerk Reaction modrepub Apr 6 #3

Crowman2009

(3,045 posts)
1. I would rather Canada or any country spend more on a renewable energy infrastructure.
Sun Apr 6, 2025, 08:57 AM
Apr 6

Regardless of which nation, it's still toxic sludge that will spill if a pipeline breaks down. Especially if it's from corrosive oil shale.

Magoo48

(6,194 posts)
2. What I fight for is our land. And this land ain't worth a shit if it's too toxic to live on.
Sun Apr 6, 2025, 09:05 AM
Apr 6

I am an environmentalist before I am anything else.

modrepub

(3,809 posts)
3. This Would Be A Knee Jerk Reaction
Sun Apr 6, 2025, 09:09 AM
Apr 6

This is a huge investment. Large NG cracking plants are on the order $10B and need a lot of government subsidies to make them economical given the plants could take up to a decade to build (and there's some uncertainty if they'd be profitable that far out in the future). Building pipelines this long is expensive and risky. Large government buy ins would be needed with no guarantee that this would be payed off on profits alone.

Which begs the question, would the resources necessary to bring this project to fruition be better spent on something else?

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Canada»How this $25 billion pipe...