Data centers under scrutiny by CA lawmakers as fears rise about health and energy impacts

[quaint]

LATimes

Data centers have existed for decades but are rapidly changing and expanding due to the worldwide boom in artificial intelligence, or AI as it’s known. States and communities nationwide have started pushing back, citing concerns that the projects could strain power grids, increase utility bills and have negative health and environmental impacts.

In California, state legislators are debating how to protect residents and natural resources without creating so much red tape that developers go elsewhere, taking their jobs and taxable earnings with them.

“We can be supportive of innovation and a technology that is needed but also protect our communities and our health and our environment,” said state Sen. Steve Padilla (D-San Diego). “We can do both at the same time.”

The California Legislature is considering bills to prohibit the projects from being exempted from the state’s stringent environmental law and to impose new tariffs on new major energy users that strain power supplies. Lawmakers also have proposed restrictions on new data centers, requiring companies to provide verifiable estimates on expected water and energy usage before they can be granted a business permit.

(my emphasis)
We don't need no effing data centers.

[Auggie]

1. +1 ...

The only reason I could possibly fathom allowing some in California is that we're poised to regulate them better than, say, Texas. But even then, the power grid here is just about as fragile as anywhere else.

I agree, quaint. We don't effing need them. But they're coming anyway. Regulate and tax.