Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Old Crank

(5,046 posts)
Wed Jan 1, 2025, 09:05 AM Wednesday

Hasselblad v Fujifilm

The dangers of rabbit holes...

I ran into this quick comparison of a digital Hasselblad v a Fuji film tx4 (35mm equiv. not their medium format)
The results on my screen with my eyes is really close. Of course you are limited to what normal screens display. If you make a living using a much larger format the Blad would be for you. For work on the web the Fuji holds up very well indeed.
at least in his test.

https://www.tomsguide.com/cameras-photography/mirrorless-cameras/i-tested-an-dollar8000-hasselblad-camera-against-a-dollar1000-fujifilm-heres-what-happened#xenforo-comments-529108

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hasselblad v Fujifilm (Original Post) Old Crank Wednesday OP
Summary: For posting stuff on the web, usonian Wednesday #1

usonian

(14,923 posts)
1. Summary: For posting stuff on the web,
Wed Jan 1, 2025, 11:43 AM
Wednesday

Last edited Wed Jan 1, 2025, 12:40 PM - Edit history (1)



An iphone is overkill for most, and I reduce everything, including iphone photos to 1 MB or less, for the convenience of DU viewers, especially on long threads.

Being a very old photographer myself, I thought you meant OG Hasselblad and Fuji cameras.

Now, I ask. What if Napoleon ...

"

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»Hasselblad v Fujifilm