Jackie Kennedy's ex-Secret Service agent makes new claim about the JFK assassination - CNN

[TexasTowelie]

Paul Landis, a former Secret Service agent assigned to former first lady Jackie Kennedy, discusses claims he made in a new book that raises questions about the so-called "magic bullet" theory in the assassination of former President John F. Kennedy.

[AverageOldGuy]

1. Oh, please.

Will this bullshit never end?

[robbob]

3. What bullshit?

In 1979 the house select committee on assassinations concluded based on forensic analysis of recordings from the plaza that at least 4 shots were fired, one from the so-called grassy knoll. This is now an official government conclusion.

[czarjak]

2. Whatever happened wasn't happenstance.

[twodogsbarking]

4. How dare anyone question The Warren Commission Report.

I always did.

[oswaldactedalone]

5. Nothing to see here

Let’s move along to the next bogus claim.

[jaxexpat]

6. The truth was shot dead by Union troops, trying to escape a burning barn.

The rumors were hanged shortly thereafter.

[Kid Berwyn]

7. What else did Secret Service lie about?

What else did Warren Commission fail to examine? Who else didn’t they interview?

The nation has not been the same since Nov. 22, 1963. Now this guy’s book will dominate news coverage of the 60th anniversary.

[BootinUp]

8. an 88 year old lying sack of shit. nt

[Wonder Why]

9. So he waited 60 years to come out with this?

[BootinUp]

10. "Former Agent Hill said Landis reached out to him to endorse his new book ... "

Former Agent Hill said Landis reached out to him to endorse his new book, but he says there was so much misinformation and untruth that he declined.

https://www.kfyrtv.com/2023/09/11/former-secret-service-agent-reacts-colleagues-changing-testimony-jfk-assassination/

[markpkessinger]

11. The problem is that after 60 years . . .

. . . there is no way to know how reliable the man's memory of the events is. The fact is, NO ONE's memory is as good as they think it is. And memory, far from being a reliable record, is malleable, and can change over time, all while the person continues to believe he remembers things exactly as they happened. So, he could genuinely think this is what he remembers, and yet it could be completely incorrect. And the fact that what he is saying now doesn't quite jibe with what he said at the time doesn't exactly inspire confidence. So coming out with this now is effectively useless.