Tim Walz has some sharp critiques of the Dem 2024 campaign - Politico
There were also efforts to curb some of his signature lines, including casting Trump and Republicans as weird, which slipped out of Walzs speeches.
He was encouraged to stop focusing on the weird criticism, said another former Harris aide. I think it is fair to ask whether, even if weird wasnt quite right, his instinct about how to approach Trump, to make him seem small, and a huckster, wasnt closer to correct than the more self-serious tone that may have made us sound too in defense of the status quo.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/08/tim-walz-2024-campaign-critiques-00219718
As a younger voter, I wish we would have seen the riskier campaign path. The paralysis of "playing it safe" is an error in itself, especially now that the Overton Window for politics has drastically shifted. More recently, Gavin Newsom created a podcast to have long-form discussions with people of opposing viewpoints. While this is a great step in the right direction, Democrats are behind the puck on modern media messaging.
One of the sticking points in my mind that made Tim Walz relatable was when he livestreamed on AOC's Twitch channel playing Crazy Taxi. Reaching out to younger voters in this way means a lot more than a scripted roundtable interview. Much the same, unscripted content in general, such as podcasts where Democrats can truly speak without formulated talking points and staffers whispering in their ears, would make an immense difference. Listening to the opinions of people who voted for Trump, the idea of a political figurehead talking candidly and off-script seems to be more attractive than listening to a speech read passionately from a teleprompter. I think we can learn a lot from that


Blue Owl
(55,940 posts)Whereas JD Vance was an utter idiot, hated by everyone, and less popular than a sexually transmitted disease .
Deuxcents
(21,854 posts)We need to hear from you and those like minded as changes are needed, imo.
LostOne4Ever
(9,645 posts)Only Harris decimating Trump in that debate can compare!
dchill
(42,048 posts)There was a huge element of lying and self delusion in the democratic side. We thought we had a shot! But-- Biden was disliked even loathed - unfairly, but there it was. The election was largely decided early in the year I'm afraid and that debate and Trump's assassination attempt sealed it.
But ... but there was still a chance. Just a narrow one probably. But that campaign just couldn't quite do it. Played too safe. Thought it could run 2022 over again when it turned out that was all over. Was that bad judgment or bad guesswork? Bad consulting? I am sorry to have to say a lot goes back to the candidates. Kamala is intrinsically a cautious and meticulous person (we know her well in CA). This was the moment for a rampager and shoot for the moon gambler (are there any of these on the Demo side?) Walz was part of that but needed Kamala to be a YOLO candidate. Just my swag.
LymphocyteLover
(7,822 posts)had a chance, since the media totally was in for Dump, but playing it safe sure didn't help
They also needed some serious attack ads
LymphocyteLover
(7,822 posts)too scripted, being dialed back, not willing to really say what they think
Seriously FUCK the advisors that told Walz to not call the MAGAts weird