Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(123,364 posts)
Tue Nov 26, 2024, 09:04 PM Nov 2024

Constitution in Crisis #6: Playing a Bad Hand Well

Jack Smith filed motions yesterday to dismiss the two federal cases he and his team at the DOJ have painstakingly put together over two years. They have defended these cases against spurious Trump attacks, a hostile and lawless District Court, a fairly mind-boggling Supreme Court opinion on presidential immunity, and many other bumps in the road. Throwing the two cases away must have felt like Miriam putting Moses in the Nile.

But Smith has made the best of a very bad hand dealt by this crazy concatenation of forces, culminating in Trump’s victory. Given the cards he had to play, he’s played them smartly. Even as Trump escapes punishment—a foregone conclusion as of November 5—Smith has left Trump in a position far from the fully triumphant one he believes he deserves.

Smith wisely began this process in the DC District Court before Judge Chutkan. His six-page motion scored some important points. Trump will try to erase them when he takes office, but it’s not clear that he can.

First, Smith made it clear that the government had lost no confidence in the charges against Trump: “The government’s position on the merits of the defendant’s prosecution has not changed. But the circumstances have: as a result of the election...” He again stated for the record that the Department of Justice stands behind the extremely serious charges in the case—surely the most scathing charges ever leveled at a president.

https://harrylitman.substack.com/p/constitution-in-crisis-6-playing

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Constitution in Crisis #6: Playing a Bad Hand Well (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2024 OP
MIriam was his sister. Igel Nov 2024 #1

Igel

(36,771 posts)
1. MIriam was his sister.
Tue Nov 26, 2024, 10:28 PM
Nov 2024

Thought his mother, Jochebed, put him in the river in the story in Exodus. Not Miriam.

In other commentary, the case against the other two defendants could be subject to motion to dismiss. The presumption that such cases are usually dismissed might not hold, but probably would. The appeal over Smith's status, should it not be resolved, might also be subject to a request to dismiss.

Then Cannon's decision would stand and it's unclear if the charges against the other 2 defendants in the case could be revived. And, if not, they couldn't be easily flipped using any kind of pressure or deal as a pot sweetener.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Constitution in Crisis #6...