DOJ cannot provide unredacted Epstein files for New Mexico probe
Source: Detroit News/Reuters
Updated July 15, 2026, 8:19 p.m. ET
The U.S. Department of Justice said on Wednesday it was prohibited by law from releasing unredacted files on Jeffrey Epstein requested by New Mexico, escalating a feud with state officials investigating the late sex offender. New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez released a letter on Tuesday accusing the DOJ of deliberately obstructing the state's criminal probe of Epstein by failing to hand over the files.
Federal law, court orders, and privacy protections for victims and witnesses do not allow us to release millions of unredacted documents," a U.S. Justice Department spokesperson said in a statement. "We will continue to follow federal law and the court orders that are in place."
In February, the Democratic-run state re-opened an investigation into activities at Epstein's former ranch, south of the capital Santa Fe, where he is accused of abusing women and girls for nearly three decades.
In response to the state's request that month for unredacted files, Torrez said the U.S. Attorney's Office for New Mexico on July 10 provided 31 pages of documents that had already been made public, contained redacted material that was unusable or were photocopies of local news stories.
Read more: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/nation/2026/07/15/trumps-doj-cant-release-unredacted-files-for-nm-epstein-probe/90933674007/
REFERENCES
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143614707
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143619421
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143671027
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143693263
hookaleft
(1,575 posts)The Epstein Transparency Act demands that they be released with redactions only of the survivors.
24601
(4,151 posts)law: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4405/text
Information about the survivors is included in the first category.
Verbatim text addressing withholdings:
(1) The Attorney general may withhold or redact the segregable portions of records that
(A) contain personally identifiable information of victims or victims personal and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;
(B) depict or contain child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) as defined under 18 U.S.C. 2256 and prohibited under 18 U.S.C. 22522252A;
(C) would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution, provided that such withholding is narrowly tailored and temporary;
(D) depict or contain images of death, physical abuse, or injury of any person; or
(E) contain information specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive order.
AllaN01Bear
(30,345 posts)mopinko
(74,346 posts)which dont exist. sure, sure, theyre gonna obey court orders.
Wiz Imp
(11,089 posts)to be adjudicated in court? And when the DOJ loses, how long will their appeals take? The underlying question is what specifically are they hiding and why? It's clearly something really awful.
IrishAfricanAmerican
(4,559 posts)Wiz Imp
(11,089 posts)Every single person who was involved in Epstein's sex trafficking needs to be held accountable. Beyond that, I wouldn't count on being able to run out the clock on this. When this sees a courtroom, the DOJ will definitely be forced to turn over this info.
dlk
(13,536 posts)It is doubtful we will be seeing any more of the Epstein files and there will be no further investigations or prosecutions. Its likely any remaining files have already been destroyed. Trumps criminal takeover of the DOJ is a fait accompli.
purr-rat beauty
(1,797 posts)Someone has them for good keeping
blackmail is effective foreign policy as we see
purr-rat beauty
(1,797 posts)"Meh, A felony here, a felony there, a raped child here, a dead child there..."
I don't see why it wouldn't be perfectly acceptable for the citizens of this nation to grab these fucks by their necks and give them a taste of their own medicine. A breaking point is coming.
GiqueCee
(5,291 posts)... that countermand the court order that the files be released UNREDACTED, save for the exclusion of victims' names, you lying fucks!
Wonder Why
(7,589 posts)sakabatou
(46,638 posts)ChicagoTeamster
(1,608 posts)Because everybody knows by now, when you work for Trump, you eventually wind up under the bus. So they have to make as much as they can before they get to the last bus stop.
Cheezoholic
(4,242 posts)Crickets on that aspect. If they let them move forward with whatever the "new owners" wanted to do, it's destroying a potential crime scene.
travelingthrulife
(5,792 posts)further legal investigation, not to the public.
Endless lies with these monsters.
ashredux
(3,023 posts)Im surprised I just havent had a big bonfire
SamuelAdams
(478 posts)The Republican party and 40% or so of Americans are just fine with it. But we have been told for a decade we need to embrace these people and consider their feelings.