Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(174,509 posts)
Thu Jul 16, 2026, 06:50 AM 4 hrs ago

DOJ cannot provide unredacted Epstein files for New Mexico probe

Source: Detroit News/Reuters

Updated July 15, 2026, 8:19 p.m. ET


The U.S. Department of Justice said on Wednesday it was prohibited by law from releasing unredacted files on Jeffrey Epstein requested by New Mexico, escalating a feud with state officials investigating the late sex offender. New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez released a letter on Tuesday accusing the DOJ of deliberately obstructing the state's criminal probe of Epstein by failing to hand over the files.

“Federal law, court orders, and privacy protections for victims and witnesses do not allow us to release millions of unredacted documents," a U.S. Justice Department spokesperson said in a statement. "We will continue to follow federal law and the court orders that are in place."

In February, the Democratic-run state re-opened an investigation into activities at Epstein's former ranch, south of the capital Santa Fe, where he is accused of abusing women and girls for nearly three decades.

In response to the state's request that month for unredacted files, Torrez said the U.S. Attorney's Office for New Mexico on July 10 provided 31 pages of documents that had already been made public, contained redacted material that was unusable or were photocopies of local news stories.

Read more: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/nation/2026/07/15/trumps-doj-cant-release-unredacted-files-for-nm-epstein-probe/90933674007/



REFERENCES

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143614707
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143619421
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143671027
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143693263
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DOJ cannot provide unredacted Epstein files for New Mexico probe (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 4 hrs ago OP
That is such bullshit hookaleft 4 hrs ago #1
Someone gave you bad information. There are five categories of information that may be withheld. Here is the link to the 24601 3 hrs ago #9
beat me to it.:):):) AllaN01Bear 2 hrs ago #13
oh, sure, court orders, mopinko 3 hrs ago #2
The big question now is how long it will take the coming lawsuit demanding the release of this info Wiz Imp 3 hrs ago #3
They're going to run out the clock until he dies. IrishAfricanAmerican 1 hr ago #16
Who, Trump? This is much bigger than Trump. Wiz Imp 40 min ago #18
Trump's DOJ will do anything and everything to protect him, and cover up this massive crime dlk 3 hrs ago #4
They're out there purr-rat beauty 2 hrs ago #10
Obstruction, Contempt, Conspiracy... purr-rat beauty 3 hrs ago #5
Show us the statutes... GiqueCee 3 hrs ago #6
They use the law as an excuse? They don't know what the word law even means. Wonder Why 3 hrs ago #7
Dump's DOJ should rename itself "The Injustice League" sakabatou 3 hrs ago #8
No surprises here. They know who's in the files. They're either being blackmailed, or bribed, or both. ChicagoTeamster 2 hrs ago #11
Have they started razing this place yet? Dug it all up yet? I heard that was the intent then may have been stopped Cheezoholic 2 hrs ago #12
Aren't these the records they took from New Mexico? They are handing it over for travelingthrulife 2 hrs ago #14
Duh 🙄. Of course not. Trump's names all over the damn file. ashredux 2 hrs ago #15
They are going out of their way to protect child predators. SamuelAdams 1 hr ago #17

hookaleft

(1,575 posts)
1. That is such bullshit
Thu Jul 16, 2026, 07:12 AM
4 hrs ago

The Epstein Transparency Act demands that they be released with redactions only of the survivors.

24601

(4,151 posts)
9. Someone gave you bad information. There are five categories of information that may be withheld. Here is the link to the
Thu Jul 16, 2026, 08:45 AM
3 hrs ago

law: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4405/text

Information about the survivors is included in the first category.

Verbatim text addressing withholdings:

(1) The Attorney general may withhold or redact the segregable portions of records that—

(A) contain personally identifiable information of victims or victims’ personal and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;

(B) depict or contain child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) as defined under 18 U.S.C. 2256 and prohibited under 18 U.S.C. 2252–2252A;

(C) would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution, provided that such withholding is narrowly tailored and temporary;

(D) depict or contain images of death, physical abuse, or injury of any person; or

(E) contain information specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive order.

Wiz Imp

(11,089 posts)
3. The big question now is how long it will take the coming lawsuit demanding the release of this info
Thu Jul 16, 2026, 08:00 AM
3 hrs ago

to be adjudicated in court? And when the DOJ loses, how long will their appeals take? The underlying question is what specifically are they hiding and why? It's clearly something really awful.

Wiz Imp

(11,089 posts)
18. Who, Trump? This is much bigger than Trump.
Thu Jul 16, 2026, 11:07 AM
40 min ago

Every single person who was involved in Epstein's sex trafficking needs to be held accountable. Beyond that, I wouldn't count on being able to run out the clock on this. When this sees a courtroom, the DOJ will definitely be forced to turn over this info.

dlk

(13,536 posts)
4. Trump's DOJ will do anything and everything to protect him, and cover up this massive crime
Thu Jul 16, 2026, 08:25 AM
3 hrs ago

It is doubtful we will be seeing any more of the Epstein files and there will be no further investigations or prosecutions. It’s likely any remaining files have already been destroyed. Trump’s criminal takeover of the DOJ is a fait accompli.

purr-rat beauty

(1,797 posts)
10. They're out there
Thu Jul 16, 2026, 08:49 AM
2 hrs ago

Someone has them for good keeping

blackmail is effective foreign policy as we see

purr-rat beauty

(1,797 posts)
5. Obstruction, Contempt, Conspiracy...
Thu Jul 16, 2026, 08:40 AM
3 hrs ago

"Meh, A felony here, a felony there, a raped child here, a dead child there..."

I don't see why it wouldn't be perfectly acceptable for the citizens of this nation to grab these fucks by their necks and give them a taste of their own medicine. A breaking point is coming.


GiqueCee

(5,291 posts)
6. Show us the statutes...
Thu Jul 16, 2026, 08:42 AM
3 hrs ago

... that countermand the court order that the files be released UNREDACTED, save for the exclusion of victims' names, you lying fucks!

ChicagoTeamster

(1,608 posts)
11. No surprises here. They know who's in the files. They're either being blackmailed, or bribed, or both.
Thu Jul 16, 2026, 08:55 AM
2 hrs ago

Because everybody knows by now, when you work for Trump, you eventually wind up under the bus. So they have to make as much as they can before they get to the last bus stop.

Cheezoholic

(4,242 posts)
12. Have they started razing this place yet? Dug it all up yet? I heard that was the intent then may have been stopped
Thu Jul 16, 2026, 09:02 AM
2 hrs ago

Crickets on that aspect. If they let them move forward with whatever the "new owners" wanted to do, it's destroying a potential crime scene.

travelingthrulife

(5,792 posts)
14. Aren't these the records they took from New Mexico? They are handing it over for
Thu Jul 16, 2026, 09:09 AM
2 hrs ago

further legal investigation, not to the public.

Endless lies with these monsters.

ashredux

(3,023 posts)
15. Duh 🙄. Of course not. Trump's names all over the damn file.
Thu Jul 16, 2026, 09:16 AM
2 hrs ago

I’m surprised I just haven’t had a big bonfire

SamuelAdams

(478 posts)
17. They are going out of their way to protect child predators.
Thu Jul 16, 2026, 10:19 AM
1 hr ago

The Republican party and 40% or so of Americans are just fine with it. But we have been told for a decade we need to embrace these people and consider their feelings.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»DOJ cannot provide unreda...