Air Force B-52 bomber crashes shortly after takeoff at Edwards Air Force Base in California
Source: ABC News
June 15, 2026, 4:08 PM
An Air Force B-52 Stratofortress bomber crashed shortly after takeoff at Edwards Air Force Base in California on Monday, the base said. "Emergency crews immediately responded to the scene and the situation is ongoing," the base said in a statement. The crash was reported at about 11:20 a.m. local time. The base has closed the airfield and said all inbound planes are being diverted.
The Air Force and NASA conduct test flights of new and developmental aircraft at Edwards Air Force Base.
The B-52 Stratofortress -- which typically carries a crew of five -- is a long-range bomber first introduced in the 1950s that remains a central part of the U.S. military's air power. Built by Boeing, the aircraft is capable of carrying both conventional and nuclear weapons over long distances and has been used in conflicts ranging from Vietnam to operations in the Iran war.

A B-52H Stratofortress departs Edwards Air Force Base, June 25, 2025.
Chase Kohler/USAF, FILES
This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
Read more: https://abcnews.com/US/air-force-52-bomber-crashes-shortly-after-takeoff/story?id=133899844
Heard this on the radio as a breaking news.
Article updated.
Original article -
An Air Force B-52 Stratofortress bomber crashed shortly after takeoff at Edwards Air Force Base in California on Monday, the base said.
"Emergency crews immediately responded to the scene and the situation is ongoing," the base said in a statement. The Air Force and NASA conduct test flights of new and developmental aircraft at Edwards Air Force Base.
The B-52 Stratofortress -- which typically carries a crew of five -- is a long-range bomber first introduced in the 1950s that remains a central part of the U.S. military's air power. Built by Boeing, the aircraft is capable of carrying both conventional and nuclear weapons over long distances and has been used in conflicts ranging from Vietnam to operations in the Iran war.
This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
displacedvermoter
(5,163 posts)I wonder if a test related event? Hope crew survived, they go down hard do these big old things.
2naSalit
(104,467 posts)There is nothing left of that aircraft that isn't charred ashes. Seriously, nothing.
caraher
(6,368 posts)The first plane will receive new engines later this year.
displacedvermoter
(5,163 posts)I wonder how much more tinkering they can do. Much more complicated aircraft than the venerable A10, which keeps getting returned from scrap heap.
Good luck to those flying these very old remnants of an earlier time. Think Slim Pickens...
caraher
(6,368 posts)Yes, they're much older than their crews. But structurally sound - inspections can assure that.
The new engine plan is a result of the lack of spares or ability to make more of the original engines, as much as it is about performance. And it turns out to be a devilishly challenging retrofit (my son works on the engine project).
Ironically, its obsolescence as a bomber expected to penetrate modern air defenses seems to have assured its longevity as a bomb and missile truck.
But it does defy all common sense...
Bluetus
(3,236 posts)that we are afraid to use our B1s and B2, which are highly specializedand enormously expensive to lose. And it is not just the expenseI belieev major parts of their stealth tech are still classified, and have not been matched by other countries. So the Pentagon is happy to keep using the B-52s. They provide the lowest overall costs and offer the widest assortment of weapons. With the new engines, they are expected to be 30% more efficient, allowing them to stay in the air longer without requiring a tanker. They are trying to stretch them to 2050, which will put every remaining unit very near 100 years since it rolled off the line.
I don't think they are far enough along with this program to be doing flight testing. I may be wrong about that, but I thought that was to happen in the early 2030s.
LudwigPastorius
(15,197 posts)I am guessing this was a modified B-52, either carrying a new weapons system, or flying with a modified airframe to explore ways to extend the useful lifespan of the BUFFs.
Given the secretive nature of the work there, we may not find out exactly what happened.
BumRushDaShow
(173,112 posts)and there was basically nothing left of the plane except some pieces and a huge scorch mark along the perimeter of a runway. It's like it exploded on impact.
2naSalit
(104,467 posts)The crew did not survive since there was no way out of the aircraft.
C Moon
(13,807 posts)2naSalit
(104,467 posts)A little while ago, it had only been out for less than an hour. The military finally made it official, probably after contacting next of kin.
C Moon
(13,807 posts)irisblue
(38,089 posts)electric_blue68
(27,761 posts)Last edited Mon Jun 15, 2026, 06:44 PM - Edit history (1)
I knew someone who's relative flew these back in the 70's.
OnlinePoker
(6,171 posts)I know it's a coincidence, but kind of weird.
sdfernando
(6,135 posts)there aren't more crashes. Metal fatigue??
Bluetus
(3,236 posts)I guess the Pentagon doesn't have to meet the same standards that the FAA requires of commercial aircraft. It does make one wonder about the decision-making process at the Pentagon. The B1 has a payload of 37 tons and 6000 mile range. The B2 has a payload of 20 tons 7000 mi range. The B52 has a payload of 35 tons and 8800 mile range (about 10,000 miles after the upgrade).
In comparison, a stock Boeing 777 cargo plane caries 110 tons with a range of 5-6000 miles, depending on load. The B1 is supersonic and the B2 is extremely stealthy, so they are specialized aircraft, not comparable to a 777. But one would think it ought to be possible to have a 777 variant that would be better than a 70-year-old B52.
chowder66
(12,634 posts)Eight crew members are believed to be dead in a B-52 bomber crash shortly after takeoff from Edwards Air Force Base, northeast of Los Angeles, on Monday morning, the base said.
The B-52 Stratofortress was on a routine test mission that took off at 11:20 a.m. local time at the remote air base, officials said, and initial indications are that the crash was not survivable.
Emergency crews responded immediately to the crash involving the bomber which left a towering black plume in its wake and are still working as officials try to account for all personnel, the base said.
A press conference is scheduled for 4:15 p.m. local time, according to the base.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/15/us/b-52-crash-edwards-california
riversedge
(81,971 posts)RIP I feel for the friends and families also.
MeidasTouch
@meidastouch.com
· 24m
TRAGIC NEWS: Eight crew members are believed to have been killed after a U.S. Air Force B-52 Stratofortress crashed shortly after takeoff from Edwards Air Force Base in California during a routine test mission on Monday, according to officials.
TRAGIC NEWS: Eight crew members are believed to have been killed after a U.S. Air Force B-52 Stratofortress crashed shortly after takeoff from Edwards Air Force Base in California during a routine test mission on Monday, according to officials.
— MeidasTouch (@meidastouch.com) 2026-06-15T22:52:50.412Z
ultralite001
(2,772 posts)Holding the crew + their families in our ❤️💙💛...
riversedge
(81,971 posts)8 onboard Air Force B-52 bomber that crashed shortly after takeoff in California
— (@oceancalm.bsky.social) 2026-06-15T23:23:09.364Z
"Initial indications are that the crash was not survivable," the base said.ððð
abcnews.com/US/air-force...