Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(169,136 posts)
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 04:35 PM 7 hrs ago

Street preacher gets Supreme Court go-ahead for fight to protest at concerts

Source: Courthouse News Service

March 20, 2026


WASHINGTON (CN) — Despite a 30-year-old precedent by originalism’s chief architect, the Supreme Court ruled Friday to allow an evangelical street protester’s lawsuit against a city ordinance that limits protests around concert venues. Heck v. Humphrey , a 1994 ruling authored by the late Justice Antonin Scalia, typically bars defendants from using civil rights claims to undermine prior convictions. But Gabriel Olivier asked the Supreme Court to greenlight his suit against a Brandon, Mississippi, ordinance because he was only requesting prospective relief.

The high court agreed. In a unanimous ruling led by Justice Elena Kagan, a Barack Obama appointee, the court held that Olivier’s suit could proceed because he wasn’t trying to attack his old conviction or risk parallel litigation on his prior conduct.“The suit, after all, is not about what Olivier did in the past, and depends on no proof addressed to his prior conviction,” Kagan wrote. “Unlike in Heck , the suit merely attempts to prevent a future prosecution. So the Heck bar does not come into play.”

Olivier was arrested for demonstrating outside of a designated protest area at Brandon’s amphitheater before a Lee Brice concert in 2021. Olivier and other church colleagues instead stood at a busy intersection holding large signs that depicted aborted fetuses, using a loudspeaker to call patrons “whores” and “Jezebels.”

A municipal court issued a fine and put Olivier on unsupervised probation, as long as he didn’t violate the city ordinance for a year. Olivier didn’t appeal his conviction. While on probation, Olivier filed civil rights claims against the city, claiming the ordinance violated his First and 14th amendment rights.

Read more: https://courthousenews.com/street-preacher-gets-supreme-court-go-ahead-for-fight-to-protest-at-concerts/



REFERENCE - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143576370
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Street preacher gets Supreme Court go-ahead for fight to protest at concerts (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 7 hrs ago OP
I gots a right to call wimmings whores and Jezebels!! RussBLib 7 hrs ago #1
Unfortunately, free speech allows people to say things that others think obscene. Wonder Why 6 hrs ago #4
Only respected for RW lunatics wolfie001 5 hrs ago #6
Unfortunately we don't have hate speech laws. We should. 58Sunliner 29 min ago #9
News is always softening Quanto Magnus 7 hrs ago #2
It was a 9-0 ruling melm00se 7 hrs ago #3
Here's Mr. Olivier now.... CurtEastPoint 6 hrs ago #5
Well ain't he special. twodogsbarking 4 hrs ago #7
Yep Polybius 2 hrs ago #8
We need hate speech laws. Calling women whores is a threat to their well being. 58Sunliner 23 min ago #10

Wonder Why

(6,909 posts)
4. Unfortunately, free speech allows people to say things that others think obscene.
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 05:54 PM
6 hrs ago

I think his words are obscene but that's the price I am willing to pay for your and my right to say obscene things about the Fat Pig.

The ACLU has long fought for free speech.

A lot of Americans have died for that right.

wolfie001

(7,596 posts)
6. Only respected for RW lunatics
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 07:17 PM
5 hrs ago

Especially the religious wack-jobs. Liberal protestors can be shot on sight. With bullets, smoke grenades, lethal rubber bullets, tear gas, audio terror tools, ect. ect. Definitely one-sided because of the 6 piles of shit on the SC.

melm00se

(5,159 posts)
3. It was a 9-0 ruling
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 05:10 PM
7 hrs ago

The lower court rejected the case contrary to existing precedent under Heck v. Humphrey.

The Supreme Court, unanimously, said, "Nuh-uh. Olivier’s suit seeking purely prospective relief—an injunction stopping officials from enforcing an ordinance in the future—can proceed, notwithstanding Olivier’s prior conviction for violating that ordinance; Heck does not hold otherwise."

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-993_10n2.pdf


58Sunliner

(6,319 posts)
10. We need hate speech laws. Calling women whores is a threat to their well being.
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 11:57 PM
23 min ago

I bet he says some bullshit about punishing them which would be a threat and should be illegal.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Street preacher gets Supr...