Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(167,490 posts)
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 05:30 PM Friday

Trump says he will issue executive order to get voter-ID requirements before midterms

Last edited Fri Feb 13, 2026, 08:51 PM - Edit history (2)

Source: CNBC

Published Fri, Feb 13 2026 4:51 PM EST Updated 2 Hours Ago


President Donald Trump on Friday said he will issue an executive order "shortly" laying out the "legal reasons" for national voter-identification requirements. Trump, in posts late Friday to Truth Social, said he wants voter-ID laws implemented for the 2026 midterm elections, even though legislation mandating them appears poised to stall in Congress.

"The Democrats refuse to vote for Voter I.D., or Citizenship. The reason is very simple -- They want to continue to cheat in Elections," Trump posted to Truth Social.

"This was not what our Founders desired. I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, and will be presenting an irrefutable one in the very near future. There will be Voter I.D. for the Midterm Elections, whether approved by Congress or not!" he continued.

In a second post, published minutes after the first, Trump said, "If we can't get it through Congress, there are Legal reasons why this SCAM is not permitted. I will be presenting them shortly, in the form of an Executive Order."

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/13/trump-congress-voter-id-midterms.html



Article updated.

Previous article/headline -

Trump says he will issue executive order to get voter ID requirements before midterms


Published Fri, Feb 13 2026 4:51 PM EST Updated 8 Min Ago


President Donald Trump on Friday said he will "shortly" issue an executive order laying out the "legal reasons" for national voter-identification requirements.

Trump, in posts late Friday to Truth Social, said he wants voter-ID laws implemented for the 2026 midterm elections, even though legislation mandating them appears poised to stall in Congress.

"The Democrats refuse to vote for Voter I.D., or Citizenship. The reason is very simple -- They want to continue to cheat in Elections," Trump posted to Truth Social.

"This was not what our Founders desired. I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, and will be presenting an irrefutable one in the very near future. There will be Voter I.D. for the Midterm Elections, whether approved by Congress or not!" he continued.


This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump says he will issue executive order to get voter-ID requirements before midterms (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Friday OP
Doesn't work like that....... Lovie777 Friday #1
Different effect Lithos Friday #21
Either way, we MUST educate the public and especially the MEDIA. That is not how EOs work. Bluetus Friday #31
I like your words, which are true. chouchou Friday #34
Yes, nicely defined Roy Rolling Yesterday #39
And I should have mentioned the big 2 Bluetus 20 hrs ago #43
Executive orders are worthless for making laws about elections MacKasey Friday #2
all laws or orders are as effective as the ability to enforce them quakerboy Friday #24
Yes. All the arguments in here about how its unconstitutional, so it won't happen, are naive. LiberalLovinLug 16 hrs ago #46
What if the SC's six sycophants BlueKota Friday #28
He has "searched the depths of Legal Arguments" livetohike Friday #3
Right! If his sycophantic "aides" in legal matters didn't tell him Justice matters. Yesterday #37
The federal government does not control state elections or id requirements for the states... wcmagumba Friday #4
Let's think positive. He may, well, you know. twodogsbarking Friday #5
I know for sure, from all my friends here that what TSF is saying is bluestarone Friday #6
"researched the depths of legal arguments not yet articulated or vetted." onenote Friday #7
No there won't. Shut the fuck up, Donnie. paleotn Friday #8
Impotent POTUS says what? Fiendish Thingy Friday #9
unfortunately voter ID is popular. just what kind is the sticking point. here in hawaii one has to provide ID to msongs Friday #10
Here in Philly BumRushDaShow Friday #14
In January, trump's March executive order on elections was struck down LetMyPeopleVote Friday #11
The Constitution blocks presidents from changing election rules. LetMyPeopleVote Friday #12
It takes one to know one Puppyjive Friday #13
Just like it's the Gulf of America whether Congress wants it or not. JohnnyRingo Friday #15
Google uses it Polybius Friday #20
Yeah, and fuck them for that. I've avoided using google since they capitulated to the orange POS POTUS LymphocyteLover Friday #23
Same! n/t pazzyanne Friday #32
What do you use for navigation? Polybius 8 hrs ago #48
I use Apple Maps for directions on my phone, of course Apple has been just as bad as Google in LymphocyteLover 37 min ago #49
Google has monopoly suits against them. JohnnyRingo 23 hrs ago #41
It might not work that way but this will be his rationale for having ICE disrupt elections in Blue states and cities. ChicagoTeamster Friday #16
Judgment is coming, Mr. Trump Prairie Gates Friday #17
"...laying out the 'legal reasons' for national voter-identification requirements." BaronChocula Friday #18
Trump could not possibly have written that post. There are far too many multi syllable words in it. flashman13 Friday #19
Stephen Miller must be blowing smoke up his ass again Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Friday #22
I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, 3825-87867 Friday #25
Whatever Happened to STATES RIGHTS Mr.Bee Friday #26
Basically it's republican rights Tree Lady Yesterday #38
The Sharpie he uses to sign it will be worth more than the EO. He ought to read the Constitution. Vinca Friday #27
He thinks he is a king.... His dementia is getting worse. ashredux Friday #29
Prepare for disruption of mid-term elections. thought crime Friday #30
if this passes we need a GoFund Me to raise money to gopiscrap Friday #33
How Would This Not Violate The 10th Amendment? DallasNE Friday #35
It's a tantrum response to Thune telling him they don't have the votes to nuke the filibuster pat_k Yesterday #36
The Feds have no authority in elections Blumancru Yesterday #40
"Quiet! QUIET!! Piggy!!!" maxrandb 22 hrs ago #42
"I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, and... Ol Janx Spirit 18 hrs ago #44
MaddowBlog-Trump falsely claims that the U.S. is 'the only country that has mail-in ballots' LetMyPeopleVote 16 hrs ago #45
Voter ID bromeando 14 hrs ago #47

Bluetus

(2,518 posts)
31. Either way, we MUST educate the public and especially the MEDIA. That is not how EOs work.
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 09:50 PM
Friday

An Executive order cannot create or change law, and it cannot compel action that is contrary to law.

An EO is simply that, an order to EXECUTIVE BRANCH EMPLOYEES about how they should conduct their job. It has no weight on anybody or any entity that is not directly in the President's chain of command. It cannot direct corporations to do anything. It cannot direct states to do anything. It cannot direct individuals to do anything. And it cannot direct Exec Branch employees to do anything that is against the law or outside their legal authority.

So PLEASE, I beg everyone, if you make a post about one of Trump's bullshit EOs, please take an extra 30 seconds to explain what EOs are and what they are not.

Bluetus

(2,518 posts)
43. And I should have mentioned the big 2
Sat Feb 14, 2026, 11:58 AM
20 hrs ago

Above all else, an EO cannot direct any judge to do anything, and the EO cannot direct any legislator to do anything. That's called separation of powers.

quakerboy

(14,795 posts)
24. all laws or orders are as effective as the ability to enforce them
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 08:27 PM
Friday

And they have a highly funded, rapidly growing, personally loyal, legally unaccountable paramilitary force with no compunction against killing citizens for no reason.

Constitutions only work if they are upheld. Ours appears to be dead paper with a reputation rather than a relevant living doccument at this point.

Barring some change, this will get a lot uglier, probably soon.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,620 posts)
46. Yes. All the arguments in here about how its unconstitutional, so it won't happen, are naive.
Sat Feb 14, 2026, 03:49 PM
16 hrs ago

If the GOP congress doesn't lift a finger, and his brown shirts accept the call for duty on election day, who is going to stop them? We already know Trump will disregard judges orders. It could be timed so that any opposition motions are just delayed and appealed to a date beyond November.

Democrats must be pro-active. They very rarely are. They are too often a reactive party. They need to be proactive more, like the swift response by Newsom to null the gerrymandering in Texas.

Mount a fierce Get out the Vote campaign. Including paying for ID for those who can't afford it. And volunteer to give transportation. Surely there are more liberal millionaires even billionaires who would donate to a fund of this non partisan endeavour.

BlueKota

(5,166 posts)
28. What if the SC's six sycophants
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 08:58 PM
Friday

rule it's constitutional even though it's not? It wouldn't be the first time they ruled against actual Constitutional law, for their orange deity.

Justice matters.

(9,576 posts)
37. Right! If his sycophantic "aides" in legal matters didn't tell him
Sat Feb 14, 2026, 01:31 AM
Yesterday

it doesn't work like that, he would have made the EO already.

But like stated above, red states could take the bait and pass laws that require a photo ID to vote, but they are red states anyway.

OTOH, blue states will ignore his shenanigan, which will allow him to claim it was rigged.

bluestarone

(21,716 posts)
6. I know for sure, from all my friends here that what TSF is saying is
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 05:39 PM
Friday

BULLSHIT!! He has NO AUTHORITY to do any of this. My biggest concern is ICE and how THEY could destroy our midterm election. SCARY days ahead.

onenote

(46,077 posts)
7. "researched the depths of legal arguments not yet articulated or vetted."
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 05:48 PM
Friday

The chances Trump wrote that are approximately 0.0 percent.

msongs

(73,310 posts)
10. unfortunately voter ID is popular. just what kind is the sticking point. here in hawaii one has to provide ID to
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 06:12 PM
Friday

register, mostly for proof of residency. I dont recall having to show ID at the voting place. there is a huge vote by mail turnout here

BumRushDaShow

(167,490 posts)
14. Here in Philly
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 06:55 PM
Friday

we only need to show an ID if voting "in person" for the very first time and/or if changing voting division due to a move, and voting in that polling place for the first time. If requesting an absentee ballot (either "no excuse" or as a regular absentee), then some kind of ID verification is required (driver's license number or last 4 digits of SS#) to apply for a ballot.

After that when voting, no ID is needed and the voter still needed to sign-in before voting (I'm guessing with signature check as I stopped doing in person during the pandemic in 2020 and haven't done in person since). I know they updated to using the electronic poll books after I stopped in-person voting and I think that is how people now sign in (used to be big binders with pages of names and a line to sign).

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,237 posts)
11. In January, trump's March executive order on elections was struck down
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 06:19 PM
Friday

trump cannot change state election laws by executive order. The last election executive order was struck down. trump needs for congress to act which is NOT going to happen



https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/trump-there-will-be-voter-i-d-for-the-midterm-elections-whether-approved-by-congress-or-not/

In January, a federal court issued a permanent injunction against Trump’s March, 2025 executive order that attempted to require documentary proof of citizenship on voter registration and limitations on mail-in ballots. In her opinion, U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, articulated why the Founders entrusted administration of elections first with the states in the Constitution’s Election’s Clause.

“The Framers of our Constitution recognized that power over election rules could be abused, either to destroy the national government or to disempower the people from acting as a check on their elected representatives,” Kollar-Kotelly wrote. “Accordingly, they entrusted this power to the parts of our government that they believed would be most responsive to the will of the people: first to the States, and then, in some instances, to Congress.

The idea that immigrants are being brought into the United States to vote is a far-right conspiracy theory that has been repeatedly disproven. It is already illegal for noncitizens to vote, and those that do so intentionally are easily caught, prosecuted, imprisoned for years, and then deported, all for the chance to cast a single ballot out of hundreds of thousands. Consequently, noncitizen voting is exceptionally rare, as election officials and court findings across the country have persistently shown.

Similarly, mail-in ballots are popular across the country and have shown no evidence of being particularly susceptible to electoral fraud. The SAVE America Act would not limit mail-in ballots, but another bill recently introduced in the House, the Make Elections Great Again Act, would.

JohnnyRingo

(20,673 posts)
15. Just like it's the Gulf of America whether Congress wants it or not.
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 06:57 PM
Friday

I read a newspaper every day. No one uses that name, or Dept of War.

No mention of how he's going to enforce it in blue states.

LymphocyteLover

(9,608 posts)
49. I use Apple Maps for directions on my phone, of course Apple has been just as bad as Google in
Sun Feb 15, 2026, 07:42 AM
37 min ago

sucking up to the orange demon.

I use DuckDuckGo or Bing for searches.

JohnnyRingo

(20,673 posts)
41. Google has monopoly suits against them.
Sat Feb 14, 2026, 09:03 AM
23 hrs ago

Sure, they could grow a backbone and spit in his eye, but they might not like the consequences.
AP and Reuters have a 1st amendment shield around them, but Google is a business, and yes, they probably are close to a monopoly. They can temporarily appease him and continue to enjoy that advantage.

It's too bad when companies knuckle under for him, and it certainly frustrates that he can influence them, but he's the president that breaks things.

It seems like their cooperation is half hearted anyway. I searched Gulf of America:

[img][/img]

BaronChocula

(4,241 posts)
18. "...laying out the 'legal reasons' for national voter-identification requirements."
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 07:29 PM
Friday

So basically filing a brief no one will read. It's already in the FOANX News script.

3825-87867

(1,858 posts)
25. I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject,
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 08:28 PM
Friday

And if they've not been "articulated etc" then how could he have searched...blah, blah, blubber.

Mr.Bee

(1,728 posts)
26. Whatever Happened to STATES RIGHTS
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 08:31 PM
Friday
Is being in love with trump mean you have to give up Republicants demands about
States Rights over their elections and how they're handled??

States, Not the President, Run Elections in America

thought crime

(1,387 posts)
30. Prepare for disruption of mid-term elections.
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 09:49 PM
Friday

We need to have legal strategies to help prevent disruption, because they mean to do it.

DallasNE

(7,990 posts)
35. How Would This Not Violate The 10th Amendment?
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 10:34 PM
Friday

As well as the Articles in the Constitution assigning elections to the States? I presume Trump will claim emergency powers override the clear intent.

pat_k

(12,885 posts)
36. It's a tantrum response to Thune telling him they don't have the votes to nuke the filibuster
Sat Feb 14, 2026, 12:18 AM
Yesterday

I have no doubt that Trump has been trying to strongarm/bully Thune to whip his conference to vote to nuke the filibuster.

As I posted in another thread

Expect renewed demands from the felon to go nuclear to get SAVE passed

Fingers crossed that enough Republicans would vote against ending the filibuster, but I expect that ENORMOUS pressure will be put on Thune to whip his conference into nuking the filibuster.

The felon is hellbent on doing everything in his power to end free and fair elections in the United States. To that end, I have no doubt the regime will pull out all the stops in their efforts to get the new version of the SAVE act passed in the Senate.

We must not underestimate the regime's determination on this.

As long as our elections are capable of measuring the true will of the American people (even imperfectly), we can thwart their effort reshape the U.S. into the mold of other illiberal democracies.

They know this.


I suspect this EO will never actually materialize. It has the ring of other angry threats to do this or that "shortly" that have gone by the wayside. Of course, sycophants may come up with some bullshit EO to placate him, but if they do, I would be SHOCKED if it weren't universally rejected by the courts -- including SCOTUS.

Blumancru

(239 posts)
40. The Feds have no authority in elections
Sat Feb 14, 2026, 06:47 AM
Yesterday

It falls to the individual states. The states that will honor this Executive Order are states that vote red anyway. I don’t think this will have much effect.
Interesting and a little off subject that there is nothing in the constitution requiring a popular vote for president. The states can choose the electors any way they want to. The legislature can appoint them or whatever.

Ol Janx Spirit

(855 posts)
44. "I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, and...
Sat Feb 14, 2026, 01:42 PM
18 hrs ago

...will be presenting an irrefutable one in the very near future" has got to be the least-believable most-hilarious thing I have ever heard from a Turnip social media post....



I don't know who wrote that, but they deserve a Comedy Central award of some kind. Pure comic gold.

And I appreciate the hardy laugh it elicited in these dark times.

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,237 posts)
45. MaddowBlog-Trump falsely claims that the U.S. is 'the only country that has mail-in ballots'
Sat Feb 14, 2026, 03:41 PM
16 hrs ago

The president might be surprised to learn just how many longtime democracies with advanced economies rely on postal balloting without incident.

Trump falsely claims that the U.S. is ‘the only country that has mail-in ballots’
The president might be surprised to learn just how many longtime democracies with advanced economies rely on postal balloting without incident.

Donna898 (@donna-f898.bsky.social) 2026-02-13T21:18:49.709Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-falsely-claims-that-the-u-s-is-the-only-country-that-has-mail-in-ballots

For many years, millions of American voters have cast ballots through the mail without incident. Secure systems were created in red states and blue states alike; the public found the practice convenient; the process has long featured reliable safeguards; and even the most ardent election conspiracy theorists struggled to uncover any meaningful evidence of fraud or irregularities.

Donald Trump has nevertheless convinced himself that postal balloting is a national scourge that needs to be dramatically curtailed.

Trump: "We're the only country in the world that has mail in ballots"

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-02-12T19:09:59.328Z


....So, a few things.

First, I have no idea how Trump came to believe that voting by way of the mail is inherently corrupt. It’s not, and he has never offered anything resembling evidence to the contrary. He just keeps asserting the falsehood, apparently hoping that nonsense will become true by way of repetition.

If the president ever uncovers anything to bolster his claim, he’s welcome to present his findings to the public. In the meantime, however, his assertions are impossible to believe.

Second, the idea that no other country allows its citizens to vote through the mail is ridiculously untrue. Around the world, many countries, including longtime democracies with advanced economies, rely on postal balloting without incident.

30 countries use mail voting

Ari Berman (@ariberman.bsky.social) 2026-02-12T21:21:07.509Z


Third, Republican Party officials, at both the state level and national level, have practically begged Trump to stop lying about this because they want the GOP base to take advantage of mail-in voting. The more the president pushes these false claims, the more his followers believe him, which in turn creates problem for Republicans.

Finally, the American mainstream appears to have already made up its mind: A Pew Research Center poll last summer found that a 58% majority of Americans favor allowing any voter to cast their ballot by mail if they want to.

I have been working on voter protection for a long time. After the SCOTUS gutted the voting rights act and Texas adopted voter id, the Democratic Party started encouraging Democratic voters to use voter id. Back in 2010, the GOP had three times the number of ballots cast by mailed compared to Democrats. Vote by mail used to be a major element of the GOP GOTV efforts. I remember getting vote by mail applications from GOP groups

trump is hurting a major element of the GOP GOTV plans.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump says he will issue ...