Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(65,718 posts)
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 01:09 PM Wednesday

Exclusive: US considered charging Minnesota judges, lawyers in immigration crackdown, sources say

Source: Reuters

Exclusive: US considered charging Minnesota judges, lawyers in immigration crackdown, sources say

By Sarah N. Lynch
July 16, 20256:32 AM EDT Updated 3 hours ago

Summary
* FBI eyed judges, defense lawyers over virtual hearings for defendants in country illegally, sources say
* Status of early-stage probe into judges, defense lawyers remains unclear
* Virtual hearings common post-COVID, seen as routine by defense attorneys

WASHINGTON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department explored bringing criminal charges against Minnesota judges and defense lawyers who discussed requesting virtual court hearings to protect defendants from being arrested by federal immigration officers, according to five people familiar with the matter.

In February, FBI agents in Minneapolis opened a preliminary inquiry into whether local judges and defense attorneys obstructed immigration enforcement by requesting virtual hearings, and the concept was also pitched to law enforcement officials in Minneapolis and Washington, D.C., said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal Justice Department deliberations.

{snip}

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-considered-charging-minnesota-judges-lawyers-immigration-crackdown-sources-2025-07-16/



Reposted by ‘Homeland Heritage’ Hat
https://bsky.app/profile/kenwhite.bsky.social

>>>>>>
AblativMeatshld
‪@ablativmeatshld.bsky.social‬

Follow
I want the names of every motherfucker that spoke in favor of charges.

‪Reuters Legal‬
‪@legal.reuters.com‬
· 6h
The U.S. Justice Department explored bringing criminal charges against Minnesota judges and defense lawyers who discussed requesting virtual court hearings to protect defendants from being arrested by federal immigration officers, according to five people familiar with the matter.

Exclusive: US considered charging Minnesota judges, lawyers in immigration crackdown, sources say
The U.S. Justice Department explored bringing criminal charges against Minnesota judges and defense lawyers who discussed requesting virtual court hearings to protect defendants from being arrested by federal immigration officers, according to five people familiar with the matter.
reut.rs
July 16, 2025 at 11:20 AM
>>>>>>

I want the names of every motherfucker that spoke in favor of charges.

AblativMeatshld (@ablativmeatshld.bsky.social) 2025-07-16T15:20:53.808Z
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Exclusive: US considered charging Minnesota judges, lawyers in immigration crackdown, sources say (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Wednesday OP
Reaching...... Lovie777 Wednesday #1
I'm surprised that Reuters bungled the Headline Title. The United States is not going after a State , the DOJ is. msfiddlestix Wednesday #2
I am trying to remember... OldBaldy1701E Wednesday #3
Voting rights, waaaay back in the '60s? NT mahatmakanejeeves Wednesday #4

msfiddlestix

(8,114 posts)
2. I'm surprised that Reuters bungled the Headline Title. The United States is not going after a State , the DOJ is.
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 02:26 PM
Wednesday

is distinction with a difference in meaning and context. Reuters knows better, but I guess their copy editors aren't quite up to the job.

OldBaldy1701E

(8,427 posts)
3. I am trying to remember...
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 03:59 PM
Wednesday

And, I may be spitballing here, but I just cannot remember a time in the last administration when any federal governmental entity 'went after' specific states that just so happen to have defied their attempts to ignore the Constitution as well as the states ability to govern its own citizens.

I Just don't recall Joe Biden's DOJ or FBI ever appearing on camera and saying that they were going to sue Georgia because everyone was not rich therefore the state had failed to provide for their welfare.

Do any of you?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Exclusive: US considered ...