DOGE expected to take aim at DHS with staffing cuts, including at US Secret Service
Source: CNN Politics
Updated 10:34 PM EDT, Sat April 5, 2025
CNN Elon Musks Department of Government Efficiency is expected to take aim at the Department of Homeland Security in the coming days, seeking potentially major cuts to personnel across its agencies, including the US Secret Service, multiple sources tell CNN.
DHS is bracing for what could amount to significant layoffs, four sources familiar with the matter who were granted anonymity to speak freely told CNN, though no final decisions have been made, and the ultimate scale and scope has not been set. This week, two of the sources said, there was back-and-forth negotiation and lobbying between DOGE, the White House, and Homeland Security leadership, with each of the departments components expected to be impacted differently.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA, is expected to be decimated, one of the sources said. Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement are also facing potential cuts, two of the sources said. A senior DHS official told CNN the department is determined to eliminate government waste that has been happening for decades at the expense of the American taxpayer.
Across DHS, we will be eliminating non-mission critical positions and bureaucratic hurdles that undermine our mission to secure the homeland. Secretary Noem is determined to return DHS to its core mission of keeping America safe. CNN has reached out to DHS and DOGE for comment. The Secret Service declined to comment.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/05/politics/doge-dhs-secret-service/index.html

Javaman
(63,531 posts)her hourly wardrobe changes and her daily flights to nowhere will have to be put on hold.
Irish_Dem
(67,547 posts)And the expensive video teams who follow her everywhere?
Katinfl
(337 posts)The manpower it takes to protect him on the golf course is ridiculous.
LiberalArkie
(17,859 posts)I am sure that Miller and others would be ok without receiving any pay.
NH Ethylene
(31,082 posts)Rebl2
(16,075 posts)start by getting rid of trumps secret service agents and then cut the vice presidents secret service. Then cut secret service agents for trumps family as well as Vances family.
kimbutgar
(24,746 posts)They already cut services for President Bidens family!
tishaLA
(14,594 posts)And probably Jenna and Barbara Bush. "I am your retribution" and all that. What an asshole.
BumRushDaShow
(150,337 posts)Malia would have been older than 16 (she was 19) when their dad's term was up so would have probably not had any protection. Sasha was 15, IIRC, so would have had it until she turned 16 about 5 months later.
BumRushDaShow
(150,337 posts)It updated previous versions that had suddenly restricted Secret Service protection to 10 years post-Presidency and returned it to "life time" (including the spouse), but drops it for any children (post-Presidency) once they hit age 16.
H.R.6620 - Former Presidents Protection Act of 2012
112th Congress
An Act
To amend title 18, United States Code, to eliminate certain limitations
on the length of Secret Service Protection for former Presidents and for
the children of former Presidents.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Former Presidents Protection Act of
2012''.
SEC. 2. ELIMINATING CERTAIN LIMITATIONS ON THE LENGTH OF SECRET
SERVICE PROTECTION FOR FORMER PRESIDENTS AND
FOR THE CHILDREN OF FORMER PRESIDENTS.
(a) Former Presidents.--Section 3056(a)(3) of title 18, United
States Code, is amended by striking ``unless the former President did
not'' and all that follows through ``warrant such protection''.
(b) Children of Former Presidents.--Section 3056(a)(4) of title 18,
United States Code, is amended by striking ``for a period'' and all that
follows through ``comes first''.
Approved January 10, 2013.
kimbutgar
(24,746 posts)Their protection. Whos going to stop him?
BumRushDaShow
(150,337 posts)"they are breaking laws left and right".
And if he did it, it would go to court and would be stayed.
How it will get enforced will be determined by how the SCOTUS handles the first-up case they have of his violative "birthright" E.O., and what happens after that.
Martin68
(25,345 posts)BobTheSubgenius
(11,953 posts)Why does he need any?
joanbarnes
(1,981 posts)cstanleytech
(27,510 posts)One where if they have the money that they can damn well stop being a deadbeat like Trump.
ToxMarz
(2,336 posts)until someone gets 'sorta shot in the ear'.
BumRushDaShow
(150,337 posts)"Grazed" was more like it.