The Axe Rises Over Medicare and Medicaid
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: Talking Points Memo
April 3, 2025 6:00 p.m.
Earlier this week I noted the fact that the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services had been oddly immune thus far to the DOGE axe, not just compared to other HHS divisions and agencies but across almost the entire federal government. This seemed in large part because of the role Brad Smith, a key DOGEr who worked at CMS during Trumps first term, and because of nominal DOGE chief Amy Gleason who worked in high level roles at Smiths companies. I noted that relative immunity because there were signs that might soon change. It has now changed.
On March 31st, CMS COO Amy Brandt sent out instructions for major cuts that had to take place across CMS. As she explained, HHS had been assigned a total amount of savings from canceled contracts. And of that total amount CMS was responsible for just over $2.7 billion.
That amounted to 35% of CMSs average total spend on contracts from the years FY2023 and 2024. So in technical terms, a shit-ton of money and a huge percentage of the overall budget.
As career CMS people have explained to me, CMSs work is almost entirely contracted out. So this isnt a case where you have most stuff done in house and some subset of the work is contracted out. Its almost entirely contracted out. I further learned that the IT component is responsible for at least $750 million of that. The request came down on March 31st with responses due on April 3rd, i.e., today. So four days to decide how to cut more than a quarter of the CMS budget.
Read more: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-axe-rises-over-medicare-and-medicaid
As I have posted before - over 1/2 of the federal government IS "contracted out" to private industry. They think they are only slashing civil service employees but every cancelled contract is destroying some PRIVATE business.

(from here - https://www.brookings.edu/articles/is-government-too-big-reflections-on-the-size-and-composition-of-todays-federal-government/)

bucolic_frolic
(49,630 posts)They like the pain and deprivation angle. Couldn't they just pass cost prohibitive increases to Part B and D?
Wouldn't it be cheaper to force everyone into a million dollar life insurance contract at age 50? Something we could sell off to pay the bills at age 70?
BumRushDaShow
(150,337 posts)They created a fictional world of "the deep state", concocting and internalizing some bullshit about all these "civil servants" that need to be eliminated.
Little did they realize was that the guy they threw under the bus - Ronald Zombie Raygun - started that whole "contracting out" crap in the '80s and it has been going full throttle ever since - notably eliminating much of the administrative functioning, and then contracting out the "customer service" function, the IT function, and most recently, the "investigation" function (e.g., IRS, FBI, etc).
The actual number of civil service employees has remained pretty static - somewhere in the 2 million range - for the past 40 years - DESPITE an increase in the U.S. population from ~235 million in 1984 to ~340 million in 2024.
Deminpenn
(16,704 posts)already is outsourced.
BumRushDaShow
(150,337 posts)They are so brainwashed that they think that "contracts" are just "money going to civil servants".
I mean we're talking companies like Oracle, Booz-Allen-Hamilton, Deloitte (who I saw got slashed and burned), Hewlett-Packard, Cisco, etc.
eppur_se_muova
(38,761 posts)gab13by13
(27,509 posts)Democrats should have taken a stand and not passed the CR.
Hopefully the Timid 10 are working on Plan B.
Omaha Steve
(105,072 posts)DUPE of https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143432971
Plus a lot of analysis.