Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(150,339 posts)
Tue Feb 25, 2025, 05:09 AM Feb 25

Judicial branch employees - which Trump does not oversee - got Musk's email asking for their accomplishments

Source: The Independent

Monday 24 February 2025 21:14 GMT


Elon Musk’s mandated email demanding federal employees detail what they accomplished last week was sent to some judiciary staff even though the executive branch has no authority over them.

After the billionaire said that failure to respond “will be taken as a resignation,” which he has since walked back following uproar, it has emerged that some judges were among those who received the email from the Office of Personnel Management.

Spokespeople from federal courts in Manhattan, Texas and Illinois have told media outlets that some judiciary employees received the email Saturday but their staff were advised to ignore it.

Julie Hodek, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois spokesperson, told NBC News that the court's chief judge and clerk “communicated with the staff that as we are judiciary employees, our policies and procedures are governed by the Judicial Conference of the United States and our local court HR handbooks.”

Read more: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/elon-musk-email-judiciary-b2703867.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judicial branch employees - which Trump does not oversee - got Musk's email asking for their accomplishments (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Feb 25 OP
Something to study in this case would be "who got them" and then "why them, specifically"? AZJonnie Feb 25 #1
They should reply with their intended accomplishments - Eloon in prison, stripped of his wealth. Wonder Why Feb 25 #2
THIS NotHardly Feb 25 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author milestogo Feb 25 #3

AZJonnie

(651 posts)
1. Something to study in this case would be "who got them" and then "why them, specifically"?
Tue Feb 25, 2025, 05:22 AM
Feb 25

Could be the people that got them were those who'd previously worked for executive branch, in which case still lame but explainable. OTOH, could be 'people who've donated to ActBlue, ever' in which case of course it becomes very alarming.

Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judicial branch employees...