Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(144,802 posts)
Sun Jan 5, 2025, 07:45 PM Sunday

Klobuchar knows of no Democrats objecting to certifying Trump's win

Source: Axios

9 hours ago


Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) said she does not "know of" any Democrats who plan to object to the certification of President-elect Trump's election victory Monday.

Why it matters: Not only will the day stir up memories of the 2020 election certification, but it will also see Vice President Kamala Harris certify her loss to a man she repeatedly characterized as a threat to American democracy.

  • She joins a small club of other vice presidents throughout history who have had to oversee the affirmation of their loss through their role as the president of the Senate.
  • Harris and the newly sworn-in Senate will operate under the updated Electoral Count Act, which makes objections harder to raise and safeguards them from delaying the certification process without sufficient congressional support.


  • Driving the news: Klobuchar said Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that while she knows of no Democrats who plan to object to Trump's win, "the process allows for these objections."

  • But she pointed to the Electoral Count Act, which raised the threshold for support of an objection to 20% of each congressional body. Previously, it took only one member of each chamber to challenge a state's electors.
  • "That's [prolonged debate over objections] what was used as a trigger ... last January 6th, to slow down the process, and then, of course, ultimately seen by the insurrectionists as a way they could derail the will of the American people," Klobuchar told Jake Tapper.

  • Over 140 Republicans objected to Biden's 2020 win.


  • Read more: https://www.axios.com/2025/01/05/klobuchar-no-dems-object-trumps-win
    16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
    Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

    bucolic_frolic

    (47,800 posts)
    1. 140
    Sun Jan 5, 2025, 07:52 PM
    Sunday

    We can't object as election deniers. It's not our theory, and not supported at all.

    14A Sec 3 is the best opportunity but was emasculated by GOP 6R SCOTUS.

    You need a theory, belief, facts to hang your hat. J6 Committee reported it and all the world saw it with their own eyes.

    Not good enough.

    ColinC

    (11,048 posts)
    3. The constitution is clear
    Sun Jan 5, 2025, 08:04 PM
    Sunday
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    Whether congress fulfills their duty in upholding the constitution is an entirely different matter. This isn't about who won the election, it's about whether the supreme law of the land allows the winner to hold office. It clearly says he cannot.

    kelly1mm

    (5,434 posts)
    8. I don't think congress will even discuss the subject and thanks to the electoral certification changes
    Sun Jan 5, 2025, 11:08 PM
    Sunday

    made after Jan 6, 2020, challenges of any kind will be MUCH harder.

    If President Trump were miraculously disqualified by the congress the VP Vance would be sworn in anyway. Out of the frying pan and into the fire ......

    ColinC

    (11,048 posts)
    9. Wrong. If Trump is not certified, Harris becomes president. Read the article by the SCOTUS clerks.
    Sun Jan 5, 2025, 11:31 PM
    Sunday
    https://thehill.com/opinion/congress-blog/5055171-constitution-insurrection-trump-disqualification/

    To make an objection under the Count Act requires a petition signed by 20 percent of the members of each House. If the objection is sustained by majority vote in each house, the vote is not counted and the number of votes required to be elected is reduced by the number of disqualified votes. If all votes for Trump were not counted, Kamala Harris would be elected president.

    Marthe48

    (19,495 posts)
    2. Because even if the U.S. Constitution is drunk on its ass
    Sun Jan 5, 2025, 08:02 PM
    Sunday

    because rwnj spiked its drink, the Dems will support the insanity and hope the Constitution snaps the hell out of it.

    MFM008

    (20,011 posts)
    4. This democrat
    Sun Jan 5, 2025, 08:18 PM
    Sunday

    Objects. Strongly. And as long as the Democratic party keeps bending over like the billionaires the Republicans are going to continue to take advantage.

    J_William_Ryan

    (2,294 posts)
    5. "no Democrats objecting to certifying Trump's win"
    Sun Jan 5, 2025, 08:29 PM
    Sunday

    That’s because Democrats are champions of democracy and respect the will of the people – no matter how wrong the people are.

    nuxvomica

    (13,050 posts)
    11. But not constitutional democracy apparently
    Mon Jan 6, 2025, 03:11 AM
    Yesterday

    There's no way you can slice this as anything but a denial of the Constitution.

    Polybius

    (18,586 posts)
    16. Not necessarily
    Tue Jan 7, 2025, 12:55 AM
    20 hrs ago

    It now takes 20% in the House (dumb new law we passed), rather than just one. It did not get the 20% obviously, but if some members objected, it was private.

    Firestorm49

    (4,240 posts)
    12. "No Democrats objecting"? Sounds typical of our dont fight back" mentality.
    Mon Jan 6, 2025, 11:09 AM
    Yesterday

    A convicted felon is about to take us down the road to ruin and we still feel the need be polite? Then I guess we have it coming. Sorry.

    According to the illusion of section three of the14th Amendment - oh, sorry - the “concept” of section three, as a convicted felon, what’s his name should never have been allowed to hold office ever again. We had years to confront the situation with earnest, but chose to be polite and let them rub it in our face. We deserve what we are about to get, or lose, depending on your point of view.

    The time to fight is over. We watched it happen. We will now watch on the sidelines as we sink into a fascist state. As acting VP, Harris should at the very least try to rub some shit in their faces before she departs, but that would be impolite. Sometimes I feel like a British soldier during the Revolutionary war.

    We had our chance to stand up for our Constitution and blew it. What’s coming up next will be ugly.



    Bengus81

    (7,543 posts)
    14. Watched it happen watching Garland for years and saying WHEN boy WHEN??
    Mon Jan 6, 2025, 11:42 AM
    Yesterday

    Biggest pussy in Government AND a Republican.

    Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Klobuchar knows of no Dem...