Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(144,733 posts)
Sat Jan 4, 2025, 04:36 AM Saturday

'Do something!' Rep. Stacey Plaskett furious as she's told she can't vote for speaker

Source: Raw Story

January 3, 2025 4:39PM ET


A congresswoman from the Virgin Islands rose in the House during the speakership vote on Mike Johnson (R-LA) to protest the more than a century-long refusal of the House to give a vote on the floor to elected officials from U.S. territories.

"I note that the names of representatives from American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and the District of Columbia were not called, representing, collectively, 4 million Americans," said Stacey Plaskett to broad applause from the Democratic side of the chamber. "Mr. Speaker, collectively, the largest per capita of veterans in this country."

"Does the gentlelady have a problem?" the presiding member asked. "I asked why they were not called," said Plaskett. "I asked why they were not called from the parliamentarian, please." "Delegates-elect and the resident commissioner-elect are not qualified to vote," came the response. "Representatives-elect are the only individuals qualified to vote in the election of the speaker. As provided in Section 36 of the House rules and manual, the speaker is elected by a majority of the members-elect voting by surname."

"Thank you, Mr. Speaker," said Plaskett. "This body and this nation has a territory and a colonies problem. What was supposed to be temporary has now, effectively, become permanent. We must do something about this."

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/stacey-plaskett-2670736563/?utm_source=superhead



Saw that live. The GOP side was pissed at her righteous rant (despite the fact that I believe that all of the Delegates except the one from the VI (Plaskett) and from D.C. (Eleanor Holmes Norton) are Republicans (P.R., Guam, Am. Samoa, Mariana Islands))!
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Do something!' Rep. Stacey Plaskett furious as she's told she can't vote for speaker (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Saturday OP
"I have a voice!" - Del. Stacey Plaskett (D-VI) - C-SPAN Rhiannon12866 Saturday #1
Thanks for adding the clip! BumRushDaShow Saturday #2
Don't know whether she would have accepted, Just Jerome Saturday #3
That would have been wonderful. Bluethroughu Saturday #7
incredible show of strength cadoman Saturday #4
They are territories - but not occupied territories FBaggins Saturday #5
Taxation without representation? 70sEraVet Saturday #6
Only partly. Igel Saturday #9
Yes they pay taxes which use our 1040 the payments go to their own locations IbogaProject Saturday #13
Gonna be a tough sell madville Saturday #12
Part's that she must not know the Constitution. Igel Saturday #8
"Or she just wanted to make a point" BumRushDaShow Saturday #10
Just absorb them into existing states madville Saturday #11

Rhiannon12866

(224,999 posts)
1. "I have a voice!" - Del. Stacey Plaskett (D-VI) - C-SPAN
Sat Jan 4, 2025, 05:14 AM
Saturday


Del. Stacey Plaskett (D-VI) makes a parliamentary inquiry as to why delegates from U.S. territories and the District of Columbia are not allowed to vote for Speaker of the House. - Aired on 01/03/2025.


BumRushDaShow

(144,733 posts)
2. Thanks for adding the clip!
Sat Jan 4, 2025, 06:45 AM
Saturday

The irony is that a bunch of Delegates who are impacted just like her, were sitting over on the GOP side apparently silent.

cadoman

(990 posts)
4. incredible show of strength
Sat Jan 4, 2025, 07:43 AM
Saturday

If these are not states, then what are they? Occupied territories? Let them participate in our democracy or go free.

FBaggins

(27,826 posts)
5. They are territories - but not occupied territories
Sat Jan 4, 2025, 08:47 AM
Saturday

Most of them were originally Spanish colonies and were acquired from Spain in years following the Spanish/American War.

The US has had nonvoting territorial representation since the beginning (including during the founding period).

70sEraVet

(4,265 posts)
6. Taxation without representation?
Sat Jan 4, 2025, 10:41 AM
Saturday

They have representatives, but no voice.
She's right -- we DO have a territory and colonies problem.

Igel

(36,331 posts)
9. Only partly.
Sat Jan 4, 2025, 02:47 PM
Saturday
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxation_in_Puerto_Rico

Unless you derive earned income from the US government, no federal income taxes. You pay payroll taxes but you also get social security and medicaid/medicare benefits. Wiki notes that they pay more in federal income taxes than 6 states (the source for that is 2020, so that's probably for year 2018, maybe 2019) but not that PR currently has more than 3x the population of all but one of those states. (Don't know the stats for 2018/19 for population.)

Still, they do have a voice, just not a vote. However, they could apply to become states (with some kind of adjustment; we think it's unjust for a Wyoming resident to have a great impact per vote than somebody from California; giving the VI and WY each just 1 representative would be expected, but the VI has 1/12th the population of WY.)

IbogaProject

(3,862 posts)
13. Yes they pay taxes which use our 1040 the payments go to their own locations
Sat Jan 4, 2025, 05:50 PM
Saturday

I guess federal employees or any mainland income get taxed by the IRS.

madville

(7,495 posts)
12. Gonna be a tough sell
Sat Jan 4, 2025, 04:56 PM
Saturday

To convince their constituents they need to start paying federal income tax on income derived inside the territory in order to get a vote in the House.

Igel

(36,331 posts)
8. Part's that she must not know the Constitution.
Sat Jan 4, 2025, 02:36 PM
Saturday

Or she just wanted to make a point, does know but wants the usual procedure for being made a state ignored. PR has voted and the referendum has failed--lack of turnout or statehood was voted down.



As it is, I assume that if all 5 territories were made states a lot of people would have serious issues with them each having 1 Representative and 2 Senators. It would make the disproportionate representation by population number by states like Colorado seem downright great.

We could lump them all together or maybe unite Samoa, Marianas and Guam with HI, PR and the VI with, I don't know, FL or make them their own state. But our democracy has a process and they can follow it. (They could also just vote for independence and get rid of their affiliation with the structurally racist patriarchal US entirely.)

BumRushDaShow

(144,733 posts)
10. "Or she just wanted to make a point"
Sat Jan 4, 2025, 03:30 PM
Saturday

She knows.

Remember that Eleanor Holmes Norton (in addition to demanding D.C. statehood) had made this subject one of her defining battles.



Norton is now 87 and as the only other Democrat (IIRC) among the Delegates (having represented D.C. for almost 35 years), has probably begun to "pass the torch" on to Plaskett, who has been the perfect firebrand to carry on the tradition.

madville

(7,495 posts)
11. Just absorb them into existing states
Sat Jan 4, 2025, 04:46 PM
Saturday

The Caribbean islands become part of Florida, Hawaii gets the Pacific ones and D.C. can become part of Maryland and/or Virginia. Problem solved.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Do something!' Rep. Stac...