Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(52,947 posts)
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 03:27 PM Thursday

Net Neutrality Rules Struck Down by Appeals Court

Source: NYT

A federal appeals court struck down the Federal Communications Commission’s landmark net neutrality rules on Thursday, ending a nearly two-decade effort to regulate broadband internet providers like utilities.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, in Cincinnati, said that the F.C.C. lacked the authority to reinstate rules that prevented broadband providers from slowing or blocking access to internet content. The decision put an end to the Biden administration’s hallmark tech policy, which had drawn impassioned support from consumer groups and tech giants like Google and fierce protests by telecommunications giants like Comcast and AT&T.

-snip-

The F.C.C. had voted in April to restore net neutrality regulations, which expand government oversight of broadband providers and aim to protect consumer access to the internet, a move that will reignite a long-running battle over the open internet.

The regulations were first put in place nearly a decade ago under the Obama administration and are aimed at preventing internet service providers like Verizon or Comcast from blocking or degrading the delivery of services from competitors like Netflix and YouTube. The rules were repealed under President Donald J. Trump, and they have proved to be a contentious partisan issue over the years while pitting tech giants against broadband providers.

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/02/technology/net-neutrality-rules-fcc.html

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Net Neutrality Rules Struck Down by Appeals Court (Original Post) highplainsdem Thursday OP
Everything tsf does is to hurt the working class/poor and help the olgarchs - the total asshole that he is! lark Thursday #1
So, online vs TV, and TV won? lindysalsagal Thursday #2
the rich have got their channels in the bedrooms of the poor - L. Cohen msongs Thursday #3
Wait... GB_RN Thursday #4
Nailed it. orangecrush Thursday #7
No. Igel Thursday #9
Think You Misunderstood Me. GB_RN Thursday #10
outcome Snoopy 7 Friday #12
just saw this Snoopy 7 Friday #13
I wonder if Sammy and Clarance are gonna like watching a pixilated inauguration.... 3Hotdogs Thursday #5
Kiss free speech goodbye orangecrush Thursday #6
We haven't had net neutrality for over four years Jose Garcia Friday #14
All money and power flows to our oligarch overlords. Here's a shit sandwich for the plebes... jvill Thursday #8
*An Announcement From Your ISP* LudwigPastorius Thursday #11

lark

(24,377 posts)
1. Everything tsf does is to hurt the working class/poor and help the olgarchs - the total asshole that he is!
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 03:39 PM
Thursday

I could not hate any person more than I do him!!!

lindysalsagal

(22,451 posts)
2. So, online vs TV, and TV won?
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 03:47 PM
Thursday

I worry about what else this could mean, like, allowing so much disinformation to appear to be reliable.

GB_RN

(3,245 posts)
4. Wait...
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 04:42 PM
Thursday

Let me get this straight. Because these rules were ditched by Cantaloupe Caligula the Corpulent’s FCC chair, Ajit “Idgit” Pai, the FCC doesn’t have the power to reinstate those same rules? The very same rules that the agency implemented over 10 years ago?

What. The….?

Igel

(36,331 posts)
9. No.
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 06:25 PM
Thursday

From the OP:

In its opinion, a three-judge panel pointed to a Supreme Court decision in June, known as Loper Bright, that overturned a 1984 legal precedent that gave deference to government agencies on regulations.

“Applying Loper Bright means we can end the F.C.C.’s vacillations,” the court ruled.


Nothing to do with Trump's FCC. His FCC was a side comment. They could have equally well said "discussions" or "decision-making in this regard."

GB_RN

(3,245 posts)
10. Think You Misunderstood Me.
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 08:08 PM
Thursday

I was adding in the history of the rules for context, not claiming that Caligula’s FCC had any direct impact here. To reiterate: Obama’s FCC initiated the rules. Cantaloupe Caligula’s FCC killed the rules, and Biden’s tried to bring them back. Then, this court said the FCC can’t deal with their own rules. That’s what I find astounding. Stupidly so.

Snoopy 7

(597 posts)
12. outcome
Fri Jan 3, 2025, 07:00 AM
Friday

By overturning Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo the SC was saying that only they make the rules. They overturned a law that said the FCC doesn't have the power to regulate the rules that were passes. The supreme court wants all the power and all the agentcies are not to think they can do what ever is right without the SC telling you what is right. It doesn't matter that the SC will overturn what ever their owners want, they are the last word. This SC doesn't believe in the separations of power in the Government. The SC wants to be the judge, jury and executioner/Judiciary, Legislative & Executive..

3Hotdogs

(13,631 posts)
5. I wonder if Sammy and Clarance are gonna like watching a pixilated inauguration....
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 05:46 PM
Thursday

or Lawrence Welk reruns in slow motion.

LudwigPastorius

(11,179 posts)
11. *An Announcement From Your ISP*
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 09:46 PM
Thursday

Your current Political Opinions Package™ subscription is expiring. To continue receiving DemocraticUnderground.com and all of the other political websites you enjoy, please submit your credit card and select the $9.99 per month, or &114.99 per year, option.

Thank you.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Net Neutrality Rules Stru...