Net Neutrality Rules Struck Down by Appeals Court
Source: NYT
A federal appeals court struck down the Federal Communications Commissions landmark net neutrality rules on Thursday, ending a nearly two-decade effort to regulate broadband internet providers like utilities.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, in Cincinnati, said that the F.C.C. lacked the authority to reinstate rules that prevented broadband providers from slowing or blocking access to internet content. The decision put an end to the Biden administrations hallmark tech policy, which had drawn impassioned support from consumer groups and tech giants like Google and fierce protests by telecommunications giants like Comcast and AT&T.
-snip-
The F.C.C. had voted in April to restore net neutrality regulations, which expand government oversight of broadband providers and aim to protect consumer access to the internet, a move that will reignite a long-running battle over the open internet.
The regulations were first put in place nearly a decade ago under the Obama administration and are aimed at preventing internet service providers like Verizon or Comcast from blocking or degrading the delivery of services from competitors like Netflix and YouTube. The rules were repealed under President Donald J. Trump, and they have proved to be a contentious partisan issue over the years while pitting tech giants against broadband providers.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/02/technology/net-neutrality-rules-fcc.html
lark
(24,377 posts)I could not hate any person more than I do him!!!
lindysalsagal
(22,451 posts)I worry about what else this could mean, like, allowing so much disinformation to appear to be reliable.
msongs
(70,310 posts)GB_RN
(3,245 posts)Let me get this straight. Because these rules were ditched by Cantaloupe Caligula the Corpulents FCC chair, Ajit Idgit Pai, the FCC doesnt have the power to reinstate those same rules? The very same rules that the agency implemented over 10 years ago?
What. The
.?
orangecrush
(22,159 posts)From the OP:
In its opinion, a three-judge panel pointed to a Supreme Court decision in June, known as Loper Bright, that overturned a 1984 legal precedent that gave deference to government agencies on regulations.
Applying Loper Bright means we can end the F.C.C.s vacillations, the court ruled.
Nothing to do with Trump's FCC. His FCC was a side comment. They could have equally well said "discussions" or "decision-making in this regard."
GB_RN
(3,245 posts)I was adding in the history of the rules for context, not claiming that Caligulas FCC had any direct impact here. To reiterate: Obamas FCC initiated the rules. Cantaloupe Caligulas FCC killed the rules, and Bidens tried to bring them back. Then, this court said the FCC cant deal with their own rules. Thats what I find astounding. Stupidly so.
By overturning Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo the SC was saying that only they make the rules. They overturned a law that said the FCC doesn't have the power to regulate the rules that were passes. The supreme court wants all the power and all the agentcies are not to think they can do what ever is right without the SC telling you what is right. It doesn't matter that the SC will overturn what ever their owners want, they are the last word. This SC doesn't believe in the separations of power in the Government. The SC wants to be the judge, jury and executioner/Judiciary, Legislative & Executive..
Snoopy 7
(597 posts)Here is proof that they want all the power: https://democraticunderground.com/10143366091
3Hotdogs
(13,631 posts)or Lawrence Welk reruns in slow motion.
orangecrush
(22,159 posts)Expect much more of this type of HORSESHIT.
Jose Garcia
(2,943 posts)The sky never fell.
jvill
(435 posts)LudwigPastorius
(11,179 posts)Your current Political Opinions Package subscription is expiring. To continue receiving DemocraticUnderground.com and all of the other political websites you enjoy, please submit your credit card and select the $9.99 per month, or &114.99 per year, option.
Thank you.