Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Was the commander-in-chief clause intended to allow the president to use the military
as props in a self-aggrandizing commercial venture, as we recently saw?
| 0 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
| Oh, obviously. What other purpose could it have? | |
0 (0%) |
|
| Dunno. On the one hand. On the other hand. Mebbe | |
0 (0%) |
|
| I don't think so ... | |
0 (0%) |
|
| 0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
| Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
|
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
