Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amaryllis

(11,515 posts)
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 07:59 PM 4 hrs ago

The Question Inside Trump's White House Wasn't If They Could Suspend Rights--It Was If They Could Get Away With it

https://joycevance.substack.com/p/the-question-inside-trumps-white

Joyce Vance
Jun 15, 2026

The headline read “Frustrated by Courts, Trump Weighed Suspending a Constitutional Right.” It teased the story like this: “Secret memos show that the White House debated last year, to a greater degree than previously known, whether to limit habeas corpus rights for undocumented immigrants.”

What follows is an outrageous attempt, even though it ultimately failed, at least for now, to shatter firmly established constitutional rights and protections. In sharing this story, The New York Times’ Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan are giving us a peek at their forthcoming book. Leaving aside, for the moment, the inevitable debate over whether journalists have an obligation to report in real time as opposed to holding their most interesting revelations for later publication, their reporting in this story puts together some previously known or suspected information with new details to provide detailed support for understanding this administration as a threat to democratic ideals.

On April 29, 20205, A confidential memo written by White House staff secretary Will Scharf, who is a lawyer, warned Trump chief of staff Susie Wiles that a plan to suspend habeas corpus for unauthorized immigrants was in the works. Haberman and Swan write that it was “careful and lawyerly but amounted to a warning against end-running the rule of law.”

Habeas corpus is the legal right to challenge government-imposed confinement. The Latin phrase roughly translates to “you shall have the body,” and the legal doctrine brings people to court to require the government to justify why an individual is in custody—regardless of citizenship status. In other words, it’s the basic check that prevents government from locking people up indefinitely without sufficient reason. It’s a foundational protection against “disappearing people”. Habeas is the heart of due process.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Question Inside Trump's White House Wasn't If They Could Suspend Rights--It Was If They Could Get Away With it (Original Post) Amaryllis 4 hrs ago OP
Morals Out The Window VBNMW_Realist 4 hrs ago #1
It will be a bloodbath. Fiendish Thingy 4 hrs ago #3
Which is why they didn't do it Fiendish Thingy 4 hrs ago #2
Who's Running The Show (?) wyn borkins 4 hrs ago #4
Voight and Miller Amaryllis 4 hrs ago #5
No Doubt About It... wyn borkins 3 hrs ago #6

VBNMW_Realist

(6 posts)
1. Morals Out The Window
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 08:04 PM
4 hrs ago

From the standpoint of Donald Trump and most of the Republican Party, morals don't mean anything (unless it comes to their favorite bible verses). And the law doesn't mean anything either if they don't get punished for breaking it. I have said this since 2016 and it is even more true now: the only reason that Trump has not been even worse is that the courts will not allow him. When he tried to overturn the 2020 election, he was serious about it even though he knew he had lost. He is a fraudster.

As we saw in this effort to suspend habeas corpus, and some other cases, the legal system along with the US constitution is one of the only things standing in the way of Trump being able to become a dictator, and then appoint a younger crony like JD Vance or someone else who has acted in lockstep with him recently.

The midterms need to be a bloodbath for Republicans to show we will not tolerate wannabe dictators.

Fiendish Thingy

(24,351 posts)
2. Which is why they didn't do it
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 08:12 PM
4 hrs ago

The lawyers knew they would be disbarred, and the rest knew that anyone held without habeas would be ordered immediately released by the courts, laying the groundwork for a colossal constitutional crisis, one that could be the catalyst for an impeachment and removal.

Reminder:

Trump is not omnipotent, and the states and the people are not powerless

Something keeps this administration from enacting the full blown dystopian nightmare scenarios everyone fears- what is it?

My guess is self-preservation.

wyn borkins

(1,507 posts)
6. No Doubt About It...
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 08:41 PM
3 hrs ago

...and may they soon spend time together in an 8x8 window-less concrete jail cell...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Question Inside Trump...