San Francisco immigration court shuts down after purge of judges, leaving asylum cases in chaos

[Zorro]

There are no immigrants waiting for rulings anymore at San Francisco’s main immigration court, no lawyers making arguments.

The court, which had 21 judges when President Donald Trump was sworn in last year, had only two left when it closed May 1. The rest had been fired, retired or resigned amid a White House purge of federal immigration judges.

The closing is one more reflection of the turmoil that has upended the immigration court system as the administration looks for ways to churn through its massive backlog of 3.8 million asylum cases and deport as many people as possible.

Asylum denial rates have soared as the administration has fired almost 100 judges seen as too liberal, and approved using hundreds of military lawyers to replace them. Immigrants have been arrested when they arrive at courthouses or government offices for scheduled appearances.

But amid the nationwide upheaval, San Francisco is the first major city to be left without a primary immigration court, leaving chaos and dysfunction in a region long known for its friendliness to asylum seekers. The two remaining judges will work from another federal building in the city but will be part of an immigration court across the bay.

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2026/05/22/immigration-court-turmoil/?share=hn0ogwcm6iii2soig2o2

[Igel]

1. Sorry. Teach physics. And judge clearance 'looks like' volume flow rate.

So the # of judges '86ed' increased. But I've read about more hired, and that seems absent. Must state, for full AP points, that no judges were hired. Otherwise, a valid option is ignored.

That's just how it work. "90% turnover!" "But all workers were replaced after training" suddenly makes that initial claim less important. How important? Per Chomsky, "that's an empirical question." In other words, "who knows, but let's write a grant proposal!"