Rep. Neguse resolution to overturn Citizens United

[IcyPeas]

YES. YES. YES.

My resolution to overturn the Supreme Court’s disastrous Citizens United decision — H.J.Res 122 — has now been co-sponsored by 72 Members of Congress. You can view the full list at: www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c....

I’ll keep fighting to get it across the finish line!

— Rep. Joe Neguse (@neguse.house.gov) 2026-03-20T13:30:44.816Z

[Drum]

1. Behind this effort 100 percent!

[lastlib]

2. Me TOO!

This should be the litmus test for ALL candidates at EVERY level, for EVERY office!

[lastlib]

3. small point:

Joe Neguse is a Representative, not a Senator.

[IcyPeas]

4. Oops. Fixed. Thanks

[Tasmanian Devil]

6. Give him time ....

He's my rep and I can't wait until he's Senator Neguse.

[madamesilverspurs]

14. He's not my rep, BUT

He makes it a point to spend lots of time in CD8, knowing that Gabe Evans is worse than useless. We are always delighted to have him here.

.

[niyad]

20. And I am stuck with crank, who is worse than his predecessor, lumpy lamborn.

[ABC123Easy]

5. OMG

Only 72?????
Only 72?????

OMG, how are our representatives NOT in favor of this?

WTF???

[AZ8theist]

18. They're more loyal to the almighty dollar than to the country

[GiqueCee]

7. You GO, Congressman!

Tear 'em a new one!

[LilElf70]

8. This MUST be done

The crooked money needs to stop.

[peppertree]

9. Hear, hear

Sadly - there isn't a single GOPee congresscritter who wouldn't rather feed their wives to a lion, than allow this bill to pass.

(heck - many of them don't even need that)

[Cheezoholic]

10. Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! And Yes!!!!!!!!!!!! This is a winner IF we can get people to understand what it is, so important!!

When I can chew on someone's ear long enough to explain exactly what it is they usually get that "WTF?" look on their face. Left, right or independent, when it's explained to them they no want it AT ALL! No, no and a hell no. Seriously I can't believe how many of the left leaning/center/independent people I know really don't understand what it is. Right wingers have 0 clue to the point one guy told me he thought it was Bush 1's "Thousand Points of Light" shit made into law (yeah I know. He's a helluva cabinet maker but .... lol). We should pound this into the affordability message like crazy. Once you get some people to understand it it tends to make them see these "tax cuts" completely differently (don't ask me why).

YES YES YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


FF!!!

[colorado_ufo]

11. We need to find a way to explain these things with humor - general, not "pointed" humor at an individual's politics.

A way for a person not familiar with the issue to see its absurdity and make them realize that this is something that was never in their favor or self-interest. A way to make an issue "stick" so that more people will grasp it and rise up against it. This is the work of political cartoons, reducing an issue to a simple, visual message; we need to devise verbal "cartoons."

[IcyPeas]

25. Agree. It's one of those terms that doesn't sound like what it is.

Citizens United.... sounds great right? Let's unite as citizens.

Needs a new name that makes it clear what it is.

We have new voters coming of age every year and I wouldn't blame them for not knowing what this is. They may be aware that there's too much money in politics but don't know it didn't use to be like this.

Terms like "Super Pacs" and "Citizens United"

I just looked at the Wikipedia entry for CU and it says:

The Citizens United ruling was highly controversial and remains a subject of widespread public discussion

...widespread public discussion??? It is? Where? I guess I'm not seeing this.

[ShazamIam]

12. We need this to save us from billionaires like Musk, Ellison, etc.

[electric_blue68]

13. THIS! TY, Rep and co-sponsores!

[Seinan Sensei]

15. Shine a light in dark places

Or at the very least, require all lawmakers to wear one of those NASCAR-style jumpsuits, with patches of sponsors and donors sewn everywhere

[byronius]

16. Right on.

[badhair77]

17. This has to happen.

We need to fight for this. Best news I heard today, that an effort even exists.

[Augiedog]

19. Add it to the $200 billion Iran bill you have to authorize

[AllaN01Bear]

21. ding, this !!!!!!!!!

[niyad]

22. This bill was introduced last September, apparently.

[IcyPeas]

24. Correct. See this link (this is the link in Neguse's post)

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-joint-resolution/122/cosponsors

[niyad]

33. Yes, I saw it.

[Wednesdays]

23. Sounds great, but guess who will strike it down as being "unconstitutional"

The only thing that will be bulletproof is a constitutional amendment, and that's a very big hill to climb.

[reACTIONary]

27. I think you are right. How can a "resolution" overturn...

... a supreme court decision, especially one rooted in the first amendment?

[reACTIONary]

28. OK, Here is the answer....

.... "H.J.Res.122 - Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States..."

Not. A. Chance.

[lastlib]

29. Mt. Everest was once a very big hill to climb.....

(and still is.....), but hundreds go for it every year. We can do it IF we work hard enough for it!

[thesquanderer]

31. This is a proposal for a constitutional amendment. And it is indeed a very big hill to climb. n/t

[wendyb-NC]

26. Yes

It has to go. It's aim is to let the wealthy to buy the Government Leasdership that will work for them

[reACTIONary]

30. So, what exactly his resolution? It is H.J.Res.122 - Proposing.....

..... H.J.Res.122 - Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

There is no chance of this going anywhere.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-joint-resolution/122/text

[jfz9580m]

32. Overturning Citizens United would be a big deal

Wouldn’t it?
I remember reading about it on DU back in the day:

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained

[evemac]

34. Neguse is my rep!!

I really like him. 👍

[leftstreet]

35. DURec

[OGBuzz]

36. Not a single republican.

I'm shocked, shocked I tell ya.