General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat Is the U.S. Navy Telling Trump?
Trump isn't sending ships to the Strait of Hormuz. Why is that, do you suppose?
Well, I don't have any actual names or times, but here's probably the reason:
Naval expert have told Trump that there is no viable way that US Navy ships can safeguard shipping vessels through that bottleneck. Worse, it would be very difficult to even defend the Naval vessels themselves. Since we have no control over the land bases at the Strait, Iran could easily attack any warships we send in there, and with almost zero warning.
Bottom line: "Don't try it, Mr. President! It will fail miserably."
So, Trump calls for other nations to do it. But they aren't about to do something so stupid. Not a freaking chance.
Trump is stuck and has no valid way to get unstuck from this situation. "Stupid is as stupid does," once again.
ms liberty
(11,192 posts)Everyone else could see from miles away just exactly how disastrous this would be. Only a malignant narcissist with dementia and a staff of evil nazis would fall for this.
MadameButterfly
(4,010 posts)Hitler thought he was a military genius, didn't listen to advice, got upset if anyone criticized him. He made major decisions by intuition and feeling because no one could be superior to him in strategy.
There was no end to his ambition. Conveniently, loss of life didn't bother him.
EYESORE 9001
(29,668 posts)but his guts had shit-for-brains.
returnee
(910 posts)Nice turn of a phrase!
modrepub
(4,078 posts)That other guy actually participated in a shooting war and at least initially scored major successes on the battlefield. Our current administration has been racking up loses almost from day 1. And while Venezia cant be categorized as an abject failure it certainly didnt pose a formidable opponent compared to what that mid 20th century despot faced early on.
some_of_us_are_sane
(3,085 posts)Wounded Bear
(64,221 posts)with our other obligations around the world. I know trump doesn't really care about all that but still, resources are finite.
Wounded Bear
(64,221 posts)with our other obligations around the world. I know trump doesn't really care about all that but still, resources are finite.
efhmc
(16,569 posts)Maybe two of them are working at any given time.
MadameButterfly
(4,010 posts)and people in the military are concerned with how fast Trump is going through supplies.
Trump has never understood budgeting of any kind. The concept that resources are finite doesn't compute. He keeps saying that our supplies of munitions is unlimited.
I've never been for stockpiling military weapons but he could in the end, before he learns this lesson, leave us rather exposed. Not to mention Ukraine.
Meanwhile Ukraine is providing anti-drone technology to the US to protect US bases in the region. I wish I believed Ukraine would get something in return.
popsdenver
(2,197 posts)all oil sanctions on Russia...........Ukraine should be instead, using those drones on Russian Pipelines, Refineries, and oil tankers....
MadameButterfly
(4,010 posts)which I find amazing--how they have created an industry like that under their conditions. Ukraine's supply has to be limited and donating to us while we are committing war crimes seems a gamble. i heard that their drones are much cheaper than the weapons we were using to protect the bases. I don't want our bases destroyed--at least the soldiers in them--but the worse it is for Trump the sooner we get rid of him.
A normal president would appreciate tUkraine's help and notice that they are acting like an ally while Russia isn't. But that won't happen with Trump.
efhmc
(16,569 posts)MineralMan
(151,135 posts)Last edited Mon Mar 16, 2026, 05:28 PM - Edit history (1)
Trump made an oath after finishing the military school he was sent to by his father: "If I get out of here, I swear I will never read another book in my lifetime!"
He kept that oath, even though he has failed to keep others.
efhmc
(16,569 posts)MadameButterfly
(4,010 posts)Hard to tell these days.
MineralMan
(151,135 posts)So...
MadameButterfly
(4,010 posts)i get your point, but without saying so some might think it's an actual quote.
MineralMan
(151,135 posts)GopherGal
(2,883 posts)All such non-toady humans have long since disappeared from the Maladministration. I suspect some sort of narcissism weapon has been secretly deployed which repels any non-toadies and has to be turned off for certain diplomatic visits so that someone like Zelenskyy can get within 100 feet of him.
efhmc
(16,569 posts)MadameButterfly
(4,010 posts)So anyone not already in that state is in danger. I mean, people who choose to work there. I think Zelensky would manage to escape.
leftstreet
(40,316 posts)That would be newsworthy
MineralMan
(151,135 posts)They know how to evade Trump's orders. They are that much smarter than he is that he doesn't even notice.
leftstreet
(40,316 posts)German defense minister Pistorius this morning:
"What does Trump expect a handful of European frigates to do that the powerful US navy cannot?"
MineralMan
(151,135 posts)Rebl2
(17,651 posts)broke it and only they can fix it. So I am guessing this is going to drag on a while.
underpants
(196,204 posts)When hes not in the room? Jesus Ming Christ WE ing TOLD him and that stupid frat boy about this but NOOOOOO what do we know? Theyll just give up they said.
Swede
(39,253 posts)With lots of mentions of TRUMP.
Nittersing
(8,332 posts)I suspect it is very close to the truth.
funny/not funny
calimary
(89,845 posts)A chimp with a small dick who wants to compensate with a lot of big scary-looking guns.
With apologies to real chimpanzees wherever they may be.
spanone
(141,421 posts)maxsolomon
(38,588 posts)Which Repuke congressperson would vote to Impeach?
Roc2020
(1,776 posts)Last edited Mon Mar 16, 2026, 01:09 PM - Edit history (1)
scenarios to escape are horrific. Walk away-Israel is left alone to fight. Put soldiers on Iran's soil, Iran waiting for that for decades to kill american troops, Nuke Iran, Israel gets nuked. Trapped.
MineralMan
(151,135 posts)Other nations aren't so stupid, though.
Roc2020
(1,776 posts)calimary
(89,845 posts)Happy Hoosier
(9,522 posts)Detecting and countering small naval drones is in its infancy. Most of our defences are oriented towards airborne threats.
As Ukraine has proven, it's virtually certain that a determined naval drone user will sneak one through now and again.
MiHale
(12,944 posts)Then theyll forget about Iran, high prices, terrorist attacks, oh yeah almost forgot EPSTEIN, EPSTEIN, EPSTEIN.
A sarcastic bent
GusBob
(8,237 posts)Is the Navy requesting that?
Are they trying to flood the zone with decoys and targets?
Is he trying to draw other countries into the conflict by getting one of their ships destroyed and sailors killed?
Does he think he can build a coalition?
Coming soon: he will claim anti-semitism because they wont help Israel
MineralMan
(151,135 posts)Cleverly, all of the European countries are saying "NO WAY!"
And he can't order anyone to join him in his stupidity.
republianmushroom
(22,268 posts)Raven123
(7,768 posts)We didnt scale up, so we have drawn down our resources.
Trump would love for someone else to try to clean up this mess so he can withdraw our military and blame that someone else for failure as this disintegrates.
Its Covid all over again (remember the speech in which he said it would be all over by Easter). Completely miscalculated.
BattleRow
(2,339 posts)lostnfound
(17,492 posts)1) nukes
2) complete and sudden withdrawal of US from Mideast
Sane presidents would do neither. But he remains stuck in his terrible two, with the worlds most fearsome arsenal at his disposal.
MineralMan
(151,135 posts)You forgot that one.
gab13by13
(32,091 posts)2 of them are in Asia right now.
Red Mountain
(2,330 posts)dang it.
AND we retired another 4 minesweepers based in the gulf in January......what terrible luck.
Probably just as well. There seem to be some questions about how effective the new minesweepers are at their jobs.
Scubamatt
(302 posts)when confronted with failure . . . Declare Victory, and command his media to replicate that message far and wide, announcing that in all the history of victories, there had never been a more victorious victory. The people will lap it up, and he will move on to the next distraction/disaster.
ffr
(23,371 posts)LymphocyteLover
(9,760 posts)dalton99a
(93,910 posts)The answer was straightforward: Even one Iranian soldier or militia member zipping across the narrow neck of the strait in a speedboat could fire a mobile missile right into a slow-moving supertanker, or plant a limpet mine on its hull.
With oil already hovering around $100 a barrel, and insurance premiums for transiting the Persian Gulf surging, the image of more burning tankers would make the Iranians look more powerful than they really are. Already, having seen Iran attack shipping around the strait, tanker owners are refusing to take the risk, even after Mr. Trump declared on Fox last Sunday that they should show some guts.
The strait was Exhibit A in Irans ability to seize an asymmetric advantage. Despite ramped-up strikes in recent days against what little is left of the Iranian Navy, traffic through the strait has come to a near halt. A New York Times analysis concluded that as of Thursday, at least 16 oil tankers, cargo ships and other commercial vessels had been attacked in the Persian Gulf, including three in the narrowest part of the strait.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/15/us/politics/trump-stark-choices-iran-war.html
BidenRocks
(3,186 posts)That's incredible!
jmowreader
(53,132 posts)They use magnets to stick to ships' hulls below the waterline. The Iranians are huge fans of them.
They have probably already been set to the hulls of the ships that are trapped there. Just waiting for the signal to activate them.
LilElf70
(1,543 posts)when you go into an unprovoked, illegal, no reason to attack, war. To make matters worse, there was absolutely no plan for after his initial hits.
gfarber
(267 posts)There once was a Donald named Trump,
Who faced quite a maritime slump.
Advisers all said,
Send ships there and youre dead
That strait would make warships go thump.
He asked, Can our Navy defend
Those tankers from end unto end?
The experts replied,
With Iran on each side,
Your ships would be targets, my friend.
With land bases not in our grip,
Theyd strike any escorting ship.
No warning would sound,
Just missiles inbound
Best not start that dangerous trip.
So Trump said, Perhaps allies could try
Send fleets through that narrow pass by.
But nations all thought,
That plans overwrought
Not us, wed much rather not die.
And so in a puzzling morass,
Hes stuck like a mule in the grass.
The lesson, some say,
Still echoes today:
Stupid does what stupid has.
Disclaimer: Yes, an AI helped write thisbecause if youre looking for pure, hand-crafted literary suffering, youre welcome to go produce some yourself. If you like my attempts, consider clicking the link.
https://buymeacoffee.com/gfarber
calimary
(89,845 posts)It just gets better and better!
Xolodno
(7,345 posts)I believe he's genuinely pissed from his first term when he was told "you can't do _insert whatever_" He is now doing what he wants and believes in his warped brain we are capable of doing anything. So who cares what they say, optics, strategy, logistics, etc. be damned.
SusieCreamcheese
(46 posts)The Felon's foreign policy is based upon his own irritable bowel movements.
Justice matters.
(9,725 posts)Pesky gas prices suddenly get on his gut...
Escurumbele
(4,079 posts)They all knew this was going to be a disaster, why is the military obeying orders they know they should not?
This is so disappointing and scary at the same time, when the military gives in to a buffoon like trump you know things will get very, very bad for the entire country, that is how dictators get in power, the military becomes complicit, and in my opinion, that is what we are seeing today.
MineralMan
(151,135 posts)time refusing a Presidential order. Both literally and traditionally, they cannot do so. They can resign, but they cannot refuse.
It is a conflict that has never been really tested. So far, I believe Trump is listening to their reasons, but how long that will last I do not know.
Cha
(318,678 posts)Nations.
Sounds reasonable .. TY
OC375
(820 posts)Navy wants a mission to aggressively bring the fight to the enemy, and deny him initiative. That's what they do. They are excellent at it and have the means to do it. A single carrier fleet unchained can change the dynamics of the area for a generation or more. It's truly horrific.
Doing nothing, no objective, or ROE's that involve wearing blinders and taking crap isn't what Navy excels at. I'd imagine they are pretty steamed at showing up to a gig, only to find no immediate plan other than "Hold my beer while I tell everyone you'll kick their asses."
Trump is a tease, which is almost as bad to many of them as putting them in harms way for personal gain.
H2O Man
(78,970 posts)I've seen someone saying the "plan" involved taking control of Kharg island, when the battle ship coming from South Korea arrives. No, it's not ..... exactly for the reasons you outline. More, an amphibious landing would have to start out from Saudi Arabia's eastern coast, which is far enough away that it creates as high a risk as if they actually landed.
More, while the destruction escalates, both sides have been careful not to seriously damage the oil plants. The Saudis don't want that. The president is looking for an off-ramp, and it is not possible to say how all of this horror plays out. I think he will bluff about sending in troops, but hopefully not do so. Yet he did not learn the first lesson from our generation's war in Vietnam: one can win every battle, and still lose the war. Other culture's actions are not limited by our concepts of space and time, though this president surely is.
My fear -- and I'm interested in your and other opinions -- is that as Israel takes more damage as a direct result of Netanyahu's madness, will he resort to a nuke?
MineralMan
(151,135 posts)Trump says much, but does little, really. He has, no doubt, been warned about the risks of some of those actions. So, he talks a good battle, but doesn't really want one. Not really. It's one thing to stand off from the coast and attack targets. It's quite another to commit to putting ground troops at risk and with it a risk of high casualty numbers.
I am counting on Trump to cave on this, declare victory, and pull out. He'll leave the rest to Israel.
BarbD
(1,410 posts)Last edited Mon Mar 16, 2026, 04:56 PM - Edit history (1)
Now we are stuck with the incompetent, stupid actions of idiots.
Reminds me of Tennyson's poem --"The Charge of the Light Brigade"...... Into the valley of Death rode the six hundred........."
gulliver
(13,935 posts)I'm a firm believer in not helping the enemy, even by brain fart speculation. I want us to win and get out. I'm perfectly willing to have Trump or anyone else running things saying whatever they think works: true, false, outrageous, juvenile, etc. Even if we thought the media were capable of anything resembling true transparency, we should still be against it. That should be obvious.
Most of the government folks and actual retired military expert commentators on CNN seem to be appropriately careful about how much they're willing to "explain" to the audience. But it's still pretty appalling when you see some (usually questionably informed) dummy opining that the IRGC, for example, seems to be "in charge." The lowlife Islamic Regime undoubtedly has access to CNN. Hopefully they get no comfort from it.
Emile
(42,042 posts)Iran has a submarine fleet consisting of approximately 28 to 30 vessels, including Kilo-class, Fateh-class, and Ghadir-class submarines.
MineralMan
(151,135 posts)Iran's military assets. I would not underestimate that intelligence, though.
EX500rider
(12,516 posts)Emile
(42,042 posts)Iran's submarines are primarily based at the Bandar Abbas naval base, located in the Strait of Hormuz. They operate in various waters, including the Persian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Sea, and the Caspian Sea.
EX500rider
(12,516 posts)Emile
(42,042 posts)in the area.
EX500rider
(12,516 posts)They can hardly get deep enough not to be seen from the air for one.
And what depth to set depth charges for and anti-sub torpedos to search at becomes a lot easier.
Old Crank
(6,938 posts)Who said that Trump has no good way out of this message. The best might be declare a win and just leave tail between his legs. Other options are worse. And worse would be dragging this mess into the summer months before the elections.
I've seen where the heads of the British military and German military have both said essentially the same thing. Not our job or NATOs job to fix what you broke.
tintinvotes
(143 posts)Iran has agreed to let countries other than USA and Isreal thru the strait if they pay a toll, it's already happening. Brilliant plan by Iran to get paid.
red dog 1
(32,961 posts)And shared on Bluesky.