Kimball Musk (Elon's brother) and Jeffrey were having a romantic/emotional relationship and is also named as an abuser.
Now there was a headline I did not have on my 2026 Bingo Card. All of the TrumpStein Elite were involved.
https://deanblundell.substack.com/?utm_source=navbar&utm_medium=web
= new reply since forum marked as read
The more layers you peel back, the more it stinks and the more likely you are to cry as a result. So many things I wish I never knew. 
From the point of view that Epstein played matchmaker for musk's brother and a woman. It works despite some clumsy language.
Edit to add link:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/10/jeffrey-epstein-tesla-kimbal-musk
Epstein engineered intimate relationship for Tesla’s Kimbal Musk, emails show
Jeffrey Epstein engineered an intimate relationship between a woman in his network and Kimbal Musk, who is the brother of Elon Musk and on the board of directors at Tesla, according to emails from the Department of Justice’s recent release of documents involving the convicted sex offender. The younger Musk and the woman were involved for around six months between 2012 and 2013, with Kimbal Musk describing them as “dating”.
In the lead-up to Musk and the woman’s first meeting, Epstein and his longtime associate Boris Nikolic labored to set them up and bring her to a birthday party Musk was throwing – with Nikolic telling Epstein: “please prepare [the woman] —
”
“Jeffrey and Boris, many thanks for connecting me with [the woman],” Musk later emailed Epstein and Nikolic in October 2012 after a lunch at Epstein’s Manhattan apartment. “I believe you both played a role. 
”
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA02006981.pdf
Yeah, Epstein and this musk bro were not — if this correspondence is the “proof” — having an affair!!
I had seen that but now it makes sense. 
I’ve been researching the files like a maniac, and when I see a screenshot or reference to a file, I immediately go check the actual files to see if what I’ve read is 100% on the money, and in this case, NOPE! It’s just bad form to post something on the web that is a twist or variation of the truth, eh? The waters are muddy enough already!!
Also, I just learned in the last couple of days that you can search for a string of words/phrase and find the source, yay! To find this Kimbal link I searched for “would you be up for going back a step to just dating” and voila, went right to the link!
(Just passing along!)
A whole sentence between quote marks can be really precise.
Interestingly, yesterday I read that there is a particular woman - a publicist I think, who exchanged a few emails with epstein and thousands of people associated with her ended up 'in' the epstein files - for no logical reason except they dealt with this woman.
Dammit, should have kept the link! But it just goes to show that being 'in' the epstein files does not necessarily make someone a participant in the trafficking.
And I sure hope innocent people remain untouched by this disgusting display of foul people wrecking lives by the thousands with their sick cruelty -
