I can say this much for the Trump administration's version of DEI/affirmative action:
The women he hired and appointed are just as vicious, incompetent, arrogant, smug, stupid and useless as the men (not to mention lip-filled, botoxed, hair-extended and cleavaged in order to display the obligatory Mar-A-Lago Look). I give you Bondi, Gabbard, Leavitt, Noem, Halligan, Habba, and "advisor" Loomer, to name a few. I'm sure there are others, and for sheer awfulness they give his heinous collection of men a run for their money.
= new reply since forum marked as read
I had to adopt it... it's too accurate! 
The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias that describes the systematic tendency of people with low ability in a specific area to give overly positive assessments of this ability. It was first described by the psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999. In popular culture, the Dunning–Kruger effect is sometimes misunderstood as claiming that people with low intelligence are generally overconfident, instead of describing the specific overconfidence of people unskilled at particular areas.
The Dunning–Kruger effect has been demonstrated across multiple studies in a wide range of tasks from fields such as business, politics, medicine, driving, aviation, spatial memory, examinations in school, and literacy. The original study by Dunning and Kruger focused on logical reasoning, grammar, and social skills. The effect is usually measured by comparing self-assessment with objective performance. For example, participants may take a quiz and estimate their performance afterward, and their estimates are then compared to their actual results.
A number of explanations for, and criticisms of, the Dunning–Kruger effect have been proposed. The metacognitive explanation holds that poor performers misjudge their abilities because they lack the ability to recognize the qualitative difference between their performances and the performances of others. The statistical explanation holds that the empirical effect may largely be the result of a mere statistical effect and the fact that people have a general tendency to think that one is better than average. The rational explanation holds that overly positive prior beliefs about one's skills are the source of false self-assessment. Another explanation claims that self-assessment is more difficult and error-prone for low performers because many of them have very similar skill levels.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
