General Discussion

applegrove

(127,075 posts) Tue Jul 22, 2025, 03:49 AM Jul 22

Oh my!

— George Conway ðŸ‘ŠðŸ‡ºðŸ‡¸ðŸ”¥ (@gtconway.bsky.social) 2025-07-22T05:13:16.446Z

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Oh my! (Original Post) applegrove Jul 22 OP

AFAIK a vote in the House doesn't mean shit AZJonnie Jul 22 #1

And they keep talking about the Grand Jury file which Scrivener7 Jul 22 #2

And maga will feel rolled and used even more than they do now. Even maga can't be fooled all the time. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 22 #5

It keeps the Epstein issue alive. In the media. Makes people call their Reps. Disrupts maga & RCons. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 22 #4

And that's a vey very good thing. They've got a proverbial monkey on THEIR back for once Cheezoholic Jul 22 #7

They normally need 218 signatures to discharge BumRushDaShow Jul 22 #3

My goodness, is Marge itching to join the Nasty Woman club? tanyev Jul 22 #6

AZJonnie

(1,100 posts)

1. AFAIK a vote in the House doesn't mean shit

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Tue Jul 22, 2025, 04:14 AM

Jul 22

The House has no authority to make any judges unseal files, and while they have 'oversight' over DoJ, I can't remember the last time the House forced DoJ to release anything they didn't want to, they just make up some bullshit for why can't/don't have to, and that's that. Dems had both Houses AND POTUS from 2021-2022, and we still haven't see the unredacted Mueller report, for example. And the House doesn't have any info on this subject of its own to 'release', cause they've never even investigated Epstein

This is a dog and pony show by MTG, she's trying to carve out a 'maverick' status (which was also bullshit when the word was bandied about with McCain ... at least until Trump came along and legit pissed him off personally). She's been told she's allowed to do this, but only because no vote is going to come, and even if it did, it sure shit wouldn't be to release anything. Trump has told them to move along, and that's what they're doing. What they're told.

Scrivener7

(56,536 posts)

2. And they keep talking about the Grand Jury file which

Reply to AZJonnie (Reply #1)

Tue Jul 22, 2025, 06:09 AM

Jul 22

will have nothing in it about the rest of the perverts other than Epstein.

Bernardo de La Paz

(57,261 posts)

5. And maga will feel rolled and used even more than they do now. Even maga can't be fooled all the time. . . nt

Reply to Scrivener7 (Reply #2)

Tue Jul 22, 2025, 08:10 AM

Jul 22

Bernardo de La Paz

(57,261 posts)

4. It keeps the Epstein issue alive. In the media. Makes people call their Reps. Disrupts maga & RCons. . . . nt

Reply to AZJonnie (Reply #1)

Tue Jul 22, 2025, 08:09 AM

Jul 22

Cheezoholic

(3,143 posts)

7. And that's a vey very good thing. They've got a proverbial monkey on THEIR back for once

Reply to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #4)

Tue Jul 22, 2025, 08:42 AM

Jul 22

And even though it's BS as long as it has their base twisted in a knot, we should use it for all its worth

BumRushDaShow

(157,267 posts)

3. They normally need 218 signatures to discharge

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Tue Jul 22, 2025, 06:37 AM

Jul 22

but since there are 4 vacancies and assuming this means they can still discharge on a simple majority, they would need 4 (R)s (and all (D)s)) to do it.

tanyev

(47,265 posts)

6. My goodness, is Marge itching to join the Nasty Woman club?

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Tue Jul 22, 2025, 08:16 AM

Jul 22

Reply to this discussion