General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm sorry but I have a couple of pet peeve triggers that keep going off.
1. To call Israel-Iran situation a conflict is making me want to vomit. Two countries are firing missiles at each other. They used to call that WAR.
2. For ten years and counting now, the MSM has described Russias assaults on elections around the world as meddling. Interfering with another countries elections used to be considered and act of WAR.
I'm sorry, but WTF?

SheltieLover
(71,407 posts)Breathe...deeply.
We can resist & protest, but we cannot control the media lies or the ruskie assets in govt.
Precisely why I've not watched any tv in over 10 yrs. I detest liars.
JMCKUSICK
(3,117 posts)And in most ways, I'm better off for it.
SheltieLover
(71,407 posts)
unblock
(55,377 posts)They had no problem calling Al gore a liar for one deliberately misinterpreted statement, but they *still* wince at even saying Donnie "has a problem with the truth" when he's literally the most thoroughly documented liar in history.
And they've long since stopped bothering even mentioning the grift of charging secret service random prices to stay at his residence because hey it's a hotel, so grifting is ok I guess.
ananda
(32,566 posts)Thanks
yellow dahlia
(2,607 posts)usonian
(18,990 posts)A conflict opens loopholes for having a war without actually getting congress to declare one.
Korea? Vietnam? Iraq? Afghanistan? The list goes on.
Here's the "rationale"
https://govfacts.org/explainer/declaration-of-war-vs-authorization-for-use-of-military-force-how-america-goes-to-war
Regardless, he doesn't give a shit for laws.
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-doomsday-plane-spotted-flying-2087848
Readying the E4B for the doomsday scenario
(so much nicer than a bunker, don't you think?)
and/or the flight to Moscow.
WHAT TO KNOW
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=20415032
The E-4B "Nightwatch,"dubbed the "Doomsday Plane" is a militarized Boeing 747. It serves as the National Airborne Operations Center and is a key component of the National Military Command System for the president, the secretary of defense and the joint chiefs of staff.
In a national emergency or loss of ground command, the aircraft "provides a highly survivable command, control and communications center to direct U.S. forces, execute emergency war orders, and coordinate actions by civil authorities," the U.S. Air Force said.
It was used during the September 11, 2001 attacks.
----
Wonder if it has enough fuel to make it to Moscow?
With all those trumpcoins safely in a crypto wallet?
Oh, those tankers .....
I predicted a complete internet and infrastructure outage.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220295160
That sucker seems right on plan and on schedule.
До свидания
WAIT! "coordinate actions by civil authorities"
That's no damn good at all.
Bev54
(12,647 posts)Complete hipocracy, complaining that Iran has hit a hospital where citizens, including babies are located. He goes on to say it is a war crime. JFC look in a mirror, I guess he just confessed he has committed war crimes.
question everything
(50,616 posts)civilians can hide.
returnee
(600 posts)but its still a war crime.
MorbidButterflyTat
(3,307 posts)How many crimes has the fugly felon publicly confessed to? And - crickets.
BidenRocks
(1,836 posts)The media are letting Democrat party go through as if it isn't an error.
Just fuck you!
Nictuku
(4,280 posts)The Free Press is Complicit.
Elected Officials are Complicit.
Trump Voters or Non-Voters are Complicit.
Nothing is Normal Anymore.
Karasu
(1,590 posts)Karasu
(1,590 posts)fascists. All opinions are equally valid, don't you know--no matter how uninformed.
It's infuriating.
3Hotdogs
(14,348 posts)targeting civilians.
Like I've posted before, what is genocide, depends on who is doing the genodeciding.
Wiz Imp
(5,968 posts)TomSlick
(12,584 posts)To avoid the question whether there is a "war" for purposes of the application of the Geneva Conventions, etc., international law does not talk about the "laws of war." Instead, the reference is to the "laws of international armed conflict" and "laws of non-international armed conflict."
The change is in the 1977 Protocol I (international armed conflict) and Protocol II (non-international armed conflict) to the Geneva Convention. The US signed Protocols I and II but never ratified them. The consensus of US international law experts is that by signing the Protocols, the US agreed to move toward ratification and, therefore, agreed to be bound by them. Israel, Turkey, and India have not signed the Protocols.
A good argument is made that since the Protocols have been adopted almost all countries, it is binding on all countries, whether or not signed or ratified.
stopdiggin
(14,013 posts)With the idea that regional (and perhaps intermittent?) conflict, while messy, horrible and degrading, is much preferable to WWIII - and people going nuclear ?
Or so the thinking goes.
Vinca
(52,361 posts)Response to JMCKUSICK (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed