She Won, Part II: Seven Judges. Direct-to-Cell Satellites. A Hijacked Election.

[Botany]

Last edited Thu Jun 19, 2025, 10:24 AM - Edit history (1)

How the Federalist Society’s judicial pipeline and a new network of 265 low-Earth orbit DTC satellites (Musk’s*)cleared the runway for Trump’s return to power.

We’ve already broken down the digital and satellite infrastructure. Now, we’re stepping inside the courtrooms—and following the judges—who strategically removed all accountability hurdles between Trump and the White House.

Snip

The term “nuclear option” sounds dramatic, but what unfolded was exactly that: a procedural detonation that reshaped the U.S. judiciary—and cleared the runway for Donald Trump’s legal invincibility. In 2017, Mitch McConnell pulled the nuclear trigger for Supreme Court confirmations. Facing a filibuster on Trump’s nomination of Neil Gorsuch, McConnell changed the rules to force him through with just 51 votes.


• 3 Supreme Court justices: Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett
• Over 200 lower court judges, all fast-tracked under the new simple-majority rules

Snip

Just seven days after Trump lost the 2020 election to President Joe Biden, the Senate rammed through Judge Aileen Cannon—a Federalist Society loyalist—to the federal bench, again via the nuclear option. The seat? It would later oversee Trump’s classified documents case.

Think about that. Before he even walked out of the White House with stolen materials and a failed insurrection attempt, Donald Trump had already secured the judge who would protect him. He wasn't just breaking the law—he was fortifying his legal escape route in advance, with an assist from Senate Republicans.

Snip

Trump’s allies—under the guise of investigating voter fraud—illegally breached election equipment in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, and Colorado. What should have been a five-alarm fire in American democracy was instead buried beneath strategic delays, bureaucratic filings, and a crowded judicial calendar.

https://thiswillhold.substack.com/p/she-won-part-ii-seven-judges-direct

Edit:
* Musk 6/5/25 “Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.”

[gab13by13]

1. But but but

people are now attacking Kamala.

I posted statistics about all of the anomalies that occurred only in the battleground states. The same day votes surged for Krasnov only in those states, they did not do that in any other state.

The odds that Kamala did not flip one red district to blue were unbelievable, it never happens.

It pisses me off also when especially Democrats analyze what Kamala and Walz did wrong, they did nothing wrong, they won the election.

[Botany]

4. Read the article under Trump's effort to infiltrate voting systems @ the link

With the picture of Gov. Kemp of Georgia posing with poll workers wearing t-shirts
that had the back door codes for voting equipment on them. Fuckers are proud to
be cheaters.

[yellow dahlia]

34. I too have been critical of the Democratic strategists encouraging self-flagellation.

It is a convenient narrative for the "other side" that the Dems are completely lost and out of touch w/ the people.

Propaganda from somewhere? Psy-ops?

[Initech]

42. It wasn't Kamala's fault.

I feel like the assholes that be (Heritage, Federalist, Fox, etc) were going to install Trump back in the White House no matter how much we didn't want it.

It's time to get rid of all these clowns at every level.

[WSHazel]

2. The statistical analysis is the strongest argument

Does someone have a link to a deeper explanation? The only ones I have seen are pretty high level and summary.

[gab13by13]

3. They showed the bell curves and the works,

The odds of same day voting surges for Krasnov only happening in the battleground states were off the charts.

[annielion]

19. I agree the statistical analysis is the strongest argument

I've been looking at ElectionTruthAlliance.org and SmartElections.us for statistical analysis.

[yellow dahlia]

35. Look up Election Truth Alliance.

[Mr.Bee]

5. I knew election night

something was up. It just wasn't real, but they needed to move faster.
There is roughly two and a half months between election and inauguration
to conduct investigations, not 8 months after the fact!
This happened with Gore. The truth came out but Bush was sworn in,
and they will never undo a 'swearing in', even with a lying, treasonous criminal.

[BComplex]

24. This is what pisses me off so much, Mr. Bee. Election night was definitely NOT real! I've seen elections all my life,

and this one was a computer generated autobahn of votes coming in. It was freaking me out even at the time. Hell! It was freaking Rachel Maddow and Joy Reid out at the time! Did you see their faces? They were in as much shock as I was! And the democrats did NOTHING!!!!!

[yellow dahlia]

37. Agreed!

[yellow dahlia]

36. I said the same thing on election night.

It didn't take long for final results. Why?

He made sure he had a "majority"...he wanted a "mandate" to soothe his fragile ego.

He made sure he "won" all seven swing states, so he could brag.

[Clouds Passing]

6. The calling of the "winner" on election night was way too fast.

[BonnieJW]

7. I also suspected this on Election day

The question is what can be done? How do we have a legitimate midterm?

[Mr.Bee]

8. This Country needs To Learn Patience

The month of November should be all about counting and recounting all ballots.
November 30th should announce who won.

[msfiddlestix]

13. that goal would be virtually impossible when the reporting election results are managed by big media, Reich wing allies.

efforts to properly investigate to get to the facts, will require investigating and revealing to the public big media's role in all of it, from campaign polling, candidate debate machinations, bending candidates stories whether covering up clear corruption, or implying corruption sans evidence.
countless examples of how the criminal TSF had been given free of charge media coverage and platform before and during campaigns. etc etc etc etc

[NJCher]

20. That's ridiculous

I'm not kowtowing to big media. They just damn well wait. Eff them.

I like the idea of November being devoted to counting and re-counting.

[questionseverything]

23. We don't need a month to count, we need smaller precincts

[Kaleva]

9. If true, then there's no reason to vote in 2026

As the outcome has already been determined.

If not true, then we all need to work as hard as we can to take back the House and maybe even the Senate in 2026.

[Fil1957]

11. Even if elections are rigged, there IS a reason to vote, because

it much harder to steal an election if it's not close.

[littlemissmartypants]

16. Exactly!!

People who sit out are despicable, imo.

[EdmondDantes_]

27. How do you figure that?

If people were able to rig all the local voting machines, do you think they would only shift .5% of the vote and hope that was enough or would they be smart enough to code it so their side won regardless of the vote?

The conspiracy theories just keep going and everything is claimed as evidence.

[stillcool]

29. if they were smart.....yes

close elections have always been the easiest to rig. When the gap is too wide prior to voting, as it was with Kamala, it's questionable from day 1. I don't think any of the elections Republicans have stolen have been all that close. They know where they need votes. The ability to hack into elections offices as they did that summer had to be a big assist in many ways.

[EdmondDantes_]

47. What are you talking about?

The polling was razor thin prior to the election. There's nothing that would suggest the election wasn't close. Your own theory isn't logically consistent as to the actual evidence.

[stillcool]

48. I'm talking about elections...since 2000

the only polling I'm interested is the polling place where I vote. You believe whatever poll you want. Of course, Kamala won more votes, but who cares?

[Chemical Bill]

40. In 2004 there were shifts of up to 9%.

In 2000 they stole it in plain sight.

Have you read The Conyers Report? Stealing elections is not a theory.

[EdmondDantes_]

46. It's definitely not a theory. It's an unfounded conspiracy theory

Utterly unsupported by any evidence and should be dismissed.

[Chemical Bill]

55. So you didn't study anything about the 2000...

Florida presidential election results, for example the mandatory machine recount that wasn't done, or the Brooks Brothers Riot, or the US Supreme Court decision stopping the recounts, or even the voter purges conducted by Katherine Harris against a court order. I understand your POV now....

[yellow dahlia]

38. Exactly. When there is a clear mandate, it is harder to mess with the numbers.

[Kaleva]

43. Why is it harder?

Hillary won the popular vote in 2016 by a comfortable margin and yet still lost the election.

[questionseverything]

22. If we vote in overwhelming numbers, we can overcome the rig

Remember way back to 2000 when volusia county had 16,000 negative votes?

I think that’s an example of the program moving so many numbers it can’t make the results make sense

[BComplex]

25. That is naive in my opinion: an app can make an outcome with or without any votes. Just ask elon musk's son.

All you need the programming to say is to add votes from column A to column B without changing the total number of votes.

[questionseverything]

28. Well to stop voting isn't the option we should be spreading

Yes cheating has probably gotten more sophisticated since 2000 but there are still clues,

For example, why did musk need names?

Perhaps to make the number of voters on list equal the number of votes

[stillcool]

31. yeah...but that's stealing

no matter what you steal. People have the best alarms, the best vaults, the best security, but thieves figure out a way. As do the guards. Everyone learns, adapts and wins some until another Musk comes along

[Chemical Bill]

41. I remember that....

I remember they said they "fixed" it.

I can't believe that some people say we should just roll over and die.

[Jeebo]

54. I profoundly disagree, Kaleva.

Even if the vote is rigged and the outcome is predetermined, there still is plenty of reason for Democrats to get out and vote. That reason is: If they're going to cheat to "win" elections, then at least, we ought to MAKE them cheat. We need to keep on MAKING them HAVE to do it. If we don't even MAKE them do it, THAT'S when they've REALLY won. Think about it.

— Ron

[Kaleva]

56. So we'd be participating in Soviet style electrons then

[ancianita]

10. THANK YOU!

Holy shit. It's an election crime syndicate.

[yellow dahlia]

39. They are SO good at criming.

They are incompetent at everything else.

[Kingofalldems]

12. Kick and rec.

[1WorldHope]

14. So what are we going to do about it?

He/they are destroying this country. Can't we the people sue? Or is this the part where Representative democracy screws us? They cheat to get in then we truly have no representation. I know that we don't have any representation in Nebraska.

[stillcool]

30. People need to get involved in their

state government that runs their elections. That's the only way. There usually is a flurry of activity from lawyers, but the state governments have the power to squash that stuff, and it's all after the fact. Perhaps the mobilization of the American people can grow and continue so that there are voices in every state that demand safe, secure, and verifiable elections.

[Resist160]

15. Seven Judges

For anyone who is not on Tik Tol, people have been talking about this issue since the day after the election. A guy was on the Joe Rogan podcast and stated Musk had an app that said El Taco won even before the polls were closed ON THE EAST COAST. People claimed their votes were not counted. In NC, the people voted in all blue candidates except for an election official of some kind but all those people voted red for the president. An example, experts looked over the voting data and said there were problems. Now a county in New York State is going to court to dispute voting results. Some are saying PA had irregularities. But of course, you don't hear anything on msm about it.
Remember before the election, he said him & Johnson had a plan. Then the orange idiot told people he doesn't need their vote.

[gfarber]

17. Pipeline Of Judges

A pipeline of judges, well-fed,
By FedSoc and Mitch at the head.
With satellites high, and courts standing by,
Trump paved his escape path ahead.
Justice bent while democracy bled.

With judges pre-picked and well-groomed,
And satellites quietly zoomed,
The runway was clear,
For Donnie, no fear—
His courtroom escape plan was plumed.

The judges were placed with great care,
While satellites watched from the air.
The law was undone,
Before ballots were run—
A coup wrapped in judicial flair.

[NJCher]

21. damn, that was good

did you write that?

If so,

[forthemiddle]

18. The article is correct that McConnell used the "nuclear option" for SCOTUS in 2017

It was actually Harry Reid and Democrats in 2013 that are responsible for the Federal judges, and ultimately responsible for Judge Cannon.

[BComplex]

26. Thanks so much for this Botany!! It's time this country faced the truth about what is going on, and it's

a shitload bigger than "mexican and black men and white women" didn't vote for trump, which is the CRAP we got from MSM after the bad news came out as to who supposedly won.

[stillcool]

32. got to take some time to comprehend

what I'm reading. Plowing through like I'm on a race to the finish isn't working Thank you so much for the link!!

[B.See]

44. Interesting stuff.

[yellow dahlia]

33. Yes. I have said that controlling the results in the House and Senate were part of the equation.

"They" had to ensure that a true take over was possible...unchecked.

Does anyone believe that Bernie Moreno won anything? Have things really gone so whackadoodle that he looks better than Sherrod Brown?

[BComplex]

45. Sherrod Brown was one of the seats that was blatantly stolen by the very corrupt silicon valley money in Ohio

Ohio...home to gym jordan.

[yellow dahlia]

49. Agreed.

I don't know why people think the 2026 election will turn things around. "They" won't let it. We need to keep attention on the corruption, the take over, the Democracy, the Constitution.

The clearer the mandate, the harder it is to cheat.

[tritsofme]

50. If Brown's seat was blatantly stolen, why do you suppose Brown he hasn't so much as complained?

Does he not know?

Does he not care?

Is he part of the scheme to cover up the obvious and “blatant theft”?

That’s why this Trump copy-cat election denial stuff is so delusional.

[BComplex]

51. I think it's more delusional to believe that the republicans won.

[tritsofme]

52. So why do you suppose Brown hasn't said anything about an election that was blatantly stolen from him?

[tritsofme]

53. LOL, does that make Brown delusional for believing he lost his own election?

Don’t you see how incredibly silly this conspiracy theory is?

[malaise]

57. K & R

For truth