Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,995 posts)
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 03:09 PM 18 hrs ago

Trump's DOJ is appealing the E Jean Carroll verdict on grounds that rape & defamation are in the scope of his duties

The Justice Department is looking to intervene on behalf of President Donald Trump in his appeal of the defamation verdict awarded to E. Jean Carroll, who accused him of sexually assaulting her in a New York department store dressing room.

In a joint motion filed last week with Trump’s legal team, the Justice Department said the federal Westfall Act, which provides immunity to government employees for actions taken within the scope of their duties, should apply to Trump.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-justice-department-steps-in-for-him-on-e-jean-carroll-appeal/
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's DOJ is appealing the E Jean Carroll verdict on grounds that rape & defamation are in the scope of his duties (Original Post) Miles Archer 18 hrs ago OP
I first thought this HAD to be satire... regnaD kciN 18 hrs ago #1
The rape happened before he was president. So this argument can only apply to the defamation. unblock 18 hrs ago #2
that's the scope of the request, the OP is sensationalizing it but I do understand the sentiment Shellback Squid 17 hrs ago #12
This is real? D_Master81 18 hrs ago #3
What's even more insane is MLWR 16 hrs ago #22
Fuck that fucking adjudicated rapist. Basso8vb 18 hrs ago #4
Pam Bondi is a complete idiot, MarineCombatEngineer 18 hrs ago #5
He belongs in the Ronald Reagan Home for the Criminally Insane. greatauntoftriplets 18 hrs ago #6
That would have been during the Pisswig's dweller 18 hrs ago #7
SCUMBAGS, All of them!! bluestarone 18 hrs ago #8
Bondi law license needs to be revoked Sugarmaggie 18 hrs ago #9
You'd think the history of Trump lawyers would be a cautionary tale, huh William Seger 16 hrs ago #21
Convicted by a jury of his peers. Ping Tung 18 hrs ago #10
Not the Onion? malaise 18 hrs ago #11
Yes, but he also thinks the Ten Commandments is his "to do list." surfered 17 hrs ago #13
Breaking them, you mean! dchill 16 hrs ago #17
As my mom would have said: "...more nerve than the guy who ate the first oyster." calimary 17 hrs ago #14
" which provides immunity to government employees for actions taken within the scope of their duties" Solly Mack 16 hrs ago #15
When I read the headline, I thought it might be because his fingers are not big enough for penetration rape. spike jones 16 hrs ago #16
Scumbucket. electric_blue68 16 hrs ago #18
I guess Trump just CAN'T believe... dchill 16 hrs ago #19
Yep. He could rob Ft. Knox (maybe he and Elon have) and say he had the right to do it allegorical oracle 15 hrs ago #27
Yes xuplate 16 hrs ago #20
Biden should have had Trump executed liberalgunwilltravel 15 hrs ago #23
?!????!!!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????????????????????????????????????????? nt LAS14 15 hrs ago #24
What an argument... Figarosmom 15 hrs ago #25
Bookmark this for future reference: PAM BONDI IS A HACK no_hypocrisy 15 hrs ago #26
So, that's the definition of "shameless?" -misanthroptimist 14 hrs ago #28
Can nationwide jus primae noctis be far behind? (n/t) DJ Synikus Makisimus 13 hrs ago #29

unblock

(54,991 posts)
2. The rape happened before he was president. So this argument can only apply to the defamation.
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 03:14 PM
18 hrs ago

And any reasonable court would easily see that defaming a private citizen who relates only to a civil suit and not even to any pending legislation isn't remotely within presidential duties.

But with today's courts, who knows....

Shellback Squid

(9,326 posts)
12. that's the scope of the request, the OP is sensationalizing it but I do understand the sentiment
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 04:11 PM
17 hrs ago

D_Master81

(2,012 posts)
3. This is real?
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 03:16 PM
18 hrs ago

I thought this can’t be. It’s insane that a sitting President is arguing this let alone bringing it to trial.

greatauntoftriplets

(177,493 posts)
6. He belongs in the Ronald Reagan Home for the Criminally Insane.
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 03:17 PM
18 hrs ago
to the Airplane! movies for that line.

dweller

(26,399 posts)
7. That would have been during the Pisswig's
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 03:19 PM
18 hrs ago

pre-term in 1996 ? Or his pre-pre term ?

🤔


✌🏻

Sugarmaggie

(145 posts)
9. Bondi law license needs to be revoked
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 03:24 PM
18 hrs ago

Attorneys under Trump fit this criteria as well:

A revoked law license means an attorney can no longer practice law in that jurisdiction.

This is typically due to serious misconduct, such as unethical conduct, criminal activity, or incompetence.

The revocation is decided by the state bar association, not the courts.

Here's a more detailed explanation:
What it means:
A revoked law license signifies that an attorney is no longer authorized to represent clients in court, provide legal advice, or engage in any other activities that require a law license.
Reasons for revocation:

Law licenses can be revoked for a variety of reasons, including:
Unethical conduct: This can include conflicts of interest, misrepresentation, or failure to uphold ethical standards.
Criminal activity: Serious criminal offenses, such as fraud or theft, can lead to revocation.
Incompetence: If an attorney demonstrates a lack of ability to practice law, they may face revocation.

Ping Tung

(2,093 posts)
10. Convicted by a jury of his peers.
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 03:50 PM
18 hrs ago

Of course, Donny would only consider "a jury of his peers" as one consisting of hand picked white males wearing silly red caps, who drive hummers. that he pardoned for assaulting congress. Or had intimate relations with a couch.

Solly Mack

(94,787 posts)
15. " which provides immunity to government employees for actions taken within the scope of their duties"
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 05:30 PM
16 hrs ago

Just following orders.

Of course the DOJ's reasoning is sickening.

spike jones

(1,851 posts)
16. When I read the headline, I thought it might be because his fingers are not big enough for penetration rape.
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 05:32 PM
16 hrs ago

electric_blue68

(20,848 posts)
18. Scumbucket.
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 05:45 PM
16 hrs ago

Smarmy, violent, etc

Someday.... sooner than later
may Justice catch up with him bigtime!

dchill

(42,010 posts)
19. I guess Trump just CAN'T believe...
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 05:45 PM
16 hrs ago

...that anything he's ever done or ever will do should be against the law. An exceptional definition of "privilege!"

allegorical oracle

(4,617 posts)
27. Yep. He could rob Ft. Knox (maybe he and Elon have) and say he had the right to do it
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 06:23 PM
15 hrs ago

because it's an official Presidential Act and he has immunity.

xuplate

(59 posts)
20. Yes
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 05:47 PM
16 hrs ago

I’m sure he was chosen by his pretend god to rape and pillage—-and millions of idiots would agree.

LAS14

(15,145 posts)
24. ?!????!!!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????????????????????????????????????????? nt
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 06:02 PM
15 hrs ago

Figarosmom

(5,212 posts)
25. What an argument...
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 06:07 PM
15 hrs ago

So raping women is now a presidential duty? Makes me wonder about every female that works for him then...is that part if their job?

no_hypocrisy

(51,174 posts)
26. Bookmark this for future reference: PAM BONDI IS A HACK
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 06:23 PM
15 hrs ago

Got it?

A hack.

I wouldn't let her prosecute a speeding ticket.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's DOJ is appealing ...