Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

In It to Win It

(10,454 posts)
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 06:43 AM Yesterday

Late last night, a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction barring DOGE's access to sensitive Social Security data

Kyle Cheney
@kyledcheney

BUSY NIGHT FOR THE COURTS: Late last night, a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction barring DOGE’s access to sensitive Social Securitt data, saying the government flouted the law to provide unfettered access to DOGE without a reasonable basis. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.577321/gov.uscourts.mdd.577321.146.0.pdf





5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Late last night, a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction barring DOGE's access to sensitive Social Security data (Original Post) In It to Win It Yesterday OP
Great news - Get thee to the greatest page malaise Yesterday #1
Now maybe some judge sill restrict fleaon from broadcasting sensitive US govt data to ruskies? SheltieLover Yesterday #2
Should be permanent with prejudice. GreenWave Yesterday #3
I think it's obvious that willfully or unwilfully DOGE's passwords have managed to get into Baitball Blogger 23 hrs ago #4
Does that include access from Russia? mackdaddy 22 hrs ago #5

Baitball Blogger

(49,805 posts)
4. I think it's obvious that willfully or unwilfully DOGE's passwords have managed to get into
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 10:58 AM
23 hrs ago

Russian hands. So the only sensible thing is to stop DOGE's data access until we can investigate and find out if those passwords were passed on willfully or unwilfully.

mackdaddy

(1,750 posts)
5. Does that include access from Russia?
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 11:29 AM
22 hrs ago

You have to be explicit in language in judicial orders so Steven Miller can interpret it exactly backwards.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Late last night, a federa...