Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA Conversation With Jeffrey Goldberg About His Extraordinary Scoop
https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2025/03/jeffrey-goldberg-group-chat-military-houthi-yemen/682160/No paywall link
https://www.smry.ai/proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theatlantic.com%2Fnewsletters%2Farchive%2F2025%2F03%2Fjeffrey-goldberg-group-chat-military-houthi-yemen%2F682160%2F
The Trump administration has provided many jaw-dropping moments, but few have been as shocking as editor in chief Jeffrey Goldbergs scoop published today. Goldberg reported on how he was inadvertently added to a discussion of a military strike on Houthi militias in Yemen, conducted over the encrypted messaging app Signal. In essence, a reporter was invited to listen while the nations top security officials weighed and debated a military action, and was sent detailed information about the strike.
Even President Donald Trump seemed unaware of the breach. Youre saying that they had what? he replied when asked about the news. Trump added that he is not a big fan of The Atlantic, something hes previously made clear, and which makes the unintentional leak all the more remarkable. A spokesperson for the National Security Council said, This appears to be an authentic message chain, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain.
I called Goldberg this afternoon to learn more about how the story came about and what the disclosure reveals about the Trump administration. This interview has been condensed and edited.
David A. Graham: Has anything like this ever happened to you before?
Jeffrey Goldberg: I think that on one level, this is very relatable. Everyone has sent a text or an email to an unintended recipient, and sometimes theyve embarrassed themselves by doing that. This is, I would say, at a different levelbut it kind of proves a point, which is that theres a reason people who work on sensitive issues in the government arent supposed to use Signal, even though it is end-to-end encrypted. Anyone can use Signal, so if youre not careful, you might pull into your conversation a Houthi sympathizer or a magazine editor.
Our colleague Shane Harris points out that the phones of top senior defense and national-security and intelligence officials are targets of intelligence operations. Imagine what you can do if you saw everything that the CIA director may be texting, even on a secure phoneespecially on a secure phone. Im mindful of the fact that the Trump team has already dealt with a serious issue in the securing of sensitive documents in Mar-a-Lago. If youre going to make a big deal about Hillary Clintons emails, you may want to have excellent communication hygiene.
*snip*
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

A Conversation With Jeffrey Goldberg About His Extraordinary Scoop (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Mar 25
OP
In retrospect, it is astonishing how calm & contained Goldberg was Friday evening on Washington Week which he hosts
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 25
#1
Bernardo de La Paz
(55,334 posts)1. In retrospect, it is astonishing how calm & contained Goldberg was Friday evening on Washington Week which he hosts
The conversation was Thursday, show was Friday and this was revealed yesterday.
Goldberg kept a secret better than Hegseth & Waltz.