Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(54,275 posts)
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 05:31 PM Mar 25

A Conversation With Jeffrey Goldberg About His Extraordinary Scoop

https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2025/03/jeffrey-goldberg-group-chat-military-houthi-yemen/682160/

No paywall link
https://www.smry.ai/proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theatlantic.com%2Fnewsletters%2Farchive%2F2025%2F03%2Fjeffrey-goldberg-group-chat-military-houthi-yemen%2F682160%2F

The Trump administration has provided many jaw-dropping moments, but few have been as shocking as editor in chief Jeffrey Goldberg’s scoop published today. Goldberg reported on how he was inadvertently added to a discussion of a military strike on Houthi militias in Yemen, conducted over the encrypted messaging app Signal. In essence, a reporter was invited to listen while the nation’s top security officials weighed and debated a military action, and was sent detailed information about the strike.

Even President Donald Trump seemed unaware of the breach. “You’re saying that they had what?” he replied when asked about the news. Trump added that he is “not a big fan of The Atlantic,” something he’s previously made clear, and which makes the unintentional leak all the more remarkable. A spokesperson for the National Security Council said, “This appears to be an authentic message chain, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain.”

I called Goldberg this afternoon to learn more about how the story came about and what the disclosure reveals about the Trump administration. This interview has been condensed and edited.

David A. Graham: Has anything like this ever happened to you before?

Jeffrey Goldberg: I think that on one level, this is very relatable. Everyone has sent a text or an email to an unintended recipient, and sometimes they’ve embarrassed themselves by doing that. This is, I would say, at a different level—but it kind of proves a point, which is that there’s a reason people who work on sensitive issues in the government aren’t supposed to use Signal, even though it is end-to-end encrypted. Anyone can use Signal, so if you’re not careful, you might pull into your conversation a Houthi sympathizer or a magazine editor.

Our colleague Shane Harris points out that the phones of top senior defense and national-security and intelligence officials are targets of intelligence operations. Imagine what you can do if you saw everything that the CIA director may be texting, even on a secure phone—especially on a secure phone. I’m mindful of the fact that the Trump team has already dealt with a serious issue in the securing of sensitive documents in Mar-a-Lago. If you’re going to make a big deal about Hillary Clinton’s emails, you may want to have excellent communication hygiene.

*snip*
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Conversation With Jeffrey Goldberg About His Extraordinary Scoop (Original Post) Nevilledog Mar 25 OP
In retrospect, it is astonishing how calm & contained Goldberg was Friday evening on Washington Week which he hosts Bernardo de La Paz Mar 25 #1

Bernardo de La Paz

(55,334 posts)
1. In retrospect, it is astonishing how calm & contained Goldberg was Friday evening on Washington Week which he hosts
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 07:11 PM
Mar 25

The conversation was Thursday, show was Friday and this was revealed yesterday.

Goldberg kept a secret better than Hegseth & Waltz.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Conversation With Jeffr...