General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMusk: "We're going straight to Mars. The Moon is a distraction."
Elon Musk: Were going straight to Mars. The Moon is a distraction.The speculation is that NASA will dump Boeing and Lockheed Martin. Bezos' Blue Origin will 'take' the Moon, and Musk will have Mars. What does it feel like living in a Tech-Bro-Bannana Republic? A place with something like speculation like this.
Then, on Thursday evening, he added this: "No, were going straight to Mars. The Moon is a distraction.
https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/01/elon-musk-were-going-straight-to-mars-the-moon-is-a-distraction/
Blue Original already has a NASA contract for a Lunar Lander. The speculation is Bezo will be given a contract for the rocket as well. Queue the Washington Post critique.
Elon, may I respectfully suggest that you go plant a South African flag on the surface of the Sun.
Celerity
(47,022 posts)FalloutShelter
(12,875 posts)TheBlackAdder
(29,075 posts)Trump and Musk both reminds me of the opening of this song.
His claim was phrased quite simply,
Though he never voiced it loud
I am he, the chosen one.
In his name they could slaughter,
For his name they could die.
Though many there were believed in him,
Still more were sure he lied
But they'll fight the battle on.
A song that pretty much means that there will always be a charlatan, and when one goes another replaces.
sakabatou
(43,316 posts)People cheer, not caring for the announcer making realistic claims.
speak easy
(10,741 posts)is. "I'm going straight to Mars." Eat your own dogfood Elon.
NickB79
(19,691 posts)But I encourage Musk to be first in line to step on the Red Planet.
Botany
(72,737 posts)
that long of a flight or on the surface of Mars but if Musk wants to go Im all 4 it.
* at least that is my understanding of that stuff. And I do have a 2.3 from
Ohio University which is the same as a PhD from M.I.T. and 3 Nobel Prizes.
Auggie
(31,942 posts)Class of 79 reporting in
Botany
(72,737 posts)I am sorry if I did anything to you or your friends because I was really high @ the time.
Xavier Breath
(5,215 posts)Auggie
(31,942 posts)GreenWave
(9,543 posts)Borogove
(72 posts)0rganism
(24,771 posts)It's like nature hands us a built-in space station full of ice and hydrogen isotopes perfect for fusion reactors with a low-gravity environment ideal for superscale construction of colonies and craft, less than a light minute from home.
Musk wants humanity to ditch all that for a risky shot at a barren wasteland of a planet beset by dust storms with little in the way of observed resources, no planetary magnetic field, and at least one moon with a sharply-decaying orbit, far enough away from Earth that any colony operates entirely on its own, with near-zero hope of extraction if anything goes wrong. Stupid and Expensive, rolled into one big government contract for Musk. Maybe he's fixated on mining the asteroid belt or some such. He's now positioned to singlehandedly and permanently ruin the USA's chances at a strong space program with a thriving off-world colony.
We are on the verge of losing everything.
CrispyQ
(38,654 posts)I weep for our future, when it could have been so bright.
rampartd
(1,013 posts)this ricardo montalban wanna be and his harry mudd sidekick give us soylent green
._.
(1,151 posts)The Moon is a known quantity, and that quantity is military as well as commercial. Military bases and mining for Helium III.
Musk knows this.
speak easy
(10,741 posts)but does not want to carry the can on the first mission(s) that may go pear shaped. Astronauts stranded on the Moon? Bezos/NASA take the blame.
Autumn
(46,748 posts)Johonny
(22,305 posts)Our rovers and satellites are doing science while he plays make believe world builder.
Rebl2
(15,042 posts)on the first rocket to mars musty musk. Oh, and take the orange one and his family with you.
Prairie Gates
(3,606 posts)spapeggy
(98 posts)Good luck
speak easy
(10,741 posts)https://www.space.com/space-exploration/launches-spacecraft/blue-origin-ready-to-launch-1st-new-glenn-rocket
Wounded Bear
(60,896 posts)So far, we haven't had any fatalities in space. The lives we have lost have either been at launch or on re-entry. Musk is going to lose people in interstellar space.
lapfog_1
(30,250 posts)interstellar is a *lot* farther away. By some estimates even Voyager won't enter interstellar space for 100s of more years ( needs to cross the Ort belt ).
Wounded Bear
(60,896 posts)PCIntern
(27,059 posts)Tired of assholes and assholery.
Blue_Tires
(57,066 posts)Ping Tung
(1,479 posts)dalton99a
(85,061 posts)3catwoman3
(25,783 posts)..Elanus.
Irish_Dem
(60,068 posts)Musk knows exactly what he is doing and how to play the game.
At the same time he can damage the US budget and degrade the US economy.
CrispyQ
(38,654 posts)Metaphorical
(2,353 posts)I have long suspected that Musk was a stranded Martian who has been trying desperately to raise the technology of the planet to a point where he can finally get back home. That's all he actually cares about, and the stupid humans keep thwarting him at every turn.
I agree with other commentators here. Colonizing the moon makes a great deal of sense at this point - it's achievable, there are enough volatiles to reduce the need to cart expensive materials up Earth's gravity well, it has low gravity making it ideal as a staging platform for solar missions, and it is a natural sling shot, adding it's momentum to that of the Earth. It may have the advantage of having lava tubes close to the surface, which can significantly reduce the need to dig. Solar radiation is a big problem on the Lunar surface, and environmental containment becomes much easier in tunnels.
Mars is problematic - you need to be able to create two completely self-contained environments (ship and planet) for anywhere from 3 to 10 years. You have to deal with highly corrosive winds and dust, water is always going to be a problem, the atmosphere is mostly carbon dioxide and there's almost no nitrogen in the atmosphere or phosphorus in the soil, meaning that before you could do farming you'd need an absolutely massive amount of ammonia (and this is not even taking into account the fact that Mars only receives about 45% as much sunlight as Earth.
Mars is a long term (centuries if not millennia) project, and would STILL require that Earth have a moonbase to be able to even attempt.
Blue_Tires
(57,066 posts)A one-way trip is simple enough, but going to Mars, landing, taking off again and landing on Earth in the same reusable spacecraft with enough payload to sustain life and the materials needed to build his utopian colony for genetically superior white folks is pure fantasy daydreaming
lapfog_1
(30,250 posts)NASA's budget is only $25 B a year right now... and that covers both Space and Aeronautics and things like climate change studies, supercomputers, grants to colleges and universities for research, etc.
Eloon can spend $25B of his own money and fund a 5 year mission to Mars without taxpayer money. He might not even notice the drop in his net worth.
In fact, I think he should be on the first rocket to Mars.
Blue_Tires
(57,066 posts)If he's serious about doing this and doing it in a halfway proper manner, the associated costs can break even him... He needs NASA resources and expertise.
Also, when Elmer inevitably loses astronauts in space in his rush to establish his Martian Empire like in "The Expanse" he'll need a convenient scapegoat to blame, like NASA.
Voltaire2
(14,957 posts)So he is, as usual, just bullshitting everyone.
Also, one of the points of a permanent moon base is to drastically reduce the cost of interplanetary flight by staging those flights from the low gravity moon, and eventually creating the tech to produce spacecraft on the moon using resources from the moon. That plan actually makes sense. It is why both the US and China have prioritized permanent moon bases.
My guess is that shithead's interference will guarantee that China gains a strategic advantage with their lunar efforts. Their tech is already excellent, and their oligarchs are subservient to the state, unlike ours.
MineralMan
(148,096 posts)Let him stay there.
Or, better. (post-credit scene from "Don't Look Up":
Keepthesoulalive
(833 posts)Im sure there are more professional terms for his malady. I will simplify and call him a privileged dumbass .
Polly Hennessey
(7,554 posts)ecstatic
(34,553 posts)Not with taxpayers' funds handed to you on a silver platter from trump.
Blue_Tires
(57,066 posts)The "official" go-to authorities on the space program were actual scientists with 'Ph.D' after their name instead of billionaires dropping loud and ultimately meaningless hot takes on social media...
Melon Husk has been talking out his ass for 6+ years that he's only 2 years away from unmanned flights to Mars and 4 years away from manned trips when multiple industry experts say he's still a decade at least from reliable unmanned flights... He's just so fucking desperate to establish his own little pure libertarian paradise on Mars and be worshipped like a god like he's some James Bond villain. My consolation is knowing it almost certainly won't happen in his lifetime unless he lives another 30+ years.
legallyblondeNYC
(57 posts)Any update on the plan to get those Americans home?
Voltaire2
(14,957 posts)And yes there is a plan, not only a plan but a schedule. It is really expensive to travel there, and there is no emergency. So on schedule a vehicle will arrive and they will go home.
Oopsie Daisy
(4,585 posts)* ever. What a waste of money and lives. Robotics can do more for less, for longer, and safer.
Midnight Writer
(23,186 posts)If we can spend billions subsidizing billionaires like Musk, subsidizing oil companies and pharma companies, subsidizing defense contractors, subsidizing corporate farms, then why shouldn't we provide decent jobs for scientists and engineers?
I'd love to see a massive expansion of government jobs. Subsidize internships, apprenticeships, entry level jobs, and rehabilitative jobs for those that need them. I believe a lot of our problems, such as poverty, crime, homelessness, and drug addiction, are the result of folks who have no decent jobs, no prospects, no marketable skills, no hope for the future.
We provided jobs during the Great Depression to keep America moving, and it was a magnificent success. Why do we not do this now?
An economy built from the bottom up serves ALL the people, not just the oligarchs. The oligarchs are doing fine. They don't need subsidies. It is the poor and working class that is in crisis and need attention.
allegorical oracle
(3,500 posts)"You're a real riot, Leon, a real riot!"
Hardy Har Har.
speak easy
(10,741 posts)Prairie_Seagull
(3,829 posts)would be enough to motivate more moon exploration first.
edhopper
(35,083 posts)with our robot explorers. We can do more for so much less by expanding that program.
And Musk promised self driving cars by 2020, how is that working out.
ismnotwasm
(42,484 posts)applegrove
(123,738 posts)for a few months, they can't walk. So good luck with Mars.
Voltaire2
(14,957 posts)The trip using known technology is around 17 months.
Bluethroughu
(6,104 posts)Adios...your ego is not your amigo.
Aviation Pro
(13,597 posts)You think Helium 3 is a distraction? Oh, that's right, you don't know fuck all about science.
videohead5
(2,494 posts)And take Trump with him.