General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI am without a doubt the dumbest man on Earth
So for weeks and weeks our daughter has told us we MUST watch the movie "Wicked."
I read the Wikipedia article on it where I found it was without a doubt one of the greatest productions of all times.
Tonight we found it on DirecTV OnDemand, rent, $14.95 for two days.
I gave up 20 minutes into it. Don't understand a word of it, can't follow the plot or the characters, cannot figure out what it's about, cannot understand most of the lyrics.
I'm too goddam old.
Elessar Zappa
(16,182 posts)Serious question.
Faux pas
(15,457 posts)to see it, they've killed any interest I might have had by advertising it so much it pissed me off.
So don't feel bad at least you tried.
CentralMass
(15,634 posts)KentuckyWoman
(6,902 posts)Almost anything made before 1990 I can watch without the closed caption pretty well at a reasonable volume. After 1990 it gets hit and miss, and anything after 2000 even with closed caption good luck. Even commercials. I can't understand any of the words because the other sounds are too damn loud. The mix is completely wrong.
I thought it was old lady syndrome but the youngers in my family have the same complaint.
live love laugh
(14,590 posts)Last edited Sat Jan 4, 2025, 02:20 AM - Edit history (1)
The close caption writer, they interviewed, said that many of the recent films are actually made with bad sound quality. (I wish I could find the clip Im going to look for it and I will post it here if I find it as he can explain it better.)
The biggest takeaway was that even the close caption writers themselves actually struggle to capture the words spoken in many programs. It has little to do with the audience. The issue is poor sound quality.
live love laugh
(14,590 posts)?si=8hoUe3SYBPad5JVj
nuxvomica
(13,049 posts)Filmmaking is, or should be, a form of theatre and in theatre "the plays the thing" but filmmakers no longer revere good dialogue like they used to. Most movies nowadays have no memorable lines or scintillating conversations because the soundscape and the visuals are supposed to tell the story. And if that's not enough to tell you what's happening, they add non-diegetic vocal music because the screenwriters can't convey the character's inner feelings without it. One of my favorite movies is My Dinner with Andre so that's where I'm coming from.
allegorical oracle
(3,500 posts)built-in DVR and I tape films. Many are Hitchcock and Merchant & Ivory. Enjoy story lines, twisting plots, lively dialogue...not two hours of explosions.
TheProle
(3,107 posts)Rebl2
(15,042 posts)purposely make movies with bad sound quality? I know some tv shows have music sometimes that, for me at least, drowns out whats being said. Its annoying.
live love laugh
(14,590 posts)Hopefully they will figure it out and fix the problem.
duncang
(3,749 posts)Ive had one for years. My first one went out after about 4-5 years. I mainly got it since I do have hearing problems.
It has some features other soundbars dont have. It can lower background sound while keeping the voice range normal. It does take a little goofing with at first since theres several options that may affect other options. But to me its been well worth it.
Attilatheblond
(4,685 posts)Sound to damping down music and other background sounds so dialogue is more clear to hear.
moonscape
(5,409 posts)seems to be getting louder and louder, is killing me!
Response to KentuckyWoman (Reply #4)
BannonsLiver This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bernardo de La Paz
(51,471 posts)They fill the frequency spectrum so that there is sound in all the ranges all the time. Vocals are not isolated and highlighted. Likewise for films.
When Spector was doing it, it was called "a solid wall of sound", but even he knew to lay off it for parts of the song.
cbabe
(4,357 posts)works for him. Imitators mess it up for years.
LiberalArkie
(16,713 posts)DavidDvorkin
(19,968 posts)Intractable
(639 posts)And I have great hearing and an excellent home theater.
MadameButterfly
(2,059 posts)with a variety of English accents. Or the desire for natural effect over the old stentorian stage voices.
Intractable
(639 posts)1. To movie directors, the sound is an afterthought.
2. On modern cable TV and Blu-ray disks, the video and sound are compressed such that the signals can fit into the allotted bandwidth, which is never big enough.
This is nothing new. People have been mishearing the lyrics to popular music since the advent of recorded media. When the lyrics mattered (e.g., Pink Floyd), they were printed in the album inserts.
In the famous song Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds, the words the girl with kaleidoscope eyes were infamously misheard as the girl with colitis goes by.
MadameButterfly
(2,059 posts)I thought Let it Be said "Mother Bear re-comes to me"
I can't believe I just admitted that on a public forum
Intractable
(639 posts)As for myself, at the time, as a child, I didn't realize it was a religious song.
Young as I was, I could see that Let It Be was a much weaker album than the mysterious White Album or the fun Abby Road.
MadameButterfly
(2,059 posts)I think I was a little younger. I came to know the albums some years after they came out. I recall hearing "I've Just Seen a Face" on the radio and wondering why that wasn't just as good as a Beatles song. Then I learned it was a Beatles song. It's funny out of all the songs out there I could have asked that question about, it was a Beatles song I chose. Though it does have a folky western quality to it, so my confusion perhaps excusable.
tavernier
(13,298 posts)Paul is singing about his mother. Her name was Mary and she died very young. She came to him in a dream when he was having some emotional issues. It has nothing to do with religion.
Intractable
(639 posts)Inspired by his mother, yes. But, a simple google search on "Let it Be lyrics" says that many feel otherwise, and that Paul wrote those lyrics in a manner open to interpretation, like so many Beatles songs.
Funny how the music sounds so churchy. I'm sure that's just a coincidence. There couldn't possibly be an intentional double entendre, between the name of his mother and that of Jesus.
Response to MadameButterfly (Reply #22)
Mosby This message was self-deleted by its author.
BannonsLiver
(18,291 posts)Occams razor.
Intractable
(639 posts)I wouldn't shave with that Occam's razor.
Response to Intractable (Reply #51)
BannonsLiver This message was self-deleted by its author.
Intractable
(639 posts)I'm also a sound engineer by trade.
You have a nice day now.
EX500rider
(11,611 posts)4K even better:
4K Blu-ray discs offer advanced audio formats like Dolby Atmos and DTS-X that are rarely offered on earlier Blu-ray discs. These upgraded formats allow 4K Blu-ray discs to support up to 16 audio channels, and the more channels that are supported, the better sound quality that is delivered.
Emile
(31,061 posts)I'm watching sports. Watching "The Voice" it's the only way we can understand what the singer is singing, because they have the music too loud.
NewHendoLib
(60,592 posts)Skittles
(160,529 posts)NOPE
Arazi
(7,122 posts)Ill easily pay $15 to watch it at home with others. I love the ability to pause it when we want. Eat my own snacks. Replay parts we like.
And maybe watch it again the next day if we really liked it
Polybius
(18,562 posts)The op paid too much.
chia
(2,410 posts)Arazi
(7,122 posts)I dont rent movies online often but I didnt think $15 was out of the ordinary for blockbusters still in tier one theater release
Skittles
(160,529 posts)me, I will wait until I don't have to pay extra for a streamed movie, I never had the need to see something "right away"
Orrex
(64,382 posts)Never saw the stage production, but the songs I've heard so far are pretty solid. "Popular" is an absolute delight.
skylucy
(3,872 posts)newer movies. The sound quality is so bad. With all the new technologies, why is that?
Response to skylucy (Reply #9)
BannonsLiver This message was self-deleted by its author.
The Madcap
(678 posts)Not all, mind you, but so much is mixed with no dynamics, a ton of compression, and all gaps filled. It's like "oh, there's a gap between the bass and guitar. Add a big string patch to fill in the entire gap." What you get is a bunch of mud.
By the way, we saw it at the theater, and the sound was reasonably good. You might have an issue with your TV sound settings, depending on your setup.
dgauss
(1,161 posts)A lot of stuff sounds like mud to me too. The fact that it sounded good in a theater is interesting. My guess is that the sound mixing is done on higher end sound systems without enough regard for what might come out of a small, basic TV speaker. Seems ridiculous to overlook that but I can imagine sound engineers getting a little carried away with their high fidelity tools and not backtracking to the actual results on lower fidelity sound systems.
NBachers
(18,215 posts)MadameButterfly
(2,059 posts)in theater and music. I go to concerts where I can't understand any of the lyrics. Only the people who already know the music know what it's about. And others where I can, where the musician has made it a priority for the audience to hear the story. John McCutcheon, for example, you hear every word effortlessly in concert and in recordings. No need for liner notes.
Meowmee
(6,267 posts)It was good. I didnt know there was a movie. Theres a lot of movies Im missing because of the pandemic, etc. but I will wait till they come online.
My all-time favorite, however, is still Cats which I saw a long time ago. I wanted to see Les Mis, but I never got to.
SheltieLover
(60,545 posts)Enjoy!
Meowmee
(6,267 posts)I want to see the Bob Dylan movie first. I may actually go to the theater once I have immunity from my vaccinations. I just got the second set yesterday. And just wear a mask. My brother saw it and said it was good.
John1956PA
(3,459 posts)I have been a fan of hers since she was a member of the cast of Madd TV in the 1990s.
Meowmee
(6,267 posts)I am terrible at remembering names, but I remember Kristin Chenoweth being in it
whoever played the lead role in Cats when we saw it, who was a fill In I think, whose name I also cant remember now, had an amazing voice.
Since KC was in it, it was a lot longer in the past than I thought. I thought it was only like 10 years ago 😹
John1956PA
(3,459 posts)Ms. Buckley way hailed as "The Voice of Broadway." I have enjoyed accessing YouTube videos of her 1980s performances on The Tonight Show With Johnny Carson. She is a very attractive lady. As an aside, I will mention that Ms. Buckley portrayed the ill-fated gym teacher in the movie Carrie (1977).
I caught a matinee of Les Miserables at the Majestic Theater in May 1996. It was presented on a revolving stage. The added comedic break of the scheming couple who ran the inn was amusing. The youth who potrayed the member of the insurgency did a great job. I may still have the playbill.
Contact me anytime you wish to discuss the theater.
Meowmee
(6,267 posts)I was just watching the various renditions of Memory on youtube after posting about this... I am not sure whose rendition I prefer in Cats most, Betty Buckley or Elaine Paige... I think now though listening to Barbra S on youtube it is hers maybe, and the lady who sang it at the one we saw 😁
*I just listened to BB again, she is amazing!
obamanut2012
(27,915 posts)It is excellent
hunter
(39,097 posts)It used to be the sound track you heard on television and early DVDs was mixed for small town theaters with simple analog stereo sound systems. Big city theaters with sophisticated multi-channel sound systems got their own sound tracks.
My home television has an audio setting that's supposed to enhance voices and mix the audio track down to simple stereo but it's never as good as the old style analog sound tracks.
My wife and I watch everything with captions.
kozar
(2,940 posts)Want to spend a day with me,
And accept, you are the 2nd dumbest man on earth!
Koz
Intractable
(639 posts)In my day, Disney movies were composed of hand-drawn animations (often reused from previous movies), and that's the way we liked it.
If I had young kids, I'd definitely take them to Wicked. As for myself, I'm sure I won't watch it even when it's available on streaming. Looks sugary sweet. I'm diabetic.
LeftInTX
(30,972 posts)Star Wars...I still don't know what the heck was going on in that movie. And the hottest guy on campus took me to see it. I had to "fake it".
When I had kids and they started renting it, I had the same problem.
Then I read an article: "Samuel L Jackson doesn't know what is going on with Star Wars". I felt vindicated!!! I was jumping up and down for joy. I found my soulmate. Then my son said, "Mom, it's not what you think. He doesn't know if he's gonna get the part."
Back to the drawing board. For a few minutes I felt vindicated.....
Oh well, I found a soul mate tonight. Even though the movie isn't Star Wars, I can relate!
John1956PA
(3,459 posts)I did not understand the appeal. Alec Guinness's character going on and on about The Force lost me. I never had the interest to see a follow-up Star Wars movie.
Polybius
(18,562 posts)I was a small child when the original trilogy was released, and still have some toys left.
wryter2000
(47,638 posts)I was underwhelmed by the first movie and never bothered with the others.
chia
(2,410 posts)was part of the magic - now they're tiny theaters in 12-plexes. Just not the same.
Kaleva
(38,650 posts)Polybius
(18,562 posts)45 years ago may have been Empire Strikes Back, the second one released. It came out in May 25, 1980.
PJMcK
(23,115 posts)First, its ridiculously long! This film is Part One and corresponds to the first act of the stage musical. But its the same material and songs but its an hour longer! This makes following the story stretched out unnecessarily. I found myself ahead of the story and waiting for the plot to catch up.plus, theres nothing like Hollywood mocking a cow
Additionally, the songs felt chopped up with too much dialog interrupting the musical flow.
The cast, for me, was excellent except for Jeff Goldblum who is so mis-cast hes laughable. Wait till you hear him sing!
The end of the film is light years more exciting, dramatic and plot-fulfilling than anything they did on stage. Its just superior and almost made the two hours worthwhile.
The sound in movies today sucks and its geared toward people with low concentration abilities.
My advice is to skip Pert 2 and read the brilliant novel, Wicked, instead.
WENSTJDON
(139 posts)I read it before I saw the play. And since, I have read the next 3 books in the series. I recommend all of them, if you liked the first book. Gregory Maguire, the author, actually gave the wicked witch the name Elphaba, as a nod to L. Frank Baum. The sound of his initials LFB.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,852 posts)... you should have memorized all the words and should be able to sing along throughout.
What's it about? I think it's about singing along. It's the new "Rocky Horror Picture Show".
Series, thanks for the review. You saved me some money.
NutmegYankee
(16,346 posts)I have the receiver sound system (multiple speakers and woofer) setups to properly play the complex audio. I particularly enjoy playing an LP on a nice turntable and pumping that into the receiver. Epica's "Design your Universe" is downright lovely on LP.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,677 posts)tavernier
(13,298 posts)I loved it both times but it was best when we sat quite close to the screen and really immersed ourselves in the story. Its meant to be a large experience, and watching it at home on a tv screen is like taking a YouTube tour of the Grand Canyon. And I dont understand the use of closed caption. For me it destroys the experience of watching a film, shooting my eyes back and forth to the words, missing the interaction and expressions of the actors telling the story. I dont think movies have deteriorated. I blame cell phones. We rely on text messages as the visual and auditory world passes us by.
BoRaGard
(3,350 posts)but of course the will run out version II - not going to waste time on that
Fla Dem
(25,920 posts)Went to see it in the theater just after Christmas. All daytime shows were sold out. We got tickets for 7:30 show. Was hoping I would stay awake through the end (lol). I use subtitles all the time at home. While it's not possible in the theater, I didn't need it.
The movie was FANTASTIC!!! The first hour was a bit slow as the plot and characters were being set up, the last hour and half was over the top. The music was great throughout. I really enjoyed it. While I was concerned it would be overly geared to younger people, (not Seniors) this movie held my attention right to the end. Did not want it to be over and I'm looking forward to Part 2.
Oh and I didn't doze off.
robbob
(3,650 posts)For movies and many shows I use Bluetooth headphones; it gives my that theatre quality sound without the need to invest in a big sound system. Without them, for movies especially, I cant make out half of what they are saying. Especially newer releases; TCM channel sounds just fine; watched Hitchcocks Spellbound last night and understood the dialogue perfectly well.
BannonsLiver
(18,291 posts)I. Am. Dying.
Chefs kiss to all involved! Absolutely magnificent.😘
Polybius
(18,562 posts)EX500rider
(11,611 posts)New flat screens have small speakers on the back of the unit which gives a muddy tinny sound IMO
They are designed to be used with a aftermarket sound setup like a sound bar or a full system like I use with a subwoofer, center speaker & 4 surround sound speakers in the corners of the room.
Mine is a 1,000 watt Sony I got at a pawn shop for $80.
LilElf70
(584 posts)the very least I expect is high quality sound, which includes the ability to hear and understand EVERY word. Why this movie has not accomplished this, is beyond me.
cbabe
(4,357 posts)all the engaging voices gone?
So many are nagging and borderline hostile or whispery or screechy.
They push the listener away like a mean kindergarten teacher instead of welcoming one into their story.
My major daily whine.
Ps my recent hearing test put me on top of all metrics. And Ive given up on many film/tv recordings.
Ms. Toad
(35,692 posts)But the NPR penchant for backing voices with music or other distracting sounds. I'm constantly reaching for my phone before I realize it's just the radio playing music behind the voices. And I worry about my mother, whose hearing aid largely just amplifies all sound - so she can't distinguish the voice from the music.
cbabe
(4,357 posts)Or npr has poor equipment. I noticed poor sound during COVID. Lots of at home broadcasts of poor quality. Seems to have hung over.
Maybe talk to an audiologist for helpful tips for your mom.
Ms. Toad
(35,692 posts)There are a lot of very direct references that help you understand the plot.
Iggo
(48,606 posts)I seem to remember the main characters from an obscure little technicolor film from back in 1939. Talking scarecrows and flying monkeys and such.
cksmithy
(257 posts)I have a Roku tv that you can adjust the sound settings from standard, speech, theater, music, big bass and high treble and auto. I have it set on speech and use headphones if not wearing my hearing aides for tinnitus. If tv is set on theater, for example, I hear the sound effects of people walking the across the road and mumbling voices, not people talking as they walk across a road. Having the sound set to speech makes a big difference. It makes voices or speech very prominent. I also have the cc on all the time in case I miss a word. Our old tv's all had an audio setting on the tv main menu for the tv's settings, like color, size ratio, audio, etc. Hope this helps and you still have time to watch. I have never seen Wicked, but I hear it is good.
cyclonefence
(4,911 posts)It'll make you feel better.
PCIntern
(27,056 posts)Two old guys, one 80 and one 87, were sitting on a park bench one morning. The 87-year-old had just finished his morning jog and wasn't even short of breath. The 80-year-old was amazed at the guy's stamina and asked him what he did to have so much energy. The 87-year-old said, "Well, I eat Jewish rye bread every day. It keeps your energy level high and you'll have great stamina with the ladies. You'll feel like 40 again!"
So, on the way home the 80-year-old stopped at the bakery. As he was looking around, the saleslady asked if he needed any help. He said, "Do you have any Jewish rye bread?" She said, "Yes, there's a whole shelf of it. Would you like some?"
He said, "I want five loaves." She said, "My goodness, five loaves! By the time you get to the 3rd loaf, it'll be hard."
He replied, "I can't believe everybody knows about this rye bread but me."