General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNotable claims from the alleged "manifesto" of the alleged Vegas bomber
Two podcasters that are connected to the military received emails from the Livelsberger, the alleged Vegas bomber. They read the emails and provided insight. You can watch the video here: https://democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=19871271
The email is shown 14:45 into the video.
Some key points
Livelsberger tried to get his message out to people he trusted by 12/31, saying that he would be "leaving" on Jan 1.
The emails made two big claims. Only two countries had "gravitic propulsion." They are the US and China. He thinks that the drone technology is a "mutually assured destruction" scenario, because presumably they cannot be stopped. Livelsberger thinks it's a show of force by China.
The other major point is that there were some drone strikes by the US in Afghanistan in 2019 against "drug" facilities. Many civilians were killed, and this was likely a war crime, that the US has been covering up. There is reporting on these incidents available: https://casebook.icrc.org/case-study/afghanistan-strikes-drug-processing-facilities
Livelsberger supposedly also claimed that the government was monitoring him, but they knew he was dangerous and were keeping their distance for now.
The podcasters have opinions on these topics, which I won't go far into. It appears that neither of them is familiar with "gravitic propulsion", so I'm guessing that the technology is not widely known to exist. They also think the event is meant to get attention, and not cause death and destruction.
They think that Livelsberger might still be alive. An army "public affairs officer" told one of them that the DNA of the person in the car doesn't match that of his son. I believe it insinuates that Livelsberger was upset after finding out a kid isn't his. But the guys in the video think it could be someone else's body in the front seat. He used a Tesla for two reasons. 1. It can limit the damage from the explosion. 2. It can drive itself, which is why he thinks there might be another body in the car.
Separately, there was a claim by one of the podcasters that Iran smuggled surface to air missiles into the US.
My take on it is that Livelsberger thought the drones and war crimes were a big deal and he wanted to do something very visible to get attention. Blowing up a truck on Trumps doorstep would do that, both with him and the media.
Dennis Donovan
(27,837 posts)Renew Deal
(83,165 posts)oldtime dfl_er
(7,022 posts)conspiracy nut?
Renew Deal
(83,165 posts)And the east coast drones remain unexplained.
oldtime dfl_er
(7,022 posts)and most of the drones were aircraft.
Think. Again.
(19,453 posts)....is that all three of these magats are (were) self-aggrandizing nutbags.
Beachnutt
(8,211 posts)and your insight.
Quiet Em
(1,285 posts)I don't believe he has a son.
Doubtful they took DNA from the infant daughter.
Renew Deal
(83,165 posts)It sounded like the army spokesperson was trying to misinform or change the narrative. It was left to the recipient of the information to interpret. So, what you're saying and what the army spokesperson said can both be true.
Quiet Em
(1,285 posts)"the DNA in the care didn't match with his son".
Whose son? Livelsberger doesn't have a son. He has a father. Are they referring to his father?
Blue_Tires
(57,066 posts)LeftInTX
(30,972 posts)I believe it's an authentic email from ML, but I take their commentary with a grain of salt because they're RW.
I don't know what the heck "gravitic propulsion" is.