Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dennis Donovan

(27,879 posts)
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 01:23 PM Dec 23

Raw Story: Merrick Garland's DOJ criticized for impeding Ethics Committee's Matt Gaetz investigation

Raw Story - Merrick Garland's DOJ criticized for impeding Ethics Committee's Matt Gaetz investigation

Sarah K. Burris
December 23, 2024 1:16PM ET

The House Ethics Committee revealed its report on former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) on Monday — with its authors complaining that Merrick Garland's Department of Justice stopped it from carrying out a more through investigation.

In its report, which alleged that Gaetz paid an underage girl for sex, among other claims, the Ethics Committee asserts: "The Committee was not able to speak with every woman who received payments from Representative Gaetz that were suspected of being part of illicit activity. Several women initially were responsive to the Committee’s outreach but later told the Committee they would not voluntarily participate. Other women were clear at first contact that they feared retaliation or were unwilling to voluntarily relive their interactions with Representative Gaetz."

"Due to the women’s reluctance to cooperate, as well as the delay caused by DOJ’s deferral request and subsequent refusal to provide meaningful cooperation, the Committee was unable to determine the full extent to which Representative Gaetz’s payments to women were compensation for engaging in sexual activity with him," the committee report continued.

The committee said that the information they did have access to "provides substantial reason to believe that many of the payments in the chart [below] were made in connection with sexual activity and/or illicit drug use."

The chart calculates funds paid to 12 women who spoke to the committee.

/snip
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Raw Story: Merrick Garland's DOJ criticized for impeding Ethics Committee's Matt Gaetz investigation (Original Post) Dennis Donovan Dec 23 OP
Garland being a disappointment yankee87 Dec 23 #1
The book expose on Garland term will be a doozy. Sneederbunk Dec 23 #2
Worse than a disappointment, he's a disaster Bobstandard Dec 23 #4
Yes Rebl2 Dec 23 #28
and trump will pay him back with "retribution" rampartd Dec 24 #33
Garland and his crew are expensive jokes NotHardly Dec 23 #18
He was a chaos agent from the start Blue_Tires Dec 23 #27
Yeah, DOJ had probable cause to arrest Gaetz long ago ... this is disgusting uponit7771 Dec 23 #3
MAGA Justice yankee87 Dec 23 #7
Should be called NAGA ... Never Again Get Arrested uponit7771 Dec 23 #11
For what? Serious question. Being a scumbag isn't illegal. Wiz Imp Dec 23 #26
Mann Act uponit7771 Dec 23 #31
Both the DOJ and the Ethics Committee concluded there wasn't sufficient evidence for that charge. Wiz Imp Dec 23 #32
I'm going to wait for Marcy Wheeler gab13by13 Dec 23 #5
He crossed the line from cautious to complicit a long time ago. Irish_Dem Dec 23 #6
This was the final straw. CrispyQ Dec 23 #10
Exactly. Treason at the highest level putting US national security and military at severe risk. Irish_Dem Dec 23 #16
I believe the "cautious" period was all a lie. Think. Again. Dec 23 #12
Another covert sleeper agent yes. Irish_Dem Dec 23 #15
Bribed? yankee87 Dec 23 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author dalton99a Dec 23 #8
I'm afraid so. Think. Again. Dec 23 #20
Garland had been a compromise candidate for SC delisen Dec 23 #9
Trump's MAGA moles in the DOJ doing their own "catch and kill" right under Garland's nose. W_HAMILTON Dec 23 #13
You actually think serious allegations about a sitting member of Congress paleotn Dec 23 #21
AG Milquetoast strike again at the heart of criminal behavior. mackdaddy Dec 23 #14
Who criticized the DOJ? A strongly worded letter? Festivito Dec 23 #17
Arguably the worst AG in American history. paleotn Dec 23 #19
"refusal to provide meaningful cooperation" moniss Dec 23 #22
Fire him LW1977 Dec 23 #24
Remember, we need to exercise patience. He Emile Dec 23 #25
Merrick the Meek in action again, not being political. republianmushroom Dec 23 #29
No more repugs heading DOJ or FBI. Way too partisan. GreenWave Dec 23 #30

yankee87

(2,417 posts)
1. Garland being a disappointment
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 01:28 PM
Dec 23

I'm just so sick of Garland and his lack of doing anything, there's nothing that could be done to make me hate him more.

Bobstandard

(1,723 posts)
4. Worse than a disappointment, he's a disaster
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 01:34 PM
Dec 23

It’s coming into focus that Garland wasn’t just slow, he appears more and more to have been responsible for impeding investigations into Trump and Republican wrong doing. Which brings us to the disaster of another term for Trump and a whole new band of fascists and looters. Thanks Garland.

rampartd

(1,024 posts)
33. and trump will pay him back with "retribution"
Tue Dec 24, 2024, 07:58 AM
Dec 24

karma may be the best justice we can hope for this trojan horse, and the relief that he is not a supreme court justice.

Wiz Imp

(2,560 posts)
26. For what? Serious question. Being a scumbag isn't illegal.
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 05:03 PM
Dec 23

Most of the tings the report detailed are serious ethical violations but not necessarily against the law. I'm pretty sure the statute of limitations on the statutory rape ran out before the DOJ even took the case.

Wiz Imp

(2,560 posts)
32. Both the DOJ and the Ethics Committee concluded there wasn't sufficient evidence for that charge.
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 08:50 PM
Dec 23

No way would the DOJ make an indictment in a case like this if they weren't confident they could get a conviction. And based on the info in the report, it's easy to see why they didn't think the could get a conviction.

gab13by13

(25,494 posts)
5. I'm going to wait for Marcy Wheeler
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 01:39 PM
Dec 23

to explain everything. She has been very quiet lately about Garland.

I was wrong about Garland early on, I thought he was afraid of Trump, now I believe he was complicit all along.

CrispyQ

(38,662 posts)
10. This was the final straw.
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 01:52 PM
Dec 23


There was absolutely no excuse for the slow responses to this by the archives, by the feds, or by the DOJ. Trump should have been arrested & locked up immediately & every one of his residences thoroughly searched. His entire life should have been put under a microscope. This pic just enrages me.

Saving democracy was the number one motivation dems told voters in 2020 & it was again in 2024. And I don't put any of that on Harris. It's all on Biden & his selections to head various departments.

Irish_Dem

(60,135 posts)
16. Exactly. Treason at the highest level putting US national security and military at severe risk.
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 02:18 PM
Dec 23

And CIA assets.

Garland refused to take action, would not even search Trump's other residences.
CIA knows there are documents at other residences as we speak.

Garland could not care less.

Think. Again.

(19,517 posts)
12. I believe the "cautious" period was all a lie.
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 01:58 PM
Dec 23

He has always been the complicit federalist society plant we thought he was all along.

Response to Dennis Donovan (Original post)

Think. Again.

(19,517 posts)
20. I'm afraid so.
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 03:19 PM
Dec 23

As accomplished as Biden is in politics, his innate goodness blinded him to the fact that over time, the republicans stopped being just a rival party and became a domestic enemy.

I think he realizes that now, I haven't heard him refer to his "friends across the aisle" in a couple of years.

delisen

(6,636 posts)
9. Garland had been a compromise candidate for SC
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 01:48 PM
Dec 23

When he was nominated by Obama for Supreme Court. He was seen as someone Republicans would likely vote for. McConnell quashed that hope and it would have been better if Biden nominated a stronger liberal for AG.

paleotn

(19,635 posts)
21. You actually think serious allegations about a sitting member of Congress
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 03:20 PM
Dec 23

would slip past or could be hidden from the AG? "Moles" or no "moles" that's not how it works.

mackdaddy

(1,619 posts)
14. AG Milquetoast strike again at the heart of criminal behavior.
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 02:01 PM
Dec 23

When seconds matter, Well let's think about it.

Festivito

(13,615 posts)
17. Who criticized the DOJ? A strongly worded letter?
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 02:35 PM
Dec 23

Enough money, a threat or two, and suddenly no testifying. No testimony, no conviction.

paleotn

(19,635 posts)
19. Arguably the worst AG in American history.
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 03:18 PM
Dec 23

One of Biden's few mistakes and by miles the most costly.

This complete and total failure to act is all because....supposedly.....we don't want to look "political." Well, there comes a point when the smart and observant realize that, hey!, I'm the only one playing by the goddamn rules. At that point, isn't it far wiser to put the damn rules aside? Too late now. The horse is in the next goddamn county.

moniss

(6,209 posts)
22. "refusal to provide meaningful cooperation"
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 03:23 PM
Dec 23

We need to unpack that phrase just a bit. There are investigations all the time with multiple parties investigating where one or the other wishes they had known something the other knew earlier but didn't because of confusion, logistics, uncertainty etc. That is not at all what we have here based on this phrase. The Committee is telling us in plain English that they asked for things from DOJ and DOJ actively refused. An affirmative step of refusal is different than a paperwork snafu, mistaken understanding etc. It is knowingly and purposely standing in the way of an investigation. That is obstruction and is a violation of 18 U.S.C 1505 which covers "obstruction of pending congressional or federal administrative proceedings".

But of course violations of Federal Statutes can only be prosecuted by........DOJ. So here we are America. We have a Supreme Court that says it is above the law and accountable to nobody for a lack of ethics that would make Billie Sol Estes look like a saint. Now we can add to that a DOJ that openly and willfully engaged in violation of a Federal Statute and so also demonstrates holding itself above the law.

But her e-mails. Heaven and Earth were moved and no stone left unturned, over and over again going through the same "materials, witnesses and evidence" to see if they could nail Hillary. But his gun form. Millions and millions of dollars spent investigating over the course of years, while listening to a witness whose credibility was never established from the start, and finally it comes down to paying some back taxes and making a common dodge about drug use while filling out a gun purchase form? DOJ/Special Counsel then prosecutes for things almost never prosecuted. But no Special Counsel for Gaetz?

Yet I, as a citizen, am supposed to believe in the rule of law? I am supposed to believe in "Equal Protection"?

Emile

(31,140 posts)
25. Remember, we need to exercise patience. He
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 04:26 PM
Dec 23

is crossing the T's and dotting the I's. Justice doesn't happen overnight.


republianmushroom

(18,298 posts)
29. Merrick the Meek in action again, not being political.
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 06:27 PM
Dec 23

Label the witness "unreliable", that should do it. Co-operate, hell no, you want to show our true colors.

47 months and counting

Jack 28 days left in the count down.

GreenWave

(9,556 posts)
30. No more repugs heading DOJ or FBI. Way too partisan.
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 06:42 PM
Dec 23

Of course our team must recapture our democracy and make those grifters pay it all back,

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Raw Story: Merrick Garlan...